Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

2,676 results

0.23s

  • Oral argument — City of Ottawa v. Osmonies, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2011

    I've got a couple of observations, a couple of comments, and we'll go from there. First of all, I don't want any of you to be misled. This is a segregation action. … This flange bursting, as was described by the two attorneys who preceded me up here, occurred in February of 2004, long outside the warranty period.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Village of Lincolnshire v. Olvera

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

    I believe it was the seventh period, which was the second to last period of the day. … Do you wish to comment on the forfeiture issue? I stand on what I argued.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Charles H.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2011

    To me, my experience here is that it's pretty rare that the legislature acts so quickly. … I'm in a period of recovery right now. But he was admitted to a mental health unit. He waved papers around. He said, I want to be discharged. He was loud.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Borsellino v. Putnam

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2011

    Tease Act. But Sims v. Tease Act didn't say that at all. … I'm sorry, I conflated there the Interest Act, which I didn't mean to do.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Dean

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2025

    Count 1 is the count that specifically alleged that sexual penetration between his penis and MD's vagina within the relevant time period. … Sure, just some brief comments. And I just, Constable Nicolosi broke up there a little bit when talking about Issue 1, at least on my end. But I think I got the gist, I think, of what he was arguing.

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dig Right In Landscaping v. Workers' Compensation Commission

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2014

    I do know that there was an interpreter for the independent medical evaluation, as required by the Workers' Compensation Act. … If this court finds that they do not have jurisdiction, my presumption is they could remand it back to the commission to have a third commissioner comment on whether they agree with the majority or prepare

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Napleton v. Great Lakes Bank

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2011

    That the UCC provides that the trial court would then listen, as the comments mention, listen on a case-by-case basis to the facts of the case. … It's a reasonable time period. I suggest a year is probably the limit. It's not so bad. But go ahead. You had asked about a case.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Estate of Shewey

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024

    Counsel, so if I'm clear, are you arguing that the defendants alleged failure to erect the fence is then an act of nonfeasance or an act of misfeasance? … But in parcel with my earlier comments about the lack of discovery that was allowed to proceed in this case clearly would have indicated through testimony of various friends and family members, whether

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Meade v. City of Rockford

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2015

    But they're not acting as the city council when they did that. They were acting as the city council as a whole. I think therein lies the whole issue in this case. … It's just like a passing comment. This is the practice of the city, the custom and the practice of the city.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Karrae

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2012

    Well, you agree you already said that really the only issue, everybody knew what acts she performed. The only issue was mental state. … Quote, a defendant cannot be found guilty but mentally ill unless he raises the defense of insanity, period. Quoting the Gozier case in the Illinois Supreme Court, and that is People v.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Childrous

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2019

    To answer your question directly, though, I don't know, looking at the court's comments when sentencing this defendant, I don't know if the court has before it the known factors I'm not saying that it … It applies retroactively, period. Right. So are you saying it's a matter of public policy? It shouldn't apply to, I think the phrase is emerging adult.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Weaver

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2013

    Weaver says there's some periods of time he doesn't remember. And then the trial judge, before he sentenced Mr. … That completes my comment, Your Honor. Thank you very much. I was going to say, I hope you can still wear that tie proudly by the time of the November call.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Morrison

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2013

    It was a brief period when they weren't and Glen knew that his brother was having sexual relations with his girlfriend. … The defendant has confined his oral arguments to the first issue, but I would just like to make a comment.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Tyler S.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013

    than having no parent there in this case Tyler's mother was also the mother of the complainant and the trial court itself actually recognized this we know by at least sentencing because the trial court comments … for his client And also the respondent cannot get by the in re Austin M case and I quote very briefly from that There is no requirement that a guardian ad litem be appointed in delinquency proceedings period

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Guardianship of J.O.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2025

    So there was still that period of time where the order of protection was pending. … I think that the comments about the relocation, how dad was in prison, none of that evidence was ever introduced in this case.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Lovelace

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2018

    In there, in Nelson, the Supreme Court held that a Colorado statute called the Exoneration Act. … However, that comment didn't suggest some sort of foregone conclusion or a rigid policy or anything like that.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Starks

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2012

    Certainly no trial judge made any comment relating to the supplemental petition. … That Padilla specifically doesn't allow collateral consequences are not what the Act contemplates.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Marriage of Carr

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2016

    But the parties came back every few months for review dates during that period of time. … Really, when you go through the record and read for what the judges say instead of what the parties say, not so much the testimony as the comments of counsel and the comments of the court, you get a totally

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Fisher

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021

    this is actually a case where the parties did the best they could to make sure that the defendant had an opportunity to correct himself, which indeed he admitted that he had started to get his life and act … So it, it, it was within a relatively short period of time. I would agree. Okay. All right. Thank you very much. Do either of my colleagues have any question based upon my short one?

    55 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Franklin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2016

    The duties of the rule remain unfulfilled, and the very limited promise of representation and support that the Act provides for petitioners has been unmet. … I mean, what's the exact time period we're talking about? Five years.

    35 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.