Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
264 results
0.17s
Agency decision · Agency decision
The respondent is a single female alien, a native and citizen of Norway, who last entered the United States on August 15, 1974, at which e she was admitted as a nonimmigrant exchange visitor for a period … The language of the present Act according special treatment to ministers is basically unchanged from that contained in previous acts dating back to the Immigration Act of May 26, 1924, as amended.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
adjustment of status at least for a temporary period of time.4 Section 245(i) of the Act provides: (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (c) of this section, an alien physically present … The respondent nevertheless turns for support, not to any language of section 245(i) or any legislative history behind its enactment, but rather to an explanatory comment contained in the supplementary
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
CHARGES Warrant: Act of 1924—E8 U.S.C. 213 and 214, 1946 ed.]—No immigration visa. … Lodged: Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (6) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (6)1—After entry, member of Communist Party of United States.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Section 252, which is specifically mentioned in section 243(c), attached certain conditions to this crewman's admission: (1) He was only permitted to remain in the United States for the period of time … The only further comment on this point necessary is that the development of our first reason 3 It reads as follows: "In the case of any alien crewman who is ordered deported within 5 years after the granting
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
During all this period he was an unemancipated minor, in the custody and subject to the control of his stepfather. … foreign port or place or to an outlying possession was not intended or reasonably to be expected by him or his presence in a foreign port or place or in an outlying possession was not voluntary: - • • In commenting
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 23 I&N Dec. 319 (BIA 2002)
Agency decision · Agency decision
Further, there is nothing to prevent the respondent’s family members from sending financial support to her in Mexico, should it be needed. 1 We note Board Member Espenoza’s comment in her dissenting opinion … Act.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Although most of the material antedating 1927 need not be considered, we will comment on two matters which do have significance. … in the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1182(a) (28) and 1251(a) (6)1 Seetion 402(0(16) of the Immigration and Nationality Act [66 Stat. 279] repealed the 1918 Act and all amendments thereto,
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
made a "radical departure from the precedent decisions of this Board [by instead] employing the standards of Matter of Fernandez, supra, and Matter of Arai, supra," that he did so without citation or comment … See section 242(h) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1252(h).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
The only additional comment required on this point is that the Form ES-575—A (Statement of Alien's Qualifications) executed by the respondent had prominently displayed, at the top-obverse, a warning as … Thus, the respondent still has a 63-day voluntary departure period granted her by the special inquiry officer, running from the date of our decision, within which to depart voluntarily and thereby avoid
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
(p. 6-5) The Senate Committee Report No. 1137 (82d Cong., 2d January 29 1952) reporting for the Committee on the Judiciary on the bill which became the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 comments … The latter report discusses the term "psychopathic personality" as follows: Some comments should be evnressed regarding the term "psychopathic personality."
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
In commenting upon the alien's conviction for aiding and abetting the illegal entry of aliens into the 419 Interim Decision #2109 United States, we noted that, "This fact could support an inference that … section 244 (e) of the Act.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
While I agree with the majority’s opinion I merely wish to comment on the discussion regarding the Board’s power to reopen on its own motion in exceptional situations. … 243(h) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h) (1994).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Also, the respondent recently completed his period of probation (evidence of rehabilitation relevant to applications for discretionary relief). … It cited for this comment its prior decisions in Arias-Uribe, supra, and Dunn, supra.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
The district director returned the case to us, and in an order dated November 5, 1973 we granted both the respondent and the Immigration and Naturalization Service time to comment on these developments … is submitted by the petitioner to establish that the parties have a bona fide intention to marry and are legally able and actually willing to conclude a valid marriage in the United States within a period
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
CHARGE: Order to Show Cause: Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (2)l—neummeo longer roan toe pernOttet1 period after admission as a nonimmigrant seaman. … Concerning the element of voluntariness, the following comments were set out in the Nishikawa case: * * * Petitioner contends that voluntariness is an element of the expatriating act, and as such must
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Lodged : Refugee Relief Act of 1953—Section 7(b)—Ineligible for visa issued pursuant to section 4(a) (12) of Refugee Relief Act of 133.? … We shall briefly comment upon some of the cosec cited by the Service in support of its position. United States v.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
I am writing separately because the Immigration Judge’s thoughtful equal protection analysis, which would have resulted in a waiver grant in this case, requires further comment. … She entered the United States from Bolivia in 1989 as a nonimmigrant visitor for pleasure and overstayed the period of her admission in that status.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
United States prior to the age of 23 and by having been physically present in this country continuously for a 5-year period between the ages of 14 and 28. … Lee You Fee was, in fact, born in China on July 16, 1935, a date subsequent to May 24, 1934, The Government brief referred to the comments and analysis of the Immigration and Naturalization Service on
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
For these convictions, the applicant was fined $5000 and placed on probation for a period of 3 years. … In particular, the Court commented that, without the requirement of knowledge of illegality, the statute would criminalize otherwise innocent conduct.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
for any of the alleged acts of misconduct regardless of whether he had actual knowledge that the acts were proscribed by 8 CFR 292.3(a). (4) Any acts of misconduct in disbarment proceedings brought under … complaint was served on the respondent while he was in an interview booth evidently located in the offices of the Service in Chicago: The respondent took ten or fifteen minutes to read the complaint and then commented
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.