Documents

Oral argument — Glidepath Development, LLC v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2019

In other words, hey, if you want to act on the order that was issued, you take your chances, because it might get reversed. … By comments of opposition to glide path, we made this a contested matter, which the ALJ had a rule on based on their petition, the comment response, and a reply, if there was a reply.

Oral argument — People v. Fisher

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021

this is actually a case where the parties did the best they could to make sure that the defendant had an opportunity to correct himself, which indeed he admitted that he had started to get his life and act … So it, it, it was within a relatively short period of time. I would agree. Okay. All right. Thank you very much. Do either of my colleagues have any question based upon my short one?

Oral argument — Thomas v. Khoury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2020

If there is an abortion, there is no cause of action under it, no wrongful death cause of action, period, end of story. What's your position? … If they didn't give us the act, then there would be no action for wrongful death. Correct. The legislature gives us the act, and something in the act is a little quirky.

Oral argument — AFSCME, Council 31 v. Rauner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2017

They all had to because of Section 21 of the Procedure for Relation Act. … a multi-year period of time that is set in stone.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Reedy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2019

So I have one preliminary comment, and I want to go back to the Peterson case, but the one preliminary comment is you can imagine the Pandora's box that would be opened if everybody who had a percentage … And then after three years, four years, whatever that period is, someone may come in on a modification.

Oral argument — People v. Macias

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2018

As it turned out, RC is Rene Cardona, and he was in jail for some period of time while the family was looking for him. … What's your comment to that?

Oral argument — People v. Franklin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2016

The duties of the rule remain unfulfilled, and the very limited promise of representation and support that the Act provides for petitioners has been unmet. … I mean, what's the exact time period we're talking about? Five years.

Oral argument — Luis & Miguel San Roman v. Childrens' Heart Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2010

Okay, so the record would be very clear that you would have felt an objection would have been a useless act. Exactly. … Well, there's still cases out there that hold that you have to renew the objection, you know, unless it's a useless act, so I assume that you're saying that this is a useless act.

Oral argument — 1-19-1161

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2020

And I understand your comments, Your Honor. Obviously, the board would like to have their decision affirmed. … And after he was released from the Marines, he was hired by the village of Franklin Park, and he served without any blemish for an 18 year period.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Snow

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2016

I think that the judge made the comment that certainly Mr. Unruh indicated that the judge made. So what does that comment mean to you? … Well, but this isn't an usual case because you have a survival act claim and a wrongful death act claim. There are many cases with survival act and wrongful death.

Oral argument — People v. Trzeciak

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2012

It was an act and it's a crime. Yes, it is a crime, yes. What you did. Yes. Locking up was an act. Yes. And that's criminal. Yes. The beating, that's an act. And that's criminal as well, yes. … In that period, the defendant is seen with a bleeding arm by two different people.

Oral argument — In re Marcus J.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2013

The goal of the Act was being fulfilled. The mandate of the state to provide him care and safety. He wasn't acting out. He was attending as he was supposed to. … I think the first point though is I want to address a comment that was made.

Oral argument — Hollywood Casino-Aurora, Inc. v. Aurora Metropolitan Expo

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2013

If the remedy requested is something other than damages, that section just has no application, period. … Because we were not requesting damages, 8101 is just not applicable, period. Is that my? Is that my? It hasn't gone off yet.

Oral argument — People v. 1995 Paughco Motorcycle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

You are correct the appellee has waived and I'm going to try and make my comments succinct. … Gannon and seen in the Granite City area throughout that period of time. Well, I think that's, I don't know if that's borne out by the record.

Oral argument — Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP v. City of East Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2010

I left it to my professor to criticize, to make that comment. But in fact, it still exists. McGee is still alive. … They acted purely as intermediaries without any assertion of any interest of their own, and it was all transitory.

Oral argument — 1-19-0986

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2020

The video shows a coherent defendant who is responsive and indicated numerous times that he understood his rights and has also made comments about knowing his rights, that he wasn't a little boy or rookie … He was unable to identify a certain time period when he could have an attorney, meaning during the questioning.

Oral argument — Haines v. Kaura

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2024

Now, one, we weren't just sitting around doing nothing in that time period. We were continuing with the extensive litigation, as you heard. … The funny thing here is that I looked, and counsel had made a comment of my not referencing anything. Yeah, I never. As far as I can tell, it doesn't happen.

Oral argument — 1-18-1109

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2020

They get the end front ends up in the air. They check kingpins, tie rods, driveshaft, everything. That was the agreement. Nothing more, nothing less. … Rebuilders only possesses the vehicle for the short periods of time during which maintenance is performed. What do we know about where the truck came from?

Oral argument — Bandy v. Delay

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2016

Bandy to act. He didn't do so. There was no repudiation by Delay and Steering. And Mr. Bandy has shown no detriment as a result of his letter and the seven-day purchase period. … If the court wants to address this issue for purposes of future guidance to litigants, we welcome said comments.

Oral argument — People v. Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 21, 2017

I think that there means under these particular facts, a prolonged period of time would suggest more other culpable conduct. … It would encompass acts that are not culpable acts. And I'll give you an example.