Documents

Oral argument — Villareal v. Bureau of Prisons

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2018

And also made the comment... Now, these people that are testifying, were they former employees? Excuse me? This testimony that you're talking about, that was now, was in front of the arbitrator. … Okay, but this is during the seven-month period. Right. They have to show that... And this is all trying to decide whether a criminal act occurred? Well, yes.

Oral argument — Taylor v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2021

of time there where we could have done that the I'm it's a short period of time mind you but there's a period of time where we could have done that and then this would have been we could have filed that … that's saying that not only were they aware of these these overflights they had dammit they were damaging the enjoyment of the property for the tailors that's the allegation and they complained to the Air

Oral argument — SUNDT CONSTRUCTION v. AIR FORCE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2012

AIR FORCE ok Mr. Vela, am I pronouncing that correctly? You are pronouncing that correctly. Ok. Good morning and for the record my name is Brian Vela. … It does use, it refers to the period of performance, does it not? It does refer to period performance. And what is ambiguous about the phrase remain unchanged?

Oral argument — Fields v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2021

In the comments to the restatement, there's a dichotomy in cases. … And so the government still had not done so after being aware of her claims for a long period of time and her concerns.

Oral argument — MYTEE PRODUCTS v. HARRIS RESEARCH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2011

Starting at line 28, the air passing through the apertures, 12, provides for positive ventilation as indicated by the arrows, which act to transport away the carpet dampened dirt particles, 14 and the … These appeals address Harris Research patents, which protect carpet cleaning technology that's used globally by ChemDry franchisees.

Oral argument — Conforti v. The Ocean Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2009

Conforti, there are genuine issues of material fact as to the prior act's anticipation and obviousness of the claimed invention. … Your Honor, what Casio teaches is shining a narrow beam of light at a spot simulating an air canal. And it teaches shining that light at the air canal for a reason.

Oral argument — MYTEE PRODUCTS v. HARRIS RESEARCH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2011

Starting at line 28, the air passing through the apertures, 12, provides for positive ventilation as indicated by the arrows, which act to transport away the carpet dampened dirt particles, 14 and the … These appeals address Harris Research patents, which protect carpet cleaning technology that's used globally by ChemDry franchisees.

Oral argument — Energy Security v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2009

If you look at the Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program authorizing statute in the Non-Nuclear Act, we think it really looks to undertakings, to specific projects to show specific technologies, … In a sense, now we're in 2007, let's say, and we have this letter from the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.

Oral argument — Seskey v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007

It attaches a signed copy of the contract of the rich end company, which covered the period from 2002 to September 30, 2005 and was extended for four months in the period from October 1, 2005 to March … Well, of course, but that is only matters in this context if one infers from the entire set of circumstances that the agency was acting in a deceitful manner as opposed to acting in good faith based on

Oral argument — Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

Was Charlotte County charged with administering the Clean Air Act? No. Charlotte County... Or the Clean Water Act, you mean? No, not necessarily. … And even on its own terms, they're not charged with administering the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — VPR Brands, LP v. Shenzhen Weiboli Technology Co. Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2024

So don't you have to have clean hands in order to invoke this doctrine? I'm not convinced you have clean hands. Your Honor, my clients... … I appreciate the comment. Mr. Herr has two minutes. Thank you, Your Honor. On the balance of harms point, the Court should vacate the injunction. The plaintiff came up on clean hands.

Oral argument — ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2015

Well, Markman was a case about dry cleaning, but nobody thinks of Markman as standing for anything about dry cleaning. … , we don't have people yelling and waving slips of paper in the air to trade stocks anymore.

Oral argument — SharkNinja Operating LLC v. iRobot Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2024

BOP, this court's decision in Simple Air and others, the fact that there may be some repetition is not something that should trouble the court. … And the idea that this is, quote, similar to Toyota, that that's supposed to suggest to the board that Toyota would motivate something, I think is asking the board, as this court recently observed, to act

Oral argument — Hollingsworth v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2019

However, that does not obviate the requirements of the Civil Service Reform Act. … The – and I would like to address a couple of other comments.

Oral argument — Ameranth, Inc. v. Domino''s Pizza, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2023

But when they declined, they commented on it, and they said two things. … I'm not aware of authority that deals with that sort of clean of a hypothetical. But again, in this case, there were a lot of circumstances for patents.

Oral argument — Knowles Electronics LLC v. Cirrus Logic, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2017

So Noll's essentially went to wipe the board clean and started over and have a more narrow construction so that they can avoid the Halter reference. … So my only comment here is one has to take all this in the context of what was being disputed at the time.

Oral argument — JOSLYN v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2011

However, if during that transition time period, he is placed in temporary duties, which are not his regular duties, he's made to sweep the floors, clean out the halls, and other aspects of menial tasks … I believe he specifically stated, I'm trying to find his comment, well, without wasting time, also what comes into great question is Dr.

Oral argument — John Bean Technologies Corp. v. Morris & Associates, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2020

And the district court never considered whether Morris acted badly or whether it had clean hands or not. It just sort of brushed right by it. And it's haste to point the finger at John Bean. … Let me divert your attention just for a minute on something that's still up in the air for me, and that has to do with the recoupment of investment.

Oral argument — Sab Construction v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2006

This case arose at Nellis Air Force Base. It involved the renovation of visiting airman's quarters in 1999. … I'm just talking of the additional work you incurred in cleaning the condition up. Let me put that in a very precise time perspective.

Oral argument — M-I LLC v. FPUSA, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2015

Can you comment on whether the injunction needs to be reformulated for any one of those three reasons? … But I agree, it could be something that could be cleaned up below and just say, or any colorable version.