Documents

Oral argument — Papin v. Univ of MS Med Ctr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

The question is who changed the deal for the 60-day period? Who gave him this extra contractual agreement, the clean slate agreement? So we're not debating who's responsible for firing. … He was, there were comments on his evaluations as he went through different rotations. And where in the contract does it say you have to get along with everyone?

Oral argument — Duong v. McGrath

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2005

it to be a comment on the failure to testify. … There was extensive testimony over a two-week period by witnesses produced by the prosecution.

Oral argument — ABM Janitorial Services v. MB Real Estate Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2011

They're not mopping floors to get them clean. They're mopping floors to clean up water that's coming in through a roof. … Your Honor, this brief comment was made in reference to Pekin v. Wilson, whether this court can go beyond the four corners of the underlying complaint.

Oral argument — Marriage of Herring

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2023

I appreciate the court's comments, and I want to give clarification. … If I may briefly just comment on it.

Oral argument — Jane Doe 1 v. The City of New

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2016

We've got another argument that she shouldn't get an injunction because even if she was entitled, did have a damages claim, we've cleaned up our act, things are different now, there's no reason to give … No, you cleaned up things before.

Oral argument — Mathis and Sons, Inc. v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2010

The act says you get the emergency room plus two choices and all referrals that come from those. … Because the act has a system that we're supposed to follow. No.

Oral argument — Ondrusek v. United States Army Corps

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2024

Economic injury in the NEPA Clean Water Act context is the smallest tail wagging the biggest dog. These are environmental injury cases. … So we fall well within the ambit of the protected interests of both NEPA and the Clean Water Act. Thank you, Your Honor. All right.

Oral argument — Indemnity Insurance Company of v. Unitrans International Corpora

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2022

Was there some agreement between the parties to toll that period? I don't believe so, Your Honor. … Carriage by air is a defined term of art. 18.3 then defines that term. It says carriage by air comprises the period during which the cargo is in the charge of the carrier.

Oral argument — Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of NV

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2012

As long as you didn't rise to the level of a discreet act under retaliation, you can make that employee's life miserable. … I mean, the issue about whether she was going to clean the trailer, I mean, the statement was made to her, clean the trailer in your French maid costume. Was that part of her responsibilities or no?

Oral argument — SKOLNICK v. FEDERAL AVIATION

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2005

But that statute doesn't have the time period. Now, I would be very troubled by a time period that did not have an out for a later developing First Amendment interest. … I'm mindful of the Court's comments. If there's any questions. Kagan. Thank you very much, counsel. I have a question. Okay. Thank you. Mindful of my time, I'll move right along.

Oral argument — United States v. Rodney Anderson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

Your Honor, in fact, the comment or testimony in the tape, that whole series of things was objected to. Trial counsel made a very forceful objection, in fact. … Those paragraphs include the overt acts that allege a fire occurred.

Oral argument — Rohnert Park Citizens to Enfor v. United States Department of Tr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2010

during a comment period. … The comments section, and in many ways, whether it's an EIS or an EA, is really the heart of showing that the agency met its burden under the Administrative Procedure Act. And DOT met it here.

Oral argument — Kevin Simmons v. G. Arnett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2022

Because you only got a 15-minute period here, you got no comment, then you got slipped in the water. I mean, we know how close to when the other medical professionals took over the actual. . . … And in being such a short period of time and acting quickly, once it was discovered there was, if I remember right, a broken leg with the bone sticking out, how any of that would seem to be consistent

Oral argument — Ramona Rocheleau v. Microsemi Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2017

So how can she blame them for not telling shareholders when they had no obligation to disclose anything to the shareholders at the time period, by the time period in which your client sent the report in … Your Honors, I'd like to just briefly comment on a few of the factual assertions that we just heard.

Oral argument — Rushforth v. Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2019

We really have to liberally apply the Social Security Act. Dr. Caputo treated him for many, many years. … I will, let me try to address those comments. There's no evidence that his conditions got worse. The reason the second period was a year and a half or two later is because he didn't reapply.

Oral argument — Carolina Perez v. Andrew Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2021

That's not the standard under the Social Security Act. They have to show that their impairments caused disabling symptoms for a period of 12 continuous months. … And she needed to have a clean environment.

Oral argument — Michelle Gilstrap v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2012

Well, by virtue of the remedy he's seeking, the Air Carrier Access Act says provides for a very specific enforcement mechanism, and if you're going to point to a violation of the Air Carrier Access Act … The General Aviation Revitalization Act, the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, the Air Carrier Access Act of 1986, all have gotten into the Federal Aviation Act as various amendments.

Oral argument — Kim Cramton v. Grabbagreen Franchising LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2023

Well, Your Honor, I guess two comments on that. One, I don't think we need to go there given the admission in the summary judgment response that they were insolvent. … And I don't think we need to wrestle with Article 3 of the Act. And there's no dispute as to what the amount was due. It's $23,017 and change. The district court was right on all three parts.

Oral argument — People v. Wilson-Neuelib

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2020

And the judge admitted that and commented, we don't know what a de facto sentence is. … Basically, you're saying any case where there was a sentence before buffer is going to have air.

Oral argument — Northwest Env. Def. v. Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

The question presented by this appeal is whether pipes, ditches, and channels are point sources under the Clean Water Act. That question is reviewed de novo. … That is to say, this particular runoff runs off the way it does without violating anything except possibly Clean Water Act. Is that correct?