Documents

Oral argument — Messinger v. US Bancorp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2006

A couple of comments about that. Before we leave that, is that equivalent to a finding that the employer did not act reasonably in terminating her for violation? … That the employer did not act reasonably? Right.

Oral argument — Kim v. Google LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2026

Now, again, that could mean that they were visiting either in the U.S. at the back half of the period or in Korea at the first half of the period. … My understanding is before the act or the speech at issue can be protected.

Oral argument — Hip Hop Beverage Corp. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2018

Well, I mean, did he just pick this date out of the air? I mean, is this an incompetent lawyer? I don't... Well... Are you blaming it on prior counsel? The date, yes. … And then six days into the limitations period, and not even considering the contradiction with the repeatedly pled discovery date of April 2012, just six days into the limitations period, pop, they became

Oral argument — Carla Wigton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2022

I'd appreciate your comment on that. … For instance, some of the interactions happened off the workplace, outside the work hours, and there's a question as to whether or not bringing someone out to clean a private cabin is related to the business

Oral argument — Anniversary Mining Claims, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2021

We know from what we have is that there's an allegation that in 1952, the United States established Nellis Air Force Base and that included condemning a portion of the road that was used up until that … So, again, for purposes of an easement by necessity, the condemnation would be the relevant time period.

Oral argument — United States v. Hummingway

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2004

I shaved every day, I showered every day, I was clean, and I needed to keep all of my materials together so that I could present it to these people. … It's the same thing as serious obstruction conduct acting out in court.

Oral argument — Muyingo v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2006

And, in fact, the immigration judge commented on that during his holding, that that isn't a contradiction. … The reason that the Real ID Act does not impact that decision is because the Real ID Act added 1252A2D, which expands jurisdiction if it was previously precluded prior to the enactment of Real ID Act.

Oral argument — In re: Anderson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2023

But it identifies various acts and events that occurred. … The department didn't act dishonestly or unfairly, and the bankruptcy didn't air when it concluded the department didn't breach the former leases as a matter of law and entered summary judgment.

Oral argument — 02-30354 United States v. Glasgow, Duval

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2003

Number one, because there was no objection, are you going to look at it in terms of plain air? If you are, where's the prejudice? There is none. Even the defendant's counsel concedes that. … We'll be more precise if that's the agreement we want to make, but that's how we have to act now. But pre-Quash, we were talking about Rule 35, 5K, sentence, whatever.

Oral argument — 02-30354 United States v. Glasgow, Duval

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2003

Number one, because there was no objection, are you going to look at it in terms of plain air? If you are, where's the prejudice? There is none. Even the defendant's counsel concedes that. … But that's how we have to act now. But pre-Quash, we were talking about Rule 35, 5K, sentence, whatever.

Oral argument — United Cerebral Palsy of Grea v. Bureau of Gambling Control

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009

The question is, maybe I'm misinterpreting it, you're going to shut down bingo, period? … I appreciate your comments. But I'm not sure now what public interest really means because I assume that we would defer to the legislature.

Oral argument — United States v. Eggleston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2025

conversation this conversation at the gate they described that culminated in the officers coming up to put cuffs on him and that he didn't he didn't seem as surprised or resist or whatever during that period … up a can of a can of what whatever you want to call I would say it's more fairly characterized is that the officer and direct had done this damage by what he had said and defense counsel was trying to clean

Oral argument — Pena v. City of Los Angeles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025

In 200 years of jurisprudence, the closest he comes is an offhand comment by an intermediate court in New York, which does not rule on the issue, does not adjudicate the issue, but simply comments on that … Because that means that anytime the police act at all, even no matter how reasonably, there's this veneer of potential financial liability which will inevitably change how they act.

Oral argument — San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper v. Santa Maria Valley Water Conse

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2022

There, the project was modified quite extensively, in fact, to address the subsequent passage of the Clean Water Act. … Fish and Game commented on it. United States Fish and Wildlife commented on it. And everybody agreed at that point, before the circumstances had been changed, there should be no water for fish.

Oral argument — DairyAmerica, Inc. v. New York Marine and General In

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010

During what period? It doesn't say what period. And that's the crucial issue. That clause never mentions a period of time. And that is controlled in every policy of insurance. … But the binder and I have a time period. And the policy and the binder have a time period. It's like imagine if you bought a collision policy for your car.

Oral argument — Forest Grove School District v. T.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010

Let me cite some facts to you, and bear in mind that your scope of review here is for clear air, and you're suggesting maybe it's clear air. Yes. … I think that in the wording of the district court decision, he does consider both the period before and after August 26.

Oral argument — United States v. Samuel Navarrette-Aguilar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2015

reach the 1,000-gram threshold, or any weight threshold, if we were to expand this, necessary to establish a mandatory minimum sentence for the crime of a conspiracy to violate the Controlled Substances Act … We have to remember that the con- Pick out a thousand grams out of the air. There had to be some evidence. Right. And they didn't, the evidence that they had was overwhelming.

Oral argument — Oklahoma Firefighters Pension v. Finisar Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

Your Honor, all it says is that there was discussions over a three-month period of time. This is dynamic time period. The discussions are not finalized until December. … They don't have the air of suspicion in context.

Oral argument — Peter Crane v. United States Nuclear Regulato

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2009

It was suggested by comments in this proceeding. … To the question, there is no basis under the Hobbs Act review for making a factual record. The record comes up from the agency. Mr. Crane is a thyroid cancer patient.

Oral argument — Lopez v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2024

The petitioner again conceded this at trial because he felt that Zogny and Adetiba, the matter of Adetiba, blocked his argument, and he's right again, committing several acts of larceny over a period of … So to give him the opportunity, he gives himself a clean slate to rewrite the law, and he just rewrites Zogny.