Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.70s
Oral argument — United States v. Bailey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2016
It was a very long conspiracy period from October of 2010 until March of 2013. … And the judge even makes a comment. Now assume that's error. Yes.
64 min of audioOral argument — City of Countryside v. Countryside Police Pension Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018
That's clearly in the record and we feel that's on clean hands. … But it was being paid for a period of time, wasn't it? So it was paid without the city's knowledge for a period of time.
49 min of audioOral argument — Biogen Idec MA, Inc. v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015
So there is a very clean line of demarcation. Whether Congress might have done it differently... I'm not seeing that. … Can I just comment very briefly, Your Honor, on this Court's jurisdictional... Yeah, go ahead. Yeah, I think the problem is the basic...
56 min of audioOral argument — Tuftoy v. Rosenwinkel
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2011
And the legislative history of this act, and I might add the preamble to the act, is explicit. The idea is to protect farmland. It's to protect farmers. … In simple terms, clean it up, break the cycle of active fly breeding by cleaning up your operation. If you put it in the simplest terms. But your own expert said that you could never eliminate them.
56 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Kevin Reed
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2017
In this case, the district court's only comment regarding the issue and Reed's argument was that Reed had a functional, healthy family. … But not referred to in the district judge's comments. He has a learning disability. He has a learning disability, No, I'm aware of that.
16 min of audioOral argument — Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2017
It doesn't say when the bank has acted or in the past acted. It says when the bank is acting as the custodian or the agent. … But if we're looking for a clean answer, I mean, I think both sides are giving you a clean answer.
58 min of audioOral argument — MANUS v. RANGER
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2005
In other words, this is a clean-up case. Their problem there, their main problem there was that it wasn't a clean-up case. … , violent act.
37 min of audioOral argument — Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024
The question, the FDA Modernization Act 2.0. … But was that comment to be taken that you should have follow up, that you should further supplement your application in that regard?
59 min of audioOral argument — Shollenburg v.FDIC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2005
I've already stated to your honors that that only went on for eight months and they cleaned up their act by the time FDIC learned about it. … It's got, you know, we've got to clean up the act. They were ordered to clean up your act, pay those back taxes they did. They talked about, Ms.
30 min of audioOral argument — IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LIT
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2021
So there isn't really a clean period. … We could not then allege a clean period because there wasn't a clean period.
53 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Julia Hernandez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2021
Well, we're on plain air review, you say, because you decided to. You didn't object, so it'd have to be a plain air, it would be a plain air, and I would just act for purpose of judicial economy. … This is a plain air standard of review, as Your Honor mentioned, because defendant didn't object to these comments at trial.
24 min of audioOral argument — Clarke v. Community Unit School District 303
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2012
During the same period, however, Davis was also significantly overcrowded. Its enrollment reached a peak in the 2009-10 school year at 584 students. … It's not like a Clean Water Act situation where there's a citizen's lawsuit.
37 min of audioOral argument — Village of Deerfield v. Commonwealth Edison Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2009
You never commented on who you thought was the best arbiter of that determination. What is your position relative to that issue? The court. … And if now the court finds an issue of primary jurisdiction or whatever and sends it back to the ICC after that two-year period, all those claims and the complaints are gone, period, end of story.
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Clarence Haines
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2015
Guyton encountered each other four times at that Frenchman Street address during a nine-day period, and never once during that nine-day period did Mr. Guyton follow a meeting with such a call. … Well, that's the problem, and on a clean slate here, never mind Turner, on a clean slate, what would be the government's position nationwide? On a clean slate, individualized sentencing, Your Honor.
62 min of audioOral argument — Cherry v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2009
Sherry in this particular case, a maritime case under the Jones Act. … Jones Act generally speaks in negligence.
28 min of audioOral argument — Gebhardt v. Air Force
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2006
The AJ acts for the Board unless the Board acts for itself. And here, the Board acted for itself. So the question is, what has the Board done wrong? Okay. … Because I don't think he had a right to commit deceptive acts, but what he did was not a deceptive act.
25 min of audioOral argument — BELEI v. CASTRO
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2004
Your Honor, that is entirely out of thin air. There is no — Well, that is, but the Menendez brothers are not out of thin air. The Menendez brothers, there truly was no evidence in it. … The Menendez brothers' comment is the capstone to all of that.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Kevin Dugan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2011
So that entire period of time is excluded. … Beyond that, the two periods of time that are not covered by the motions are covered by two stipulations, a May 23, 2003 order, which excluded a period of time, and an October 7, 2003 order, which excluded
41 min of audioOral argument — James Ferrell v. Air EVAC EMS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2018
And I choose the word air carrier because that is the word Congress chose to put in the act. Are air evac ambulances included in the definition of air carriers? And where is that? Where can that be? … If you actually look at the legislative history of the Airline Deregulation Act in any depth, you will see a long dialogue about whether air taxis should be included in the definition of air carrier.
36 min of audioOral argument — Brown v. Wenderowicz
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2011
Well, we have the time periods, the sunset and twilight. Let me talk about that time period. That time period was not in the record before the state court, was it? No. Okay. … And we're not here with a clean slate. We don't have a clean slate. We can't look at this in a clean slate. We have to look at what the State Court found. And was it objectively unreasonable?
38 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.