Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.61s
Reply Brief — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Evan Milligan, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 4, 2025
Callais, No. 24-109 (U.S. Sept. 24, 2025).................. 6, 7, 11 Transcript of Oral Reargument, Louisiana v. Callais, No. 24-109 (U.S. … Callais, No. 24-109 (U.S. Sept. 24, 2025). 1.
Opposition — United States v. Scott
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
States, 420 U.S. 377 United States v Covington, 395 U.S. 57 United States v Lovasco, No. 75-1844 United States v Martin-Linen Supply Co., No. 76-120, decided April 4, 1977 United States v Sisson, 399 … United States v Sisson, 399 U.S. 267.
434 U.S. 889Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 10, 2024
Id. n.2; Pet.App.24-25. In that the government was correct. But neither Percoco nor Binday is good law now—yet Mr. … Pet.App.21; Pet.App.24 (jury instruction); C.A.3.Appx.3302; C.A.3.Reh.Pet.(Dkt.126).28-29.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 17, 2018
STATE BAR OF CAL., 619 P.2D 399, 406, 414 (CAL. 1980) (PER CURIAM) ........................................14, 16 RAMSEY V. BD. … Louisiana 379 US 64 (1964) ........... 12, 24, 25, 26 Gentile v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dominick A. Occhicone, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 24, 2026
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 400, 106 S. Ct. 2595, 2597, 91 L. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 400, 106 S. Ct. 2595, 2597, 91 L. Ed. 2d 335 (1986).
Prologue — Triplett v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
Antonakopoulos, 399 F.3d 6B (ist Cig. 2005) ......---.-- United States v. Ardley, 242 F.3d 989 (llth Cir.2001) .......... United States v. Ardley, 273 F.3d 991 (11th Cir. 2001).......... … Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2005) ........... 24, 24 United States v. Rodriguez-Ceballos, 407 F.3d 937, 941 (8th Cir. 2005) ............ 24 United States v.
546 U.S. 1002Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michael Simko, Petitioner v. United States Steel Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 6, 2021
Ostapowicz, 541 F.2d at 399. … EEOC’s Br. 24; see also Hicks, 572 F.2d at 966.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 5, 2021
Lebron held that Amtrak “is part of the Government for purposes of the First Amendment.” 513 U.S. at 399. … Lebron, 513 U.S. at 399. In Department of Transportation v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Trevino v. Gates
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
Cornwell 896 F.2d at 399. 1 Under Cal. Gov. … Cornwell, 896 F.2d at 399.
520 U.S. 1117Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Gibbons
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1981
See Jurisdictional Statement at 23-24. … "In his dissent, Justice Black complained of the majority's departure from Ecker. 399 U.S. at 499.
450 U.S. 908Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · Nov 20, 2017
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006).1 Racially polarized voting is significant in Nueces County but insignificant in Travis County. … “[W]illfully ignor[ing] those who pointed out deficiencies,” id. 45a n.46, including its own attorney, the legislature ratified Plan C235 on June 24, 2013. I.
Agency decision · Agency decision
I 9 of March_19,` . 2003, ,(the 'date he withdrew from the law' firm) wa s $399 . … Thus, respondent concluded that petitioner"-s-capital account when he left Holland & Knight in 2003 •was $399 .,. .
United States Tax CourtAmicus Curiae Brief — Agostini v. Felton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Allen, 463 U.S. 388, 399 (1983) (quoting Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263, 274 (1981)) (emphasis added). … The Court noted in Mueller that Nyquist is an aberration in Establishment Clause jurisprudence. 463 U.S. at 399.
520 U.S. 1141Amicus Curiae Brief — Morgan v. Chris L. ex rel. Mike L.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
school property or at any school function, which act is prohibited by any of the following: (1) Code Section 16-5-21, relating to aggravated assault if a firearm is involved; (2) Code Section 16-5-24 … Drawer 399 Elberton, Georgia 30635 Tel: 706/283-2651 FAX: 706/283-2670 Attorneys for Georgia School Boards Association, Inc., Amicus Curiae
520 U.S. 1271Petitioners Brief — Howe v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1945
The memorandum opinion of the District Court (R. 24), the findings of fact (R. 34), and the conelusions of law (R. 35) are printed in full in the record, but are not re- ported. … S. 399. The Howe gifts are vested, not contingent (R. 8, 9, Par. 13), in seven named beneficiaries (R. 5) and there is no direction to accumulate.
324 U.S. 841Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 27, 2025
Goewey, 452 Mass. 399, 405 (2008). … Goewey, 452 Mass. 399, 403 & n.3, 405 (2008).
Request for Comments on World Health Organization Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework Review
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 29, 2016
The PIP-FW came into effect on May 24, 2011 when it was unanimously adopted by the Sixty-fourth World Health Assembly. … Personal data is requested pursuant to Public Law 99-399 (Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; Public Law 107-56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and E.O. 13356.
81 FR 17535State DepartmentReply Brief Petitioner — North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. v. McJunkin Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief Petitioner · 1962
United States, 250 -F. 2d 396, . 399 (App. … Frank Proctor ¢ August 24, 1962. ij
371 U.S. 830Amicus Curiae Brief — James K. Kahler, Petitioner v. Kansas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 9, 2019
Johnson, 399 A.2d 469 (R.I. 1979) .......................... 23 State v. Pike, 49 N.H. 399 (1870) .......................................... 20 State v. … Code Ann. § 35-41-3-6(b) (LexisNexis 2009) .............. 24 Kan. Stat. Ann.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Sep 4, 2018
Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) ....c.cceccecccceccceseeseseeeececceeecseueeneeeeceeaeaueneeees 22, 23 Cook v. … Texas, 486 U.S. 249 (1988) ..... 0... cecceeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeees 23, 24, 29 Strickland v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.