Documents

Oral argument — Lesner v. Police Board of City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2016

That period of suspension could be anything from 30 days to 60 days as it was in this case to 90 days. … The superintendent participates in the police board cases by acting as a prosecutor.

Oral argument — People v. Akins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2016

During the first open session, during the public comments period, someone did get up and ask, are you going to be discussing the Mill Creek lease rates and covenants today? … You can cover it during commissioner comments. You can cover it during public comments. You can cover it in the motion. You can cover it in the discussion about the motion. You can cover it.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Klaasen

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2016

Well, to the extent that you can comment on it, and not taking anything that's outside the record into account, or anything that's happened since the order was entered. … Section 610 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, the act that governed this proceeding as it took place prior to 2016.

Oral argument — People v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2010

Those comments were made after an evidentiary hearing. … There was two appeals during that period of time. Went back to the trial court. That time period that you're talking about is flawed. I don't know the second appeal.

Oral argument — In Matter of Guardianship of A.G.G., a Minor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010

There was a period of three weeks that she went to jail, and during that time, Victor cared for Alex until he bailed her out. … of omission and not acts of commission.

Oral argument — Central Mutual Insurance v. Tracy's Treasures, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2014

And it's a little bit unfair to say then by paying $172 an hour, they fulfilled their duty under those circumstances simply because in the short period of time after Mr. … That's their response to the burden that they have on Gideon to act as a prudent uninsured would have acted. What's the big deal?

Oral argument — Rees v. LGSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2011

It's found in section 3102 of the Tort Immunity Act The Tort Immunity Act deals with immunities. It doesn't create duties That's correct, Your Honor. … Unrath Just made with respect to those counts as well My comments today will focus on Counts three and four Against the school district defendants The issue here on appeal against the school District defendants

Oral argument — J.M. v. Briseno

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2010

Was in the bathroom for some period of time. The record is not clear as to whether it's three hours, which some thought, or a lesser period of time, but some period of time. … Yes, because otherwise why would you require affirmative testimony that she's too drunk to consent at the time of the act when the evidence is fairly clear?

Oral argument — Estate of Nardoni

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2015

So let's say you're in the six-month claim period. Is it still six months? I don't remember. … Let's say you're in the six-month claim period, and you've got two days left of the claim period, and the bank says, okay, well, now we're going to substitute this loan and we're going to extend this loan

Oral argument — People v. Goossens

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2014

pays off the child support arrearage, but in effect, I mean, can it just be, you know, there are a lot of fines and restitution entered against defendants and they are supposed to pay them during their period … The Campbell court couldn't point to any section of the Probation Act dealing with the authority to reimpose a fine from previous convictions.

Oral argument — Zimmerman Law Offices v. American Nationwide Bancorp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2013

Not only him, but the actual, which was demonstrated in the periods of corporate bail case, the actual owner and operator of the corporation was Aurora's son. … Do you have any further comments, ma'am? No. You don't want to comment on these? Do you disagree with the last portion of his representation? Why stand up to the mic? Can you explain why we're here?

Oral argument — People v. Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2015

Last comment. Thank you. May it please the court. Counsel. Lord Michael Bilan on behalf of the people. I will try to address all the issues that defense counsel has addressed. … We will take this matter under advisement and get back to you with a written decision within a short period of time. And we will now take a short recess.

Oral argument — People v. Belknap

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2019

Period. And whatever Youngblood did has absolutely no impact whatsoever on the claim of actual innocence. … It's an ineffective act. But we all know, based on the standard, it's just not an ineffective act of prejudice. And because of the fact that Dr.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of: Carrington

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2012

I mean, was there testimony presented that there was over a four-year period of time contemplation of marriage? No, I submit to you there were. … He disputes her assertions other than, yes, they had discussions or she made comments about wanting at some point to get married.

Oral argument — People v. Abernathy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2010

This isn't really, this isn't a case where the defendant was acting, you know, trying to get an attorney he couldn't afford. Of course, he could afford the public defender. Everybody can. … We simply can't afford to give indigent people counsel by counsel of their choice, period, because it would cost millions probably in a lot of cases. And so what we do is we do the best we can.

Oral argument — In re Parentage of Marshall

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2011

In July of 2003, the Parentage Act was amended to explicitly incorporate the removal provisions of Section 609 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. … Marshall longer periods of time in which to see Peyton, and based upon the sharing of the expenses and things of that nature, it is clear that while Mr.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Engst

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2014

We've been dealing with the same three cases for quite a period of time. Levinson is relatively new. But we've dealt with Lima, Lambert, and Hofstetter. And this is how it goes. … a far less standard than in the Marriage Act, or the Divorce Act, which again, the Divorce Act exempts the court from being bound by the burdens of the Divorce Act.

Oral argument — People v. Smollett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2023

Any other questions besides those comments? No, Justice. No, Justice. Thank you. I would ask you now to move on to your second argument. I will move on to my second argument. Thank you. … This is not an airing of all grievances that happens to Mr. Spillett. This is a very specific, very specific order as it relates to the 20CR case. So I don't believe this court has jurisdiction.

Oral argument — K. D. v. Grove community Unit School district No. 302 Bd. of Education

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2010

There's a 30 day resolution period and then from that period there are 45 days in which the hearing officer can order the, conduct a hearing and issue an order. … I mean the rest of Article 14 is linked very closely to the federal IDEA, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Oral argument — Village of Freeburg v. Helms

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2013

The citizens of Freeburg were certainly free to comment on it. It was passed. It was reported. The Helms family did what they were supposed to do. … The city could not be stopped from asserting that it was an invalid agreement and that it didn't have authority to act.