Documents

Oral argument — People v. Montilla

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2022

period. … act.

Oral argument — People v. Sundell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2025

The State had the full 160-day period. Mr. Sundell didn't absence himself from the court during that period. … It's one act. So that's what also tells you it's one act, is if we had charged a blend, it would have been one act. Thank you.

Oral argument — Young v. City of Pekin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2015

Now, they have an ordinance that says you can take this property, period. You don't need a warrant. Well, why do they do that? That's the next question, I guess. … And I just ask that perhaps you read that case and think about my comments, because I've got a few more points to make.

Oral argument — Norman v. Brandt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2009

He could not give an estimate of the speed, but he was clear that the distance between the two vehicles during that period of time remained constant. … That is not a plan under the Tortious Act. The only claim in the Tortious Act is Brandt's act of speeding, but there's no evidence that there was a plan to speed. Am I wrong in any of that?

Oral argument — People v. Mibbs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2012

Mistakes by an agency that an employee of that agency acted on. All mistakes. … And the officer, the agent here acted on that mistake. Does that mean that we can't apply good faith? I don't think so.

Oral argument — Morawicz v. Hynes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2010

So they're not acting in their own capacity to somehow get ahead. … So during that period of time, that $970,000, was that interest, should that interest have been returned?

Oral argument — Wittendorf v. Worthington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2012

Section 607 of the Illinois Dissolution Act sets forth how this court or how the district court decides visitations in these cases. … There's a period where he acts well, and then there's a period where he overreacts, gets angry and violent, and then he feels sorry for it.

Oral argument — Monterey Coal Company v. IWCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2018

Because at that point, they say, quote, it is ordered that respondent pay petitioner a sum of $567.70 per week for a period of 425 weeks, as provided in Section 8D2 of the Act. … The remedial act to be liberally construed to do justice to this man who's dying right now. The policy of the act would suggest that the decretal should be followed.

Oral argument — Marriage of Gerber

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2024

First of all, for most of that time period, the children were minors, and of course Mr. Gerber and Mrs. … Well, I want to address some of the comments. Maybe you should get closer to the microphone. I'm sorry. I think the comment about accounts payable for the dissipation claim is spot on. If Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2013

I think we're talking about a much shorter period of time. Actually, I thought the record was that Ms. … She made the original composite sketch of the defendant, which was originally aired. So my timeline, the way I read it, is Mr.

Oral argument — Pitulla v. Hartz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2009

She's identified three incidents, and they're isolated incidents over a six-month period of time. … I do want to make one comment on the failure to hold board meetings. A developer board is not required to hold board meetings.

Oral argument — People v. Bailey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017

I will be somewhat brief in my comments. I believe our brief has addressed most of these things. … This position is in a short period.

Oral argument — Miller v. Hecox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2012

Acco law, you have to show that to act and it's such act an act and then abandoned the risk of harm. There's is one, you know, one tha of duty and two that as a an increase in the harm. … The outcome would ha them sitting there for 3 the period of time was an to do and checking on him increase of harm was neve of harm was never increas being present.

Oral argument — RG Construction Services v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2014

We provided Arbitrator O'Malley with the Poletti case, and the — So is Section 16 of the Act unconstitutional? … They have the doctors comment on causal connection, and that's their way of trying to get it in and abrogating my right to cross-examine witnesses.

Oral argument — City of Lake Forest v. Martinez-Galarza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2025

He observed my client for a reasonable period of time, operating a reasonable distance. … It went from an inquiry about a penny offense to an inquiry about a criminal act, a potentially criminal act. Well, it is technically a criminal act all the time because he's being stopped.

Oral argument — People v. Leader

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2021

60 questions in a half hour period, at least 60 questions. … Well, if that's the case, then if and when they arrived, she could disavow or refuse to make any further comment. Would either or both of those constitute a withdrawal or a non-crime?

Oral argument — Akemann v. Quinn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2014

filled for that period of time. … I'm going to make the proverbial comment, which I know you always love, that's not the issue in front of you today. Here it is, but I'm curious, what if the legislature had?

Oral argument — People v. Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2012

And all the precedent that either I or the state cited shows that the state needs to act with due diligence. … The record indicates that the court was concerned only with the two-week period and said, I mean, the court's only comments were, okay, you submitted it on the 13th.

Oral argument — Duhig v. Orr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2018

It doesn't even specify the time period. It doesn't even specify the number. … We don't even have the time period. We just have the plaintiff has some emails and phone calls with the defendant.

Oral argument — In the Interests of Sophia J.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 21, 2019

And so there had been a period of time. I believe Tim's testimony was he had last physically seen the children before they were taken in November. In August of 2017, had a visit with them. … And here's another important thing that I think that Guardian Ed Wyden commented on. If I'm DCFS, I think it's worth, at this point, a mental health evaluation, which he's refused to do.