Documents

Oral argument — Defense v. Raytheon Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2009

Negligence in the air is not enough. Imputed interest is not enough. … You said that allocating the cost to a period and paying the cost in that period are not the same.

Oral argument — McGinn v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2019

That same year, she disclosed that one of DHS air charter contractors, CSI, was over-billing the government at over $2.5 million annually. Was that her job? … Then you had four acting directors or acting assistant directors coming in over the course of a year's time. None of those people were familiar with Ms. McGinn. Ms.

Oral argument — GROBER v. MAKO PRODUCTS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2011

Those initial comments did not apply to those claims that were confirmed. The point is that- The district court was incorrect? … Grober, during that four-month period, generate approximately 15 hours of billable time on analysis on whether there's an infringement or not. They conclude that there is an infringement. Mr.

Oral argument — EON-NET LP v. Flagstar Bancorp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2007

It was non-infringement because of the COFAC's license, which then tended to be negated by his response, which leaves other non-infringement questions hanging in the air, it seems to me. … Real quickly, before we were talking about where Judge Peckman did her construction, I made reference to her comments that it was illogical and baseless. If you look at 821-824, you'll find it there.

Oral argument — SCHECHNER v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2011

Schechner says that his work performance was good, but then she found that he committed three acts of negligence during this period of time. … He does dispute the adequacy of his work performance during this period.

Oral argument — MACLEAN v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2013

They removed him because he disclosed a message to cancel all air marshal coverage. So what would the statute have had to have said in order to withstand scrutiny under the Whistleblower Act? … It would have had to have said for this particular circumstance that it's prohibited to disclose the absence or existence of air marshal coverage, period.

Oral argument — Redline Detection, LLC v. Star Envirotech, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2015

The comments expressly state that. They took that into consideration in the published rulemaking and public comments. … You needed air. I'm glad you said that. You needed air. No, I'm glad you said where there's smoke, there's fire. I was waiting for somebody to say that.

Oral argument — EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES v. COREVALVE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

They needed that special facility that was available to them, the clean room and all that. And they needed this skilled workforce. That's why they came from France to Irvine in the first place. … Under the AIA Act, there's going to be more and more reexaminations. We all are aware of that.

Oral argument — Raytheon Company v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2015

The question is whether the agency acted on a rational basis. The only basis they acted on was the GAO decision. … Let me make just one comment about the TRL level. Ms. Madsen comes up to you and quotes the language from the RFP, but completely misrepresents it.

Oral argument — Nibco v. Tyco International

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2006

That's the genius of the 347 Act. What it did is that it transferred precise machining of the valve body components. … When they molded, there was excess rubber, and it had to be cleaned every time they molded a valve seat.

Oral argument — SimpleAir, Inc. v. Sony Ericsson Mobile

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2015

Mills, Simple Air's damages expert. In his opinion. Instead, he chose a completely – well, I'll withdraw the completely. … So, unless Your Honors have any questions about the comments that were made on the joint infringement or notification stuff, I think that addresses my rebuttal.

Oral argument — Greenspan v. VA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2006

Truman VA's hospital and in that capacity was to act and relay concerns to the administration that the physicians of the hospital had. … Now, Petitioner had aired his views in numerous venues, as I mentioned. There was no punishment made when he aired those views in those other venues. He was in a quasi-official position.

Oral argument — BELKIN INTL v. KAPPOS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2012

During the initial stages, during the initiation period, re-examination was granted, Your Honor, as it relates to the claims that are in re-examination here. … It sounds like a mess and needs being cleaned up. Yes, Your Honor. I agree with that. How much does the AIA change this dispute?

Oral argument — STRADER v. AGRICULTURE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2012

That someone was shooting, killing lions from the air? Right, and that goes to the first error that I talked about. … So the Airborne Hunting Act specifically says that federal employees do not violate this act.

Oral argument — Korte Construction Co. v. Secretary of the Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2026

It says extend the base, wide, chilled water, hot water, and compressed air piping. And you interpreted that as being all you had to do was compressed air piping. The other things were optional. … Is it an ambiguity, or is it just an indication that that's just not part of the contract, period? Even if it might be shown somehow in the drawing. We've already agreed. It's a little tiny book.

Oral argument — GPX International Tire Corp. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2015

This is notice of a government agency acting illegally. The government agency acting beyond the scope of its authority. … And so unlike, for example, Carlton, where there was a change in the statute, here they were acting to resolve an issue which remained up in the air to the extent that the Supreme Court might have reviewed

Oral argument — 27-35 Jackson Ave LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2024

The government presumably can't simply say, Well, the air conditioning was off for an hour and a half. Place is untenable. … But for a period of time to be determined as sufficient by the government, even if it is two hours that the air conditioning is off?

Oral argument — Montelongo v. OPM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2019

It's not on the record, but this act specifically makes it clearer that . . . … It does include under subsea military service and the time periods, but our position...

Oral argument — Century Exploration v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 31, 1969

One, as I understand it, is changing the 30-day period to 120 days. That's correct. … They're telling us now 218,000 on your new calculation and certify to us that you can clean that up. Well, we couldn't do that. Now, they contracted with us to go do that under these OPA rules.

Oral argument — In Re Google LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2019

, is distinguished from remote storage services under the Act. … In contrast, though, it's absolutely the case that machines can and do conduct business under the America Invents Act, Section 18C of that Act.