Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

2,676 results

0.19s

  • Oral argument — Webb v. Lightsey

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2018

    As this Court is aware, the Parentage Act requires child support to be calculated in the same manner as under the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. … Let me address my comments to the issue that it seems that the panel is interested in the most, this discretionary decision in terms of retroactive support.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Commitment of Birch

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 19, 2024

    He has been on conditional release, as you say, for a period of time already. … I've made my comment. Your point is that generic representation is not enough. Yes. And that's what you have here. There needs to be something specific to that respondent.

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Stefanski v. City of Chicago

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2015

    If the class remains certified, it should be narrowed according to the five-year limitations period. … And, you know, the bishop also did a comparison of the fund doctrine to the Attorney's Lien Act.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 1001 Ogden Avenue Partners v. Henry

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2017

    And they went on to say that the purpose of this, that should they do that, their actions were necessarily unlawful and the acts were null and void. … For Itasca 10, it was transferred in small amounts over a two-year period. For another one of the school districts here, it was transferred over a three-year period.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gambino v. WW Funding, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2011

    I do wish to address the document issue, but first if I may respond to a comment by counsel. … And if she doesn't act the way you'd like her to act, then you could bring it back before us, and we could review that. But I don't see why we should be reviewing this in the first instance.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Metropolitian Water v. Terra Foundation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2014

    Your comment really makes another argument that I think is worth looking at. Mr. … People acted? That had to do with a police officer, a district, some altercation between someone and a police officer. Okay.

    84 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Norris v. Mason

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2011

    It had that build-up period. … You know, from my take on reading what he said in his comments, I never got that impression. Was there something?

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rupert v. Welz

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2019

    So you've got 1979 to 1999 as your statute of limitations period, 20 years. And this case was brought, you know, as we know, long after 1999, way past that time period. … He made a deliberate decision to rely on the acts of the predecessors and interests alone. There is no case law precedent that I can find, and I've done exhaustive research on this.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — D.F.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

    I think that that is going to be a situation that probably is not going to come up because of the time periods under the Act. … Typically, DCFS is required to provide services to parents for a period of nine months before they could allege grounds M under the adoption act.

    65 min of audio
  • Oral argument — SEMB's, Inc. v. Gaming & Entertainment Management-Illinois, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2013

    Now, in our case, Metro and Vest, they made their assignments at periods of time when, and Metro made it before it applied for an application. … It doesn't comment with respect to that, and that's why one of the things you cannot... Who does the contract say, who does the statute say can contract? It doesn't provide that.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Spencer

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2010

    It was a verbal act. It wasn't offered for the truth of what's asserted. That statement was made. That was part of the occurrence. It was a verbal act. … That concludes my comment, Your Honor. Didn't another witness testify, a police officer, that he wasn't familiar with the term break yourself? It had no meaning to him? I believe that's true.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Peterson v. Village of Oakbrook

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

    The bottom line is this happened in 2007, in November, over a period of a few days. … Did I mean, is there anything during this period of this relevant period of time that indicated that Steve Peterson knew that the monies given to him somehow were also related to Stacy Peterson?

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hawthorne Race Course, Inc. v. Illinois Racing Board

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2012

    It simply extended it for that period of time. … therefore that would restart the period in connection with monies distributed under the 2008 Act.

    57 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Illinois Commerce Commission

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2013

    , which is the sections of the Act that talk about setting just and reasonable rates. … And that's why this course, you know, it struck down the comments market.

    54 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hofbauer v. Hofbauer

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2015

    It's spending substantial money in reliance and induced by the affirmative acts of the defendant. … What did she do during that period of time to stop him from using it? But my point is, let's assume she did.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — American Equine Insurance Group v. Dan Management Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2010

    Reading the transcript from when Judge Cobol was commenting at the end of Ms. … Absolutely they do, but the pivot here is their inaction for the period of time once they knew that this existed.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Reddick

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2014

    The state has conceded the third issue, so I'll be focusing my comments on the first two. … Well, there's longer periods and shorter periods that have been found to be not spontaneous.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Empire Indemnity Insurance v. Chicago Province

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2013

    They put emphasis on the word inflict to say that the actual physical acts of sexual abuse have to take place within their policy periods in order to trigger coverage. … And it's commonplace that victims of sexual abuse don't just suffer injury in the discrete time period in which they're subjected to physical acts of abuse.

    59 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Isom v. Barham

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2012

    Barham was a passenger, not a driver, which is not technically correct, just as an aside, that comment is made in the commission decision. But in any event, that was the state's position in 2007. … And the state has violated the law, thumbs their nose at the law, the entire time period. Not doing, not defending, not doing anything at all about what's going on.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jameson Real Estate, LLC v. Ahmed

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

    There's another point that Defendant Ahmed keeps going back to, and I look at the almost like a line-item basis as to the time period that they believe, they're perceiving that Jamison was acting as a … Well, I won't make a comment in that regard. But I will say this. Having been hired by Mr. Swanson to sell this property, Mr.

    43 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.