Documents

Oral argument — Century Exploration v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 31, 1969

One, as I understand it, is changing the 30-day period to 120 days. That's correct. … They're telling us now 218,000 on your new calculation and certify to us that you can clean that up. Well, we couldn't do that. Now, they contracted with us to go do that under these OPA rules.

Oral argument — Forbes v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009

So the real issue in this case is the Portal to Portal Act that has not yet been addressed in any of the cases to that extent. And what's your argument going to be on the Portal to Portal Act? … It costs money to heat this building, air condition the building, to pay Mr. Billion's salary, pay our salaries.

Oral argument — Facebook, Inc. v. Pragmatus AV, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2014

But it's permanent, and I use that in air quotes, I apologize, but it's permanent for the time that the communication is happening. … What in column 21 or anywhere else has to persist over some period of time when connections are broken?

Oral argument — M-I Drilling Fluids UK Ltd. v. Dynamic Air Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2019

Dynamic Air. Mr. Carlson, whenever you're ready. Good morning. … But let me comment on the- Very briefly, because your time has expired. Yeah, let me comment on the post-filing. Take that in the context of what DAI did when it was sued.

Oral argument — BELKIN INTL v. KAPPOS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2012

During the initial stages, during the initiation period, re-examination was granted, Your Honor, as it relates to the claims that are in re-examination here. … It sounds like a mess and needs being cleaned up. Yes, Your Honor. I agree with that. How much does the AIA change this dispute?

Oral argument — CLARK v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 2, 2011

Section 10503, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau actually acts for the Secretary of the Army and Secretary of Defense, or Secretary of the Air Force when promulgating those regulations. … In Air National Guard Instruction 36201, which is the Air Force regulation, same thing, pre-approved. I think it's paragraph 1-10 in Air National Guard Regulation 36201.

Oral argument — NETSTAR-1 GOVERNMENT CONSULT v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2012

Three months is not an unreasonable time period. But even as important as that, the argument— But that's six months after learning of the error. … I would like to address your comment, Chief Judge Rader.

Oral argument — Schott Gemtron Corporation v. SSW Holding Company, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2015

Well, when you're cleaning a refrigerator shelf, if you have a cleaning solution, you might do exactly that. You might pour it on. That would retain it, and then you would wipe it off. … And that process, that technology, acting that way as you're putting it on, and after it's on the slide, it prevents migration.

Oral argument — In Re Google LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2019

, is distinguished from remote storage services under the Act. … In contrast, though, it's absolutely the case that machines can and do conduct business under the America Invents Act, Section 18C of that Act.

Oral argument — Atlas Global Technologies LLC v. Lianzhou Technologies Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2026

Here's what's concerning me because I thought we had tried to clean up where this work was going to be done in Echo Factor, and it seems like it's not been cleaned up enough if you're arguing this. … With that context in mind, it's important to see that the pre-complaint inducement period that we're all arguing about here is six months long.

Oral argument — Faust v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2014

The ADA and the – sorry, correct the name of the other act. The Rehabilitation Act. Thank you, ma'am. … I believe there are some comments by both sides. We're quoting certain provisions, but I don't believe there is a complete attachment of that provision. Okay.

Oral argument — Pro-Team Coil Nail Enterprise Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

If that's not enough to put them on notice that they need to clean up their act and get it on the record correctly, I don't know what is. … I guess the problem is that they thought, perhaps thought that they had cleaned up their act because the third supplemental request didn't need more or request any further information about reconciliation

Oral argument — Parra v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2017

The arbitrator, I wanted to point out, in his decision, he specifically credits the testimony of the deputy chief who's acting as the acting chief, Huffman, that keeping her on administrative duties would … For that period of time, she was restricted to administrative duties.

Oral argument — ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2019

You've got a short period of time, so why don't I... We'll turn to the chapter 90 provision. Yeah, which is the major issue. … So there is a substantial difference between that and the devices which act on light here, is there not?

Oral argument — Air Force v. Lockheed Martin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2010

However, in this case, all we knew was that for some of the period of the F-22 contract, the costs would go up. We had no idea of any offsets from other contracts. … The Air Force then saying, we're going to reprice the contract.

Oral argument — ESSEX ELECTRO ENGINEERS v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2011

I'm saying I think that the standard for this case and all cases, protests, is whether they acted rationally, whether they abused discretion, whether they acted illegally. … Paragraph 3.418, air transportability. You have lifting tie-down ring test and an air transportability test that ties in with all of those. Isn't this whole argument somewhat circular, though?

Oral argument — Leitner-Wise v. LWRC International, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2018

LWRC International The Patent Act of that time said, persons interested in the patent at the time when the suit was brought. … His office was broken into, his office was cleaned out.

Oral argument — ASSOC AMERICAN SCHOOL PAPER v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010

Horgan's comments. And a lot of the numbers here, this is a case about numbers, and a lot of the numbers are bracketed. … Any final comment? Final comment just regarding Eurodiff.

Oral argument — STALLWORTH v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

But to the extent that they did, it was not, it was not air. This court has said over and over again that it's a substance of a regulation, a substance of a requirement. Mr. … Is it your comment that in the paragraph we've been discussing in Andino, there is italics, but not of the word certifies? The italicized portion is review of all the evidence.

Oral argument — MGM Well Services v. Mega Lift

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2008

that thing which acts as a seal. … He clearly demonstrated that air and liquid could flow through the accused device. And yes, it was upside down.