Documents

Oral argument — Sara Fox v. Leland Volunteer Fire/Rescue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2016

But that's two instances over a one-and-a-half-year period. … Harassment that went beyond what she herself witnessed, but also dealt with the other comments that she had heard.

Oral argument — Ellen Thomas v. Omni Hotels Mgmt Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2018

That is not how the innkeeper acted. In your view, could the homestead have just shut off the fountain on days when there were sub-freezing temperatures? … So it's not sprayed up in the air. And then what it does, it drips into the basin, and then it drops from that basin into the lower basin. Right.

Oral argument — Berkley Assurance Company v. CBG Building Company LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2024

And so what we do by upholding the district judge here is say to the district judges, you can, here's a clean rule, here's the default rule, the date that the complaint is filed. … And you tried to make it, the notice period be something like 90 days.

Oral argument — Matthew Perkins v. International Paper Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019

It's really up in the air, and it's very confused. … Did the employer sit there and do nothing, or did the employer act when it learned about it?

Oral argument — Volvo Group North America, LLC v. Truck Enterprises, Incorporate

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2018

I think that—I mean, consider that— You think that's a general principle applied in the circumstance of contiguous property and with maybe some comment on what that entails? Is that what that is? … You would be free of that obligation because under this statute, you have a right to a clean right of first refusal. I think that's right.

Oral argument — Glenda Westmoreland v. TWC Administration LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2019

She needed the date in the prior week because she hadn't cleaned out the form, and there were two dates misrepresented. … That's absolutely true, but it was not a dishonest act. It was done for the fact that she wanted the – It's not a dishonest act? No, Your Honor. It was to reflect the date the one-on-one occurred.

Oral argument — United States v. Dwayne Frazier

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014

Frazier over that extended period and could see Mr. Frazier deteriorate. … All of his urinalyses were clean. Then, during the Rule 11 college- I think that helps your case. I think it does. That he's acting crazy, but he's not taking illegal drugs.

Oral argument — United States v. Darrell Gillespie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2022

It was argued to the jury that conspiracy was sufficient based upon your comments, Judge Neumeier. We now know that that is insufficient. … Therefore, in question 11, they refer back to count one of the indictment, which only says conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, period, paragraph.

Oral argument — Claudio De Simone v. Alfasigma USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2020

Further, it was aired to issue a permanent injunction against Ledient. … Let me just, if I could just make this final comment.

Oral argument — Ronald Barton v. Constellium Rolled Products

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2017

But remember, this is a collective bargaining agreement, and these are governed by the National Labor Relations Act. … But in this case, it's not a clean inference. Well, neither are the inferences you're asking us to draw about the impact of the cap language.

Oral argument — Alyse Sanchez v. Kristi Noem

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2026

It seemed like sometimes the district court was saying the problem here is that an immigrant is removed during the application process, period. … This is the tradition of the Fourth Circuit, and then we write on a clean slate to try to resolve the issues. We thank you both for your arguments.

Oral argument — Robert Stafford, Jr. v. Bojangles' Restaurants, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024

Why they said – wage and hour cases are not as clean as it seems like you want them to be. … And pursuant to that policy, Bojangles paid shift managers during the class period 339,000 hours of overtime. Second. Well, I mean, that's fine, too.

Oral argument — EEOC v. Propak Logistics, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2014

EEOC acted reasonably when it filed this lawsuit. … You didn't appeal the latches determination and the district court rested its attorney's fee award on whether the EEOC acted unreasonably, page 10 of its order, acted unreasonably by initiating litigation

Oral argument — Bryan Molina-Diaz v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2024

To actually answer the question, you would have to observe the class for a period of time and measure the amount of time the teacher spent teaching versus the nature and number of disruptions by the students … So it seems like you're getting straight to why we should look at that with a clean slate without addressing how lope or bright compels that. So maybe you — I think we need that link.

Oral argument — Rebecca Snoeyenbos v. Marcia Curtis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

It's not a plein air standard of review because we're not challenging the jury's ruling as to the evidence. … It said a specific intended act of expression, not a specified harm. And there's a substantial difference between specified harm and specific intended act of expression. Who specifies the harm?

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Helton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014

And the district court, when it came time to choose the particular sentence in this case, didn't really provide any analysis of what the proper period of supervised release was. … It couldn't be a number that the court pulled out of thin air. I agree. $5 million, obviously, is what they stole. If I'm looking...

Oral argument — Reya Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2014

What about a discreet act? Let me ask you that. What would be your analysis under discreet act? … two were engaged in in probably a 15-hour period.

Oral argument — United States v. Jesmene Lockhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2018

So, again, where the slate is clean, where we don't have any evidence either way, the tie goes to affirming the district court's judgment. … And then, there's no evidence in plain air that he would have done differently. I think Massenburg would still say it's fine. You could give none of those. None of those things.

Oral argument — JTH Tax, Incorporated v. Gregory Aime

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2020

I'm here to make a brief comment. This is not an appropriate case for relief under the high standard of Rule 59e. … to May period.

Oral argument — United States v. Julio Alvarado Dubon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2025

the uh to the consent with respect to the protective sweep your honor my time is running I'll try to get to that very briefly there's no difference between consent and a truly consent it's a consent period … would hope they would judge i'm sure they would i practice law in richmond for a long time criminal defense work and i don't think the richmond's finest as they call them would just do that well i won't comment