Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.77s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 3, 2008
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 112(l) of the 1990 Clean Air Act, EPA granted delegation of specific national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) to the Nevada Division of Environmental … Authority: This action is issued under the authority of Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412. Dated: March 19, 2008.
73 FR 18229Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 1, 2014
to the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise. … Great Falls CO Maintenance Plan Under the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990, the Great Falls area was designated as nonattainment and classified as a “not classified” CO area.
79 FR 71057Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 12, 2009
EPA is proposing to make a determination under the Clean Air Act (CAA) that the Cleveland-Akron-Lorain nonattainment area has attained the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). … Division, September 4, 1992; “State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (ACT) Deadlines,” Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division
74 FR 27957Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 2, 2020
SUMMARY: Under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve elements of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of Oklahoma … The Oklahoma Clean Air Act provides the authority allowing the ODEQ to collect air monitoring data, quality-assure the results, and report the data.
85 FR 54Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Carbon Monoxide Implementation Plan; State of Alaska; Anchorage
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 3, 2002
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 38218Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Control of Gasoline Volatility
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 29, 2007
What Are the Relevant Clean Air Act Requirements? … Air Act.
72 FR 14729Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 19, 2012
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to withdraw a March 8, 2010 final action approving state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of California under the Clean Air Act (CAA) to provide for … Public Comment We will accept comments from the public on these proposals for the next 30 days.
77 FR 58078Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 12, 2005
These revisions are being proposed for approval in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 11, 2005. … Air Act.
70 FR 2085Environmental Protection AgencyRevision of Air Quality Implementation Plan; Nevada; Clark County; Stationary Source Permits
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 23, 2014
Air Act. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 42752Environmental Protection AgencyNew York: Incorporation by Reference of State Hazardous Waste Management Program
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 27, 2018
• Mail: Send written comments to Nidal Azzam, Base Program Management Section Chief, Hazardous Waste Programs Branch, Clean Air and Sustainability Division, EPA, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 22nd Floor … • Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to Nidal Azzam, Base Program Management Section Chief, Hazardous Waste Programs Branch, Clean Air and Sustainability Division, EPA, Region 2,
83 FR 18499Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 18, 2012
We are proposing to approve these negative declarations under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by May 18, 2012. … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
77 FR 23192Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York; Particulate Matter Control Strategy
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 20, 2022
These actions are being taken in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 20, 2022. … After evaluating Subpart 227-1 for consistency with the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), EPA regulations, and EPA policy, the EPA proposes to find that the submission addresses the PM requirements found
87 FR 57429Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 17, 2014
a public comment period; and (3) EPA taking action on the MVEB. … This comment period is concurrent with the comment period on this proposed action and comments should be submitted to the docket for this rulemaking.
79 FR 62389Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 22, 2013
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 12267Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New York; Part 212, Process Operations
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 1, 2021
period and public hearings, and the NYSDEC's responses to public comments. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations
86 FR 35042Environmental Protection AgencyRevision of Wastewater Treatment Exemptions for Hazardous Waste Mixtures (“Headworks Exemptions”)
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 8, 2003
Since the 1981 rule was published, the Agency has promulgated numerous air emissions regulations for new and existing sources under the Clean Air Act ( e.g. , MACT and NSPS programs). … Air Act programs.
68 FR 17234Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York State Implementation Plan Revision
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 6, 2004
required by the Clean Air Act. … What Are the Clean Air Act Requirements for NO X RACT?
69 FR 59839Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 15, 1999
We proposed the program in rulemakings under Sections 126 and 110 of the Clean Air Act. The program aims to reduce interstate transport of ozone by controlling emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX). … For further information and background on the data referenced by this notice and EPA's rulemakings related to NOX transport under Sections 126 and 110 of the Clean Air Act, see the August 9, 1999 notice
64 FR 50041Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Interstate Transport for Utah
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 10, 2016
Air Act (Act or CAA). … by the comment period deadline identified.
81 FR 28807Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 18, 1999
The intended effect of proposing approval of this rule is to regulate emissions of NOX in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 19, 1999. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office, AIR-4, Air Division, U.S.
64 FR 13375Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.