Documents

Oral argument — Neal Blankenship v. Consolidation Coal Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016

It's not covered by the Clean Water Act. They didn't go to the Clean Water. They got the permit from the state agency. … Virginia is one of 44 states to which the United States Environmental Protection Agency delegates section 402 of the Clean Water Act permitting authority.

Oral argument — People v. Radford

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2017

During the trial, there was a period where there were a number of journalism students who were in attendance at that time. … It's second-pronged structural plein air, or sorry, structural air, and therefore, second-pronged plain air.

Oral argument — Transupport, Incorporated v. Commissioner of IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2018

It can't just come out of, as Judge Barron said earlier, it just can't come out of thin air. It didn't come out of thin air. That was the marketing number they used. … No, I would hope it's not just picked out of the air. No, it's not picked out of the air. There's a reason why it showed up in the notice of deficiency.

Oral argument — Donna Avila v. Remco Hydraulics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010

Well, that's why I made the comment about the lawyer, because that's not our burden, about what tipped them. It simply was as the time began. … I mean, in today's Federal court world, that's a very, very long time to get your act together.

Oral argument — Monsanto Company v. David

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2007

I had the same question, and maybe you can comment on it. 295 of the appendix... There's a reference at the top of the page to... … I agree we give clear air deference to fact-findings, but unless I'm missing another piece of evidence in the record, this fact-finding is clearly wrong.

Oral argument — United States v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2024

I don't think that I've heard of probation normally acting as an intermediary with the doctor directly, and in fact, I think that that would be invasive. Ms. … Smith Well, the defendant here had a period of at least five years of sobriety. He's had success on supervision before.

Oral argument — Sierra Forest Legacy v. Sherman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2010

The agency comes in and cleans up the brush. … I would submit in my limited time that the Forest Service gave very focused, hard look on those particular comments.

Oral argument — ANSTINE v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2011

And so in order to have a claim here, you've got to have a claim that the Air Force acted improperly, which is what caused his resignation. … If the Air Force acted improperly in demoting him to the technical sergeant, and that brought him to the end of the period, and he chose to voluntarily retire, that seems to me still involuntary.

Oral argument — United States v. Thomas Tanke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2013

Do you want to adopt Judge Fisher's comments or would you like to modify them? Yes, I would adopt Judge Fisher's comments. Are you going to share your fee with him? … And in this case This was actually within the period that was alleged in the indictment.

Oral argument — United States v. David Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2014

The district judge, Judge Phillips, actually commented on Ms. Lipscomb's testimony at trial. Let me read you the direct quote from ER 1904. … was officially rejected by the Air Force.

Oral argument — Choice v. Visionquest Association

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2012

The good news is these kids actually were all toxicology clean and gifted students from a charter program. But you're right. … I know we've aired out quite a few. I'm certainly happy to address anything else.

Oral argument — BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2025

So it was fully aired in the Second Circuit. … HLF was a known Hamas financer that would soon get shut down during the relevant period, shut down at the beginning of the relevant period.

Oral argument — Carrillo v. Un Pac RR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2023

That analysis was specifically addressed by Congress in 2008 in the Act of September 25th of 2008 on the first page of the Act. … Carrillo from working for Union Pacific is the restrictions were limited to that five-year period, that critical five-year period where the risk for a future seizure is at its highest, 30 to 35 percent

Oral argument — City of Peoria v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2016

, the Occupational Disease Act, and the medical causation opinions presented by Dr. … Grant attended to each year, and he relied upon the latency period of nearly 20 years. Dr.

Oral argument — United States v. Lisette Lopez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2022

, which seems to refer back to a period which would make the crime within the correct time period. … Yeah, A1B Act 1. Yeah. I mean, that's... Yeah, that's the problem.

Oral argument — Metropolitan Alliance of Police v. Illinois Labor Relations Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 28, 2013

It's a determinate period with specific goals and an end point. … a bathroom, how to keep themselves clean.

Oral argument — Sierra Club v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2023

That's not related, that is not part of the Clean Water Act section 404 permit. Yes, but it shows that they are moving forward with the project. … Issues about the Climate Act impacts on gas demand, as Interveners acknowledged, were raised by New York, which in its comments said the Gas Act undercuts gas demand in New York.

Oral argument — Keenan v. Woodford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2003

Pierce, that came in, related to a period of time very long after the period of the trial. … It cannot be reversed by this Court in the absence of clear air by the district court, and it's our position that there was no clear air, in fact that the abundant and overwhelming weight of the evidence

Oral argument — Valbruna Slater Steel Corporat v. Joslyn Manufacturing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2019

Maurice obviously was a plaintiff bringing a claim in state court and then subsequently in federal court, which I think matches the pattern you laid out under the Sherman Act for their federal claim. … Obviously CERCLA's purpose is to clean up an entire site, not to clean up in one spot.

Oral argument — United States v. Montgomery O'Connor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2004

Weintraub, if the law says that all that is required is one overt act within the period of the statute of limitations, it doesn't have to be a criminal act in order to save all of the other overt acts, … In fact, they paid the cleaning fee that were associated with those.