Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,162 results
0.11s
Oral argument — United States v. Byron Moore
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2015
Someone goes in, they have to clean it out. It takes several weeks to clean it out. There's no witnesses, no identifiers, no CIs, no one, other than the conclusory statement. It's these guys. … The facts are so bare that it would be unreasonable for an officer to act in good faith in this matter. If there's no further questions from the court, I'll yield the balance.
32 min of audioOral argument — EEOC v. Ryan's Pointe Houston, L.L.C., et a
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2020
Additionally, she testified that while Villalobos was property manager, there were no clean units to show to protective tenants. But then she testified, actually, yes, there were clean units. … She acted as a firewall between whatever racial and ethnicities were being deduced from the statements that were said to her between February 9th and about.
38 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Olga Murra
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017
In no respect did any of the Mosaic victims, the victims in this case, turn over any confidential information or act in any way that was inconsistent with the privilege. … So that evidence, taken together with the bank records, which showed that the cleaning revenues funded Ms.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Gudipati
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2021
And, you know, that's a, I mean, that sliver of it is a legitimate transaction where they are selling the perfume and getting clean pesos. Okay. Then what happens to the clean pesos? … Blake, who was a government informant for a part of the time that they were interacting in this conspiracy and thus could not qualify as a co-conspirator during that period.
59 min of audioOral argument — Samuel Williams v. Christopher Epps
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2014
Out of thin air? I don't think so. … How many inmates have been in and out during that period of time? They go by tiers. There were 28 pens. I do not know if every pen was loaded.
63 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Vargas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2023
Or is there really an argument that you could structure that it's not a clean fit when we're looking at Kaiser? Certainly, your honor, there is an argument that it is not a clean fit. … they came out earlier this month so that needs to go through that period and then be submitted to Congress of course, so it may not get resolved this calendar year Assume, hypothetically, that it were
61 min of audioOral argument — Curtis Morgan v. Dow Chemical Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017
But, no, the dirty copies, I don't believe, should trigger the 30-day removal period. … And when it's disturbed, when the insulators use it, it releases asbestos into the air.
43 min of audioOral argument — Maxmed Healthcare, Inc. v. Thomas Price
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2017
So they then selected a time period, about a year and a half, and in that time period, it was a universe of 130 claims. … And after the 39 claims were found to be paid in air, and the air rate of almost 98%, it then did go to the ALJ, who individually did go through each of the 40 claims again and found a different outcome
44 min of audioOral argument — Robert Namer v. Broadcasting Board of Gov
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015
The Smith-Munn Act addressed both concerns. … I think they said they'd be fine with changing the website to namersvoiceofamerica.com and he can engage in all the speech he wants, asking his commenters. What's the problem with that?
37 min of audioOral argument — Cox Operating, L.L.C. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines In
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2015
The first, under the applicable statutes, and we're talking about the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as modified by OPA 90. … Period. There isn't a principle. Okay?
41 min of audioOral argument — Arthur Mitchell v. City of Naples
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018
who also worked outside the limitations period. … If anything needs to be done versus cleaning or any other general maintenance, mowing, cutting ditches, they do it.
41 min of audioOral argument — Jane Doe 1 v. City View Indep Sch Dist
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2025
That letter that occurred in July of 2022 is a discrete retaliatory act. It's the only act that took place within the prescriptive period. … the prescriptive period.
42 min of audioOral argument — Perez v. Southeast SNF
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2021
And that's what the PREP Act does there. … And then you have, and so, so that wipes the slate clean. There are no claims. There are no suits that can be brought. It's jurisdictional also.
29 min of audioOral argument — Intl Engy Ventures Manage v. Untd Engy Grp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2021
pursuant to the procedures of the Federal Arbitration Act. … I mean, I think you do review his finding for clear air, just as if you were in the KBR case where this court judge Haynes found that it was, there was no clear air that the district court found no prejudice
44 min of audioOral argument — Weiser-Brown Operating Company v. St. Paul Surplus
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2015
Your Honor, if you look at — there's general agreement in the case law and in authoritative commentators of what comprises a final proof of loss, in particular, identity of the parties making the claim … You've got a lot of procedural problems in this case that may bar sending a clean question to the Texas Supreme Court. Okay, thank you very much. Thank you, Your Honor. We request that the
41 min of audioOral argument — Jackson v. Gautreaux
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2021
So, you're zeroing in on when the 17 shots occur within this minute 25 period that begins with Birdwell. Okay. … Just to clear up a thing, Appellant also made a comment about the reversal. Which time did Henning shoot?
46 min of audioOral argument — Wilfred Jones v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019
He said if he had seen grease, he would have cleaned it up, and he didn't do that. That's also at page 146 of the record. … I think that the comments to 602 are helpful if you look at those, because under the comments, it says that foundational requirements of personal knowledge can be furnished by the testimony of the witness
14 min of audioOral argument — Wallace v. Performance Contractors
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2022
Now, we don't have to change our precedent because, I mean, there's a whole movement to change our precedent about what is an action and doesn't have to be a final act, and that's a whole scholarly debate … The T and A comment is a crude comment. Made repeatedly throughout numerous meetings every time. That's what she said. Yes, and that's the fact. We weren't there. We have to go on the record.
44 min of audioOral argument — Huisman N Amer v. Pharma Safe Indust
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2024
Cole was your employee and had to be on site for all this period of time and therefore was subject to the health care provided by Ocean Air, is that enough to trigger the indemnity? … Yes, as his, Coal sued Oceaneering as his joint Jones Act employer on a theory of, uh, borrowed servant, which the district court found was the case, uh, and vicarious liability for the acts of PharmaSafe
41 min of audioOral argument — Smith v. Kendall
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2024
She also asserted disability discrimination under Rehabilitation Act and also retaliation under Title VII. … were these revised claims under the Rehabilitation Act versus the ADA.
39 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.