Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
5,768 results
0.08s
Oral argument — Pangilinan v. Holder
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2009
I mean, it was never really you don't really have a clean hearing. That's my concern. Correct. … We filed within the statutory period for a motion to reopen, which is 90 days.
25 min of audioOral argument — Palaca v. Gonzales
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2005
They're just saying, on the merits of assuming credibility, he loses, boom, period. Yes, Your Honor. … And this is a ground we've been over before, but I don't have an answer that's quite clean. And you may or may not be in a position to give one.
25 min of audioOral argument — Kim v. Google LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2026
Now, again, that could mean that they were visiting either in the U.S. at the back half of the period or in Korea at the first half of the period. … My understanding is before the act or the speech at issue can be protected.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Mizrahi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2025
Congress was particularly concerned about defendants passing themselves off as another, exercising authority on behalf of another or acting on behalf of another. … So I understand, yes, the name, it shouldn't have been done, but the treasurer was not exposed, didn't have any exposure to having to clean up his credit.
25 min of audioOral argument — Gerald Eitner v. Andrew Saul
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021
Eitner has performed during the relevant period, which includes admitting walking half a mile on a flat surface, doing housework, he's doing weeding, mowing. … He's also taking care of his ailing mother, which includes driving her to appointments, cooking, cleaning, laundry. He even describes himself as her guardian at one point.
29 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Mattia
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2004
Well I think that the government has clean hands your honor. All that was bargained for was eligibility and that's what was given to him. … There was no nothing that what we needed was the judge to make the recommendation that they go to Butner and then the Europrisons would act on that. I'm unaware.
24 min of audioOral argument — United States v. HOWARD
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2004
But we- but we- and we did put in information from chief deputy and then acting Marshal Mositis as to this issue. … With respect to a point, Judge Schroeder, that you made, I think our position, of course, is you can't have a general policy, period. It has to be defendant-specific.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Hummingway
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2004
I shaved every day, I showered every day, I was clean, and I needed to keep all of my materials together so that I could present it to these people. … It's the same thing as serious obstruction conduct acting out in court.
39 min of audioOral argument — Gary Merchant v. Corizon Health, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020
One is whether the exhaustion of the administrative remedies requirement under the Prison Litigation Reform Act was completed by Mr. Merchant. … If I may start with the Prison Litigation Reform Act issue, I will then move on to the discovery and procedural sanction imposed by the district court.
32 min of audioOral argument — Sussex Financial Enterprises v. Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsban
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2011
They amortized that over a period of 30 years. That extra cost comes down to about 0.23 percent. … I understand your defense is that they were they didn't come in with clean hands, that they were part of the fraud and so forth. But isn't our review pretty narrow in this case?
34 min of audioOral argument — Sherman Bahr v. Canon USA, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2016
Legislature said, if you're having trouble getting the manufacturer to act in accordance with its obligations, you have non-conforming goods, what consumer are some of your options? … What we would have is essentially a holding that every manufacturer of every air conditioner, television set, refrigerator, camera, water heater, and so on, would be eligible to purchase parts.
33 min of audioOral argument — Friends of the Inyo v. USFS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 25, 2023
Like immediate reclamation means cleaning up the mess, planting over the holes that you've dug, but then long-term reclamation can be a different activity. … Didn't Corps amend its proposal and submit a new proposal after the comment period?
46 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Luis Pulido
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2015
It's never been our policy, that if there's been a delay, it's been due to negligence and we'll try to clean it up. … Well, we had – we have these cases that talk about the Speedy Trial Act. The Speedy Trial under the Constitution, which appears to be different from the Speedy Trial Act.
37 min of audioOral argument — Lessin v. Ford Motor Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2025
There was too much air, so it didn't work the way it was supposed to. … Not over the class period for sure, Your Honor.
31 min of audioOral argument — Galina Medvedeva v. City of Kirkland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017
Yeah, the, the, the inference, though, is in one situation you're saying she shut the bathroom door as an act to physically resist the police coming into the bathroom. … The water was already cleaned up. It was already stopped.
32 min of audioOral argument — Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. Electron Hydro LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024
The District Court's holding that simply impeding fish passage is take under the Endangered Species Act is wrong as a matter of law. … What we're arguing about here is a section of the dam that was installed by Electron after the artificial turf blowout – the issue that led to Clean Water Act violations.
42 min of audioOral argument — Ghashghaee v. INS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2003
But the question really is, does he infringe on the law when he – does he break the law when he commits certain acts? … Petitioner admitted that he worked as an informant for the Savak to assist in the primary objective of cleaning the country of people who were opposed to the Shah's regime.
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. City of Santa Monica
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008
At any rate, that particular danger, the danger of aircraft crashing in the air, would not be averted by this ordinance. This ordinance protects against overruns. … And the public interest would favor the agency's position that for this limited period of time, you should cool it until the agency proceeding is finished.
37 min of audioOral argument — Rejuvi Laboratory, Inc. v. Maria Corso
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2021
And in fact, the Uniform Act not quite so clean as that, meaning service of notice can, I mean, the colloquial term is tag jurisdiction. … I think there was something like of this particular product, $4,000 if my memory is correct, over a four year period. So very limited sales to the country of Australia.
29 min of audioOral argument — Marvin Horne v. AGRI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2011
Just in the period between 1997 and 2007. Is this in the record? It is not. It is not, Your Honor. What you're about to cite is not in the record? Correct, Your Honor. What's the source? … That is the place at which the raisins are stemmed, seeded, cleaned, sorted, and packed into market.
35 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.