Documents

Oral argument — El Comite Para El Bienestar De v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010

This case, your honors, is about EPA's failure to ensure that California's state implementation plan meets the minimum requirements of the Clean Air Act. … In Section 307 of the Clean Air Act, Congress set forth a provision by which the window of opportunity for judicial review reopens.

Oral argument — Montana Sulphur & Chemical Com v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2011

But here, the Clean Air Act actually has another hammer where actually there's a statutory provision in the act that says, on judicial review, unless an issue is preserved, raised in comments, it's waived … They're all intended by EPA to result in a Clean Air Act for the citizens of Montana. Thank you. Thank you.

Oral argument — ASSOC. OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2005

EPA's approval of the PM10 plan here violates the Clean Air Act in three ways. … Air Act.

Oral argument — Latino Issues Forum v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2009

The Clean Air Act sets up a very specific definition of an exceptional event. … And the second issue is whether EPA has reasonably interpreted those ambiguous provisions of the Clean Air Act that are geared solely towards attainment of the standard as not applying for as long as the

Oral argument — California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Chico Scrap Metal, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2013

to do with the Clean Water Act. … And those are all my comments.

Oral argument — NRDC v. USDOT

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

In NEPA or the Clean Air Act? Well, the Clean Air Act and NEPA. Yeah. … First, they're derivative of the Clean Air Act and conformity determination arguments. So as Mr.

Oral argument — Association of Irritated Resid v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010

Basically, that's what's used to show that the region will meet a clean air standard. That is the basic fundamental of the Clean Air Act. … And that promise was that residents will meet clean air on time. They reaffirmed this in 1990 and gave more teeth to the Clean Air Act.

Oral argument — WildEarth Guardians v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

Air Act is intended or this section of the Clean Air Act is intended to address. … And the Clean Air Act protects air, not Jarbridge itself, and it is concerned about visibility in these national parks and wilderness areas.

Oral argument — Committee for A Better Arvin v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2025

Which is, across the Clean Air Act, Congress was very intentional about how and when it wanted feasibility, including costs, to be considered. … So to understand what the Clean Air Act requires of contingency measures, it's important to first clarify the role they play.

Oral argument — David Matusow v. Andrew Wheeler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2022

Air Act for EPA to excuse those. … That interpretation was a reasonable interpretation of the Clean Air Act and in last year's decision in Barr v.

Oral argument — Friends of Pinto Creek v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2006

The EAB did not look at that issue because they said we should have raised it in the 1998 comment period. Well, the 1998 comment period, the TMDL wasn't even issued until 2001. … The only NEPA comments that were made during the first public comment period related to the failure to do NEPA analysis on the two conditions. How about the second comment period?

Oral argument — NRDC v. South Coast Air Quality Manage

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2011

Air Act. … the Clean Air Act.

Oral argument — REDOIL v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 28, 2012

And under the Clean Air Act, for example, under Section – let's see if I got this right here. … And so what EPA has done here is very much count mobile vessel emissions under the Clean Air Act.

Oral argument — Safe Air For Everyone v. US EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2006

But it didn't have to under the Clean Air Act. You're not claiming they had any obligation under the Clean Air Act to do it. No. We're not claiming that that was the answer. … It's the same standard that applies to the emergency section of the Clean Air Act, Section 303.

Oral argument — Comm. for a Better Environment v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2014

Air Act. … The district has the discretion under the Clean Air Act to choose between these different approaches.

Oral argument — El Comite Para El Bienestar v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2015

Well, it is true, Your Honor, but Section 307 of the Clean Air Act does not state that anyone has to exhaust state administrative remedies prior to initiating... … What happens after that is EPA would make a finding that the SIP violates the Clean Air Act because it's, because they've only submitted 12%.

Oral argument — Association of Ameri v. South Coast Air Qual

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2009

And they have said repeatedly that the Clean Air Act and other federal environmental law statutes and ICTA have to be harmonized. ICTA does not trump the Clean Air Act. … I'd like to adjust Judge Lambert's question about what would happen if there wasn't a Clean Air Act? If the Clean Air Act wasn't at issue, would ICTA simply preempt? And the answer is no.

Oral argument — Wild Equity Institute v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2017

It's part of the Clean Air Act, but not part of the Endangered Species Act, is it? The language under Title V refers solely to the Clean Air Act and not the Endangered Species Act. … But that is not a flip-out to object to the Clean Air Act, to the Clean Air Act permit. Basically, EPA is just because of their silence? No. So the ESA is not eventually?

Oral argument — United States v. W.R. Grace

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2007

The Clean Air Act's knowing endangerment provision applies to releases of any hazardous air pollutant listed under Section 7412. … Air Act.

Oral argument — Ecological Rights Foundation v. PG&E

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2017

air. … an absolute law, period.