Documents

Oral argument — Labuz v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2012

The appellate court, on the same basis, also commenting that it was a close case. … The traditional way of interpreting it during my 35 years of practice is it's time not worked, period.

Oral argument — Carpenter v. Meyer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2019

But it's whether or not that specific act would have caused the injuries. That's the real inquiry. … Now, there was a comment made or some discussion in the briefs before about seeing the boy before the accident.

Oral argument — Belshause v. Churchill

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2012

During the limitations period for filing a claim in this estate, plaintiff Elaine Belshause and defendant Daniel Churchill had an attorney-client relationship. … But they did ask him to comment on those issues at the time, and it's quite possible for him to do that review right there while they're sitting there.

Oral argument — Sisto v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2010

I mean under the Act. Is it possible to award somebody permanent partial disability benefits if they have no permanent injury? It shouldn't be legal to award somebody permanent partial disability. … Because in theory, that's the reason why we treat them, that we award them medical treatment, temporary disability benefits to assist them economically during their period of recovery.

Oral argument — Leehy v. City of Carbondale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2023

When they go and do a breathalyzer, there's a 20-minute observation period. If I understood it right, the investigating officer is in for a minimum of three hours even on an easy DUI. … What they get to do is set off that discrete period of time that involves the arrest and the impoundment. You can imagine any case you want, but what is the investigation?

Oral argument — People v. Tugume

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2010

But now, counsel, is there anything in the record to indicate that the defendant was forced to take the state's offer within a specific period of time? … I'd like to make one comment on my opposing counsel's comment that, well, when Ms.

Oral argument — People v. Tenney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2012

They thought they could act on their general consent. … Les's comment is that he believed that he had pulled out the ad box and that it was not sealed and he could see inside.

Oral argument — Levin v. Retirement Board of the County Employees' and Officers' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Cook County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2019

Well, outside of the Open Meetings Act, do you know that there was any procedure when they adopted it? There were none. … The liberal interpretation in favor of pensioners is required, period. But I don't think we need to get to that point.

Oral argument — In re Detention of Guthrie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2010

That's how both of the experts characterized what his comments were. … Well, how about the fact that he, over this period of time, was exposing himself, and then eventually that led to sexual violence? That's evidence which would support this opinion, isn't it?

Oral argument — Wells v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2020

Your client, I think said there was a two to three day period between the time he last checked and he found the water. That is correct. … Was any exhibit like that ever submitted for that three day period? They were not.

Oral argument — City of Aurora v. Association of Professional Police Officers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019

As opposed to here, albeit that the violations were ongoing and occurred multiple times over a long period of time, but there was no intervening discipline taken. Yes. Shouldn't the arbitrator... … Certainly, I can't comment on that. But it... There's a lot of strange things about this.

Oral argument — Rosenthal Collins Group v. Kennelly

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2010

You took one comment out of context, put it in your brief, and to me it read like the arbitrators were giving a pat on the back to the lawyers who presented the case in front of them, not the parties. … The basis of the cross-appeal is that the 90 days in the Arbitration Act is jurisdiction, and you can't do anything to get around it.

Oral argument — 1-19-0367

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2020

So what I'm suggesting is that that is a period of time. You can imply that that was a period of time that could have been worked out. My client didn't get another job during that time. … I think that we've each, you know, I don't think either one of us necessarily, except for the comments about what she just said about her client deciding that she wasn't going to go along with the deal

Oral argument — Matthews v. Chicago Transit Authority

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2014

or the Uniform Arbitration Act. … Thank you all for your comments and briefs.

Oral argument — Keating v. Gonzon Construction, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2010

the period of noncompliance, but shall be, and it says shall be liable in an action under any other applicable law in the state of Illinois. … So, you know, I ‑‑ I believe that it was an old ‑‑ Just a comment. Just a comment. We found Eisenberg. We do our own research. No, I understand you don't. We know about this case.

Oral argument — People v. McKinney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2011

So does the trial judge get to decide based on the facts whether the state acted diligently? The trial judge gets to, yes, Your Honor, the trial judge gets to make that decision. … And is it reasonable to assume that in a three-year period, a person can move from one state to another?

Oral argument — Seyller v. County of Kane

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2011

The court's going to have the benefit of my week of laryngitis today to keep my comments, I think, directly to the point. … If that reporting isn't happening for a period of weeks and a growing period of weeks after the convictions occur, those mandates aren't being performed.

Oral argument — People v. Gooch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2014

They were alleged three separate physical acts, and therefore would qualify for individual convictions and sentences. … I don't think that you can draw from the court's comments that it was a primary motivating factor for the imposition of the sentence.

Oral argument — Lutheran School of Theology v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2016

The Act is very, very specific. … I mean, the Act provides for it. Right. But... I don't know. Okay, go ahead.

Oral argument — People v. Akins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2016

During the first open session, during the public comments period, someone did get up and ask, are you going to be discussing the Mill Creek lease rates and covenants today? … You can cover it during commissioner comments. You can cover it during public comments. You can cover it in the motion. You can cover it in the discussion about the motion. You can cover it.