Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
2,676 results
0.23s
Oral argument — City of Ottawa v. Osmonies, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2011
I've got a couple of observations, a couple of comments, and we'll go from there. First of all, I don't want any of you to be misled. This is a segregation action. … This flange bursting, as was described by the two attorneys who preceded me up here, occurred in February of 2004, long outside the warranty period.
34 min of audioOral argument — Village of Lincolnshire v. Olvera
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024
I believe it was the seventh period, which was the second to last period of the day. … Do you wish to comment on the forfeiture issue? I stand on what I argued.
33 min of audioOral argument — In re Charles H.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2011
To me, my experience here is that it's pretty rare that the legislature acts so quickly. … I'm in a period of recovery right now. But he was admitted to a mental health unit. He waved papers around. He said, I want to be discharged. He was loud.
38 min of audioOral argument — Borsellino v. Putnam
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2011
Tease Act. But Sims v. Tease Act didn't say that at all. … I'm sorry, I conflated there the Interest Act, which I didn't mean to do.
35 min of audioOral argument — People v. Dean
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2025
Count 1 is the count that specifically alleged that sexual penetration between his penis and MD's vagina within the relevant time period. … Sure, just some brief comments. And I just, Constable Nicolosi broke up there a little bit when talking about Issue 1, at least on my end. But I think I got the gist, I think, of what he was arguing.
21 min of audioOral argument — Dig Right In Landscaping v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2014
I do know that there was an interpreter for the independent medical evaluation, as required by the Workers' Compensation Act. … If this court finds that they do not have jurisdiction, my presumption is they could remand it back to the commission to have a third commissioner comment on whether they agree with the majority or prepare
36 min of audioOral argument — Napleton v. Great Lakes Bank
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2011
That the UCC provides that the trial court would then listen, as the comments mention, listen on a case-by-case basis to the facts of the case. … It's a reasonable time period. I suggest a year is probably the limit. It's not so bad. But go ahead. You had asked about a case.
25 min of audioOral argument — Estate of Shewey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024
Counsel, so if I'm clear, are you arguing that the defendants alleged failure to erect the fence is then an act of nonfeasance or an act of misfeasance? … But in parcel with my earlier comments about the lack of discovery that was allowed to proceed in this case clearly would have indicated through testimony of various friends and family members, whether
28 min of audioOral argument — Meade v. City of Rockford
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2015
But they're not acting as the city council when they did that. They were acting as the city council as a whole. I think therein lies the whole issue in this case. … It's just like a passing comment. This is the practice of the city, the custom and the practice of the city.
42 min of audioOral argument — People v. Karrae
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2012
Well, you agree you already said that really the only issue, everybody knew what acts she performed. The only issue was mental state. … Quote, a defendant cannot be found guilty but mentally ill unless he raises the defense of insanity, period. Quoting the Gozier case in the Illinois Supreme Court, and that is People v.
30 min of audioOral argument — People v. Childrous
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2019
To answer your question directly, though, I don't know, looking at the court's comments when sentencing this defendant, I don't know if the court has before it the known factors I'm not saying that it … It applies retroactively, period. Right. So are you saying it's a matter of public policy? It shouldn't apply to, I think the phrase is emerging adult.
34 min of audioOral argument — People v. Weaver
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2013
Weaver says there's some periods of time he doesn't remember. And then the trial judge, before he sentenced Mr. … That completes my comment, Your Honor. Thank you very much. I was going to say, I hope you can still wear that tie proudly by the time of the November call.
28 min of audioOral argument — People v. Morrison
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2013
It was a brief period when they weren't and Glen knew that his brother was having sexual relations with his girlfriend. … The defendant has confined his oral arguments to the first issue, but I would just like to make a comment.
20 min of audioOral argument — In re Tyler S.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013
than having no parent there in this case Tyler's mother was also the mother of the complainant and the trial court itself actually recognized this we know by at least sentencing because the trial court comments … for his client And also the respondent cannot get by the in re Austin M case and I quote very briefly from that There is no requirement that a guardian ad litem be appointed in delinquency proceedings period
43 min of audioOral argument — Guardianship of J.O.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2025
So there was still that period of time where the order of protection was pending. … I think that the comments about the relocation, how dad was in prison, none of that evidence was ever introduced in this case.
43 min of audioOral argument — People v. Lovelace
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2018
In there, in Nelson, the Supreme Court held that a Colorado statute called the Exoneration Act. … However, that comment didn't suggest some sort of foregone conclusion or a rigid policy or anything like that.
37 min of audioOral argument — People v. Starks
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2012
Certainly no trial judge made any comment relating to the supplemental petition. … That Padilla specifically doesn't allow collateral consequences are not what the Act contemplates.
41 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Carr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2016
But the parties came back every few months for review dates during that period of time. … Really, when you go through the record and read for what the judges say instead of what the parties say, not so much the testimony as the comments of counsel and the comments of the court, you get a totally
35 min of audioOral argument — People v. Fisher
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021
this is actually a case where the parties did the best they could to make sure that the defendant had an opportunity to correct himself, which indeed he admitted that he had started to get his life and act … So it, it, it was within a relatively short period of time. I would agree. Okay. All right. Thank you very much. Do either of my colleagues have any question based upon my short one?
55 min of audioOral argument — People v. Franklin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2016
The duties of the rule remain unfulfilled, and the very limited promise of representation and support that the Act provides for petitioners has been unmet. … I mean, what's the exact time period we're talking about? Five years.
35 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.