Documents

Oral argument — Milo Shammas v. Margaret Focarino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2014

Some of them in the Lanham Act itself? That's right, Your Honor. There are five of them. Five of them in the Lanham Act itself. … So we're on a clean slate or we're the first one? I don't think you're on a clean slate. We're the first court of appeals? Pardon?

Oral argument — Annakutty Joseph v. Target Stores, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023

It was an expert who was testifying that the slippery floor was created by probably a poor combination of cleaning products. … Does Virginia law comment on that issue?

Oral argument — West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Inc. v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2026

But if you just hear there's a, I mean, there's a Clean Water Act permit and you hear it's being violated, Clean Water Act permit is, you know, generally to protect against bad things in the water. … That is the normal way Clean Water Act violations are supposed to be addressed.

Oral argument — Retail Energy Advancement League v. Anthony Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2025

It says you can't market your product as green energy, period, because it comes from State X, even if it satisfies the requirements of the green energy definition that the State itself imposes. … I believe the bill that went through the General Assembly at the turn of the century was some sort of free choice act that opened up the state's energy market.

Oral argument — Michael Jones v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

And Jones admits at page 256 that Niblack told him he was acting childishly by cleaning out his office in the view of other employees. … Proud involved a six month period. And here you have a 30 month period or longer. But this court's on bank decision in Taylor involved a 27 month period.

Oral argument — Thomas Sweeney v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019

So the procedures at JA 131 say that a developmental air traffic controller who accepts such reassignment, which he did, is provided with a clean slate with respect to his training and has the ability … So this was to his benefit an opportunity for a clean slate rather than just being terminated. It was an opportunity for a clean slate as far as his training was discontinued.

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2015

If it's our burden to prove there was no air, we can't do it. We can't meet it. If it's the defendant's burden to prove there was air, he can't meet it because he can't show it. … I think the question is, was the time period a genuine cooling off period to the point where the judges, the fact of going before the same judge was going to not matter in clean in pleading guilty or,

Oral argument — Clean Air Carolina v. NC Dept of Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2016

I'm going to be representing the plaintiffs Clean Air Carolina, the North Carolina Wildlife Federation and the Yadkin Riverkeeper. … That, in other words, if this claim fails, that you're not sure there are Clean Water Act. Or I don't know what you said, but maybe you can characterize what you said more truthfully.

Oral argument — Wild Virginia v. United States Forest Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2021

But first, I'd like to address respondents' post hoc arguments about Virginia's Clean Water Act and the 401 certificate. … It says, all scientific information submitted to the agency during the public comment period was considered in the development of the FSEIS.

Oral argument — U.S. ex rel. David Grant v. United Airlines, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2018

But those are very general comments. What I'm looking for is what I think Rule 9 requires, which is specific. … So we believe that Discovery, we believe that we have very specific periods of time like that four-month period where there's no question that the repairs violated the regulations, Air Force orders actually

Oral argument — United States v. Southern Coal Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2022

Your Honor, that's, and piggybacking off of what Judge Rushing's comment was, and that is correct, but there is a very big distinction between a violation of an NPDES permit and the Clean Water Act. … So those are two different things under the Clean Water Act. They are different things under the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Sierra Club v. West Virginia DEP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022

But the Clean Water Act, as this court has held, is a strict liability statute. … There is no substantial compliance doctrine under the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Harris Investment Holdings, LLC v. BFJ of USA, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2026

to it overlooked evidence the record and failed to View the evidence and give all inferences to the to the plaintiff as required as a non-moving party now circle it encourages private individuals to clean … property But then refused to consider that the declaration on the grounds that it was untimely in the factual Evanson supporters opinion And we'll come back to that in just a second now this court also air

Oral argument — Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2020

Your Honor, we have not identified any medical organization that in the comment period attempted to establish the view that must – of Title X providers who've remained in the program that this does not … That would be like the EPA adopting an amount of Clean Air Act air pollutant at one part per million when industry came to the agency and said 40 parts per million is the only evidence-backed number that's

Oral argument — Osvaldo Figueroa v. Butterball, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025

With respect to the rate on the top of the pay stub, that is a fixed rate that for a period of time Mr. … Mount Air Farms that pre-shift and post-shift activities, when they are integral and indispensable to the principal activities, are compensable time.

Oral argument — United States v. Quintin Bell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2018

That should end this Court's analysis, period. This Court doesn't have to do anything else. … But when you do it in this context here, it sort of gives it kind of an air that maybe it was a little crafty.

Oral argument — Power Fuels, LLC v. Federal Mine Safety & Health

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014

the statutory purpose, which is to protect individuals who are engaged in the work of preparing the coal and may be exposed to such hazards as Your Honors have cited to before, such as coal dust in the air … They clean coal. They prepare coal to some general set of specifications.

Oral argument — Ohio Valley Environmental Coal v. United States Army Corps

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2016

Well, Your Honor, the distinction is the analysis of the state permitting under the Service Mining Act and the Clean Water Act really was directly relevant in the Maricoma decision to the question of whether … or the Clean Water Act discharge permits address human health, and here's how those issues satisfy the Corps' own obligations under NEPA.

Oral argument — Darrell Connor v. Covil Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2021

Directly working with asbestos, as compared to working in the training department and building P, that he described as clean as your own home, in Coble. … The fibers remain suspended in the air. So if they stopped five minutes before he approached, there would still be a lot of asbestos fibers in the air. It's important to note that.

Oral argument — United States v. Alan Butler

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2014

This wasn't just clean up and pounding nails, this was using his own construction equipment, building walls, digging trenches to perform valiant acts subcontracts and the district court said a couple of … he did not have Valiant Act pay himself a pay Mr.