Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Reese

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2018

But you've got the 1st, the 2nd, 7th, the 10th, and the D.C. circuits saying that when you object to a Speedy Trial Act violation, you have to object to a particular period of time. That's right. … Underlying one of the comments you just made in the last two minutes sounded like an articulation of an ineffective assistance.

Oral argument — Mejia-Castanon v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2018

So if there are bad acts that take place after the 10-year period and during the time of adjudication in front of the court, this is a discretionary application, and bad acts should always be taken into … That period is that ten-year period with all the parameters put in place with the Immigration Act, the parameters that includes the stop-time rule, that includes the period of time immediately preceding

Oral argument — Khalil v. President United States of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025

Are they acting unreasonably? Is the system acting unreasonably in saying there needs to be somewhere where this can be brought before someone can be spirited out of the country? … And what it said is the reason that it's collateral is that it will deprive the plaintiffs of rights protected by the First Amendment during the period of appellate review.

Oral argument — Duran Pichardov.Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2012

Could you comment on Mr. Glenn's point that there had been a final determination so that he could not avail himself of 1447B? The only comment I can make. … However, all that's left is a ministerial act that does not involve the application of discretion.

Oral argument — Field Intelligence v. Xylem Dewatering

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2022

So oftentimes if I really wanted to overrule something, or make sure that the slate was wiped clean, you would expressly refer to a prior agreement. … Again, I mean, the, the, the period of time, the only relevance of this 2013 to 2017 period is does Xylem have a defense to breach the contract and a defense to theft of trade secrets?

Oral argument — United States v. Omnicare

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2017

a consultant so is it fair to say that you did not discover that the fraud was taking place you you just took public information and made it more precise that we would not go ahead and correct my my comment … this court observed in the Schumann case and that is not sufficient to establish direct and independent knowledge sufficient to establish yourself as an original source what about the post 2010 time period

Oral argument — Andrew Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates IIPC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2018

And that's based on the comments, the official comments to Regulations V and the Federal Reserve Board's statements, interpretations going all the way back to 1977. … I don't think it is because the court had in front of it the Braith versus Ball opinion and the Federal Reserve Board comments. And the Federal Reserve Board comments are also almost right on point.

Oral argument — Jamesv.Sutliff Saturn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

As far as a detailing shop, Your Honor, I think you may be aware that certain car buffs out there like to have their cars pretty clean. … That's an awfully long period of time.

Oral argument — USA Spay v. CVS Caremark Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2016

How do we know what the defendants' knowledge was during the relevant time period of 2006 and 2007? … said, do not act for us.

Oral argument — Westminster American v. Spruce1530LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2021

And you extend that into the post dismissal period. That's the analysis you have to make, which is the case of the facts inextricably intertwined. Is the law clear on this issue? … The district court was not writing on a clean didn't have to write on a clean slate. Instead of the abstract principle that well, there's distinctions between the two torts.

Oral argument — USAv.Binyamin Stimler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017

And the Stored Communication Act tells us what we have to do when we, in effect, are subpoenaing these records. … They wrote the Stored Communication Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2022

I mean, that's the purpose of the act. But to Judge Rendell's point, the act requires that the FBAR be filed, correct? The act requires that the FBAR be filed, that's correct. … During this period of time, the relevant period, 2007, 2008, a couple years thereafter, was he living outside the United States or was he living in Cranberry?

Oral argument — Rranci v. Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

He got an extended period of voluntary departure so that he could find himself a place to go. … And so he was asked a series of questions as to whether he indeed was acting voluntarily.

Oral argument — In Re Exide Technologies

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Bankruptcy court looked at New York law and correctly concluded that a contractual obligation can include both a duty to act and a duty to refrain from acting in a specified way. … The use restriction obligation is a duty of ENERSYS to not act in a specific way.

Oral argument — Clowney v. URS-AECOM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2020

And my comments are very limited because, quite frankly, the evidence with respect to my client, the International, is incredibly limited. … They didn't act arbitrarily, discriminatorily, or in bad faith.

Oral argument — USAv.Berberena

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2012

Well, they're operating on a clean slate here. … Dillon says it's a congressional act of lenity. Yes, it's a congressional act of lenity. And that's why, the bottom line is, Congress had the authority to set the...

Oral argument — 24-2211_25-1044_Whittaker Clark Daniels INC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2025

Protopappas was waiting for WCD to provide comments to the proposed order on the 27th of April. … Like if it were just Emeril, then I might say you have to clean up the language a little bit. But I think Wilton-Armitage did that. I mean, it basically is a nice, clean two-part test.

Oral argument — In Re Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016

Are you alleging that the monopolization period here was, what, June of 08 to July of 10? Is that right? Yes. And if all the theories are correct, you get that entire period. … If you've got two claims there, and one is clean Act Teva's, and the other involves Walker Process, the result jurisdictionally is what?

Oral argument — United States v. Corso

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 24, 2009

It would be plein air. Plein air. But the language – Now, I'm going to try to take you through this. It wasn't objected to below. We have a plein air review standard. … Do you have any comment on whether or not that is a preferred or non-preferred procedure? It's an approach that we've been looking at. It's one that we've started to do a little bit.

Oral argument — Yan v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2010

The argument that they would say, okay, what is it that is in the statute that tells you that somehow exclusion proceedings are exempted from the one-year limitation period for asylum? … , but he also failed to demonstrate that the board aired when it determined that he does not have a well-founded fear of persecution.