Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.64s
Oral argument — Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2014
rights during the period in which consolidation occurs. … And at the end of that hearing, the counsel for some of the plaintiffs with Sherman Act claims said, well, when you get done resolving, when you get done cleaning up the complaint and resolving the issues
60 min of audioOral argument — Sudder v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2022
As Your Honors are aware, the district court dismissed this action at the cleaning stage. … I caught one reference to 2014, which I actually don't think is in the complaint, but even if you use that as the benchmark, we're talking about a three-year limitations period on the RESPA claim, that
9 min of audioOral argument — American Premier Underwriters v. GE
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2021
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act is the federal statute that was designed to ensure that the costs associated with cleaning up contamination are borne by those … It required no intervening act on behalf of the operator.
38 min of audioOral argument — Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2019
or when it will air. … They have to clean it. They have to. The administrator has to get it cleaned, has to provide security, has to sort of organize the hours, et cetera.
60 min of audioOral argument — Manna v. Phillips 66 Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2020
If you argue that, for example, we argue from July 15th to the time that he was off, that was less than a two-week period. … , you need to come clean with us.
33 min of audioOral argument — Flight Options v. Local 1108
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2017
And under the Norris LaGuardia Act, they have to show that they have clean hands, that they've exerted every reasonable effort to resolve this, and that they've used all the mechanisms available to do … That's a matter outside the record on appeal, and it should not be considered at all, and we don't think the arbitrator's ambiguous comments can prove anything in this case. With respect to...
31 min of audioOral argument — Earthgrains Baking Companies v. Sycamore Family Bakery
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2025
You get two periods of time. And the court sets that period of time based specifically on that statute. And the statute says the original judgment. … I just think it's a clean way, based on Gildia and the standard that's set forth there, without having to disrupt or, you know, displace the court's findings on bad faith. How clean is it?
31 min of audioOral argument — EEOC v. Cash Depot
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2022
The descriptions of what he had to do during that time period may not be exactly what shows up, but he had to move, make repair, address compressors on the AIR machines. … I was not ever required to lift more than 25 pounds in handling air machine parts or in repairing air machines. And with respect to the ATMs, Mr.
41 min of audioOral argument — Plott Nursing Home v. Kathleen Sebelius
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2013
And if you look over on the far side also on the comments, it says area closed. And that's on 123? The date was 123? No, 128. 128. Right. And you can go through. … Judge, I want to respond directly to your comments and your questions about what the transcript actually said about that low-air loss mattress. Thank you.
43 min of audioOral argument — Boechler v. Interior
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2009
There are no witnesses that corroborate these allegedly heinous acts of government miscarriage. … Beckler to be referring to when he talks about flying an air attack mission? What's an air attack mission, if you understand?
34 min of audioOral argument — D.M. Robinson Chiropractic v. Illinois Farmers Ins. Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2011
Full billed amount, period, full stop. Okay. … I'd like to comment very briefly on the Consumer Fraud Act because we didn't get a chance to cover it earlier. In Avery and in a very recent Seventh Circuit case, Greenberger v.
48 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Robert Freeman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2013
And what I point to in support of that is that these people do not come before the court with clean hands at all. … And the district court's comments, and this is in the record, could not be more clear that this was being imposed, this restitution was being imposed as a condition of supervised release.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Eustorgio Flores
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2012
It's clean. It's not messed up, Flores states. There would be no discussion about the purity of a scale. The agents testified, it's clean, it's not messed up, referred to the purity. … And so there was, in fact, a clean scale and a messed up scale, so that comment could have been in reference to a scale. Unless the court has further questions, I'll submit. I don't.
23 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ryan Seideman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2012
There was a description, and there are reports that actually relate to that description, and I believe it was a Nike air trainer shoe's tread pattern was what was determined, and that was in the reports … How about the potential, I guess, prosecutorial misconduct here regarding the objection that the defense made to the belt and the comment that the prosecutor made?
51 min of audioOral argument — In the Matter of the Applicati
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2020
And I want to focus on those because in both instances, SWF acts as if we are here really on a clean slate, and we're not. … These issues were all aired. The exact same arguments were made below, and Judge Furman concluded against this entire factual record that they're not responsive.
37 min of audioOral argument — Banks v. McGlynn, Hays & Co., Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2025
To get back to the question I was asking before, so we have these two comments over a period of just short of two years. What else do you have? Like we said, Your Honor, we have two. … Banks, and the two pages dealt with the Family Medical Leave Act, which had nothing to do with this case.
27 min of audioOral argument — Gerald Farrell v. Michael Pompeo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2020
Right now that's up in the air. There's, to this day, a disagreement. Can you point me to some future, some consequence that might be reasonably likely? … Okay, so that seems clean and clear.
67 min of audioOral argument — Von Duprin LLC v. Major Holdings, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2021
So it not only cleaned up the properties, it put them back to good use. … And they can't wash that clean by looking back in, or I'm sorry, can't wash that clean by later saying that we satisfied the BFPP requirement at this later point in time.
61 min of audioOral argument — Armour v. Indianapolis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 29, 2012
And — but over the 30-year period, it's the same. … They want to make a clean break.
60 min of audioOral argument — United States v. King County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2024
And that's at record 3 ER 391, where Modern testifies that if not for the executive order, it would have continued servicing ICE air flights. … Here we have a very clean connection. On summary judgment, we have testimony from the third party that the executive order was a but-for cause in their decision to stop servicing these flights. Mr.
33 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.