Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Fernando Gonzales-Vergara

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2011

I'll not comment on that one. We also know that he attested that he stated that the last time he entered the country as of 2008 was on August 12th, 2003. … One of the things that bothers, of course, is that there's a lawyer representing the defendant during all this period of time. There's no indication it is an incompetent lawyer.

Oral argument — United States v. Chan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2020

There was a course change, and you have to let air traffic control know that there's a course change. And they never did that here. They have the burden. … And Chan ultimately bought $1.5 million of Merrimack stock during this time period. Can I just ask one last question about materiality?

Oral argument — United States v. Jazzman Brown, (Consolidated with Jazzman Brown v. United States)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2017

The idea is that whether it's a multi-count case or a single-count case, the slate has been wiped clean. There's nothing left on the books. … And two, the court has the discretion to do something, so defense presence wouldn't be useless if it was just a ministerial act. So, one, the entire sentence is vacated, it's light, white, clean.

Oral argument — Fore River Residents Against the Comp.Station v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2023

Was former chairman issuing the devastating comment. That my clients read, which stated. … And a petitioner must challenge the aggrieving order under section 717 are of the natural gas act.

Oral argument — LM Insurance Corp. v. City of Sycamore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2023

That clearly includes things that happen over a considerable period of time. So the idea that this could be that because it was going on for some period of time. … And the court said the inside of the building, because it was air, was not atmosphere.

Oral argument — United States v. Mcneal

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2024

It had a 60 month sentence in mind Explicitly based upon the 39-year criminal history not related at all to the enhancement With respect to the comments that the Fifth Circuit can't make me rule on The … So I would submit that the 60 months is plucked out of thin air Without any explanation of why it should be six 60 months I would note that Johnson which the government relies on is a plain error case

Oral argument — Robert McChesney v. Caroline C. Hunter

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

If the commission finds probable cause to believe there is a mandatory conciliation period and at the end of that conciliation period, if there is not an agreement reached, the commission may make a determination … In this case, the commission's waiver of notice and comment and also waiver of a 30-day time period after its decision on the regulations squarely falls within the good cause exception.

Oral argument — United States v. Cleve-Allan George

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Stone for him to be the qualified person to conduct the air monitoring. And also, it's important to note that, with respect to the air monitoring, Mr. … George throughout the whole period. We don't know what was in those packages.

Oral argument — Ingram v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2003

Even though she went to a clean and sober house several times, she became the house president. She was really trying. And I actually refused to take this case originally. … The significance of that comment in context of his analysis is that she has been able to function without alcohol.

Oral argument — Millie Ogden v. Wells Fargo Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2016

I would add the predicate act so that Judge Gee could then focus and say that we do have a directness of injury on the approximate cause. But you already had the predicate acts there. … So when we look into what damages are to business or property, we look to the predicate act, and if there's a nexus, then I'm going to say, the harm and identity fraud victim incurs to clean up the mess

Oral argument — Feliciano v. Dept. of Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2024

My understanding is that the National Emergencies Act ended all pending national emergencies in 1976. … They wanted a clean, bright-line rule. Everyone contributes during a national emergency.

Oral argument — Leslie Grussing v. Orthopedic and Sports Medicine

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2018

Strictly speaking, the comment, not sure, Your Honor, would not comport with the burden of proof. … And under that standard here, we again have the comment made, the not sure comment, followed by Judge Shaw's follow the instructions, and then followed by the correction by defense counsel concerning the

Oral argument — Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2019

And as such, this permit cannot be delegated under the Clean Water Act to a state. … have under the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Robert Comer v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2014

Comer acted wrongfully, if he removed himself from the situation, that changes the calculus. But what if you take out the period, which we all know, I mean, punctuation is added by court reporters. … Right, but one of the things the court did say was made a comment about where that period is located.

Oral argument — Blueport Company v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2008

the Air Force. … Violating the anti-circumvention provisions of the Millennium Act looks to me like it's blatantly clearly a tort, in which case it's clearly outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims, period

Oral argument — Tyll v. Stanley Black And Decker Life

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2021

So under an abuse of discretion standard, one court held that the insurance company had acted reasonably in not paying benefits to Dr. Yasko's widow. … It would have been very simple to do it by providing clean language that mirrored 501D in the section dealing with the responsibilities and authorities of Aetna.

Oral argument — FedEx Home Delivery v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2016

The issue in this case is whether the FedEx home delivery contractors are independent contractors within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. … But in FedEx, well, the poem was out of thin air. As is the statement that we have considered all the common law factors, I'm looking at FedEx won.

Oral argument — Hughes Communications India Pr v. The DirecTV Group, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2023

But I'm going back to this sort of conception, this idea that new company gets to start with a clean slate and isn't going to be carrying baggage from the last chapter. … If that's sort of the concept, don't license fees for a period of time before the new company started?

Oral argument — Estate of Jones v. City of Springfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2023

The purpose is it's cited in the Van Meter case that I cited in my brief where the Supreme Court said the act the Immunity Act serves to protect local public entities and public employees from liability … up the bottom they took out the diving area so it was reopened for a period of time and then ultimately closed and there's no evidence that it closed because of this drowning or drownings so that you

Oral argument — Lata v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2004

She had to show that her marriage was, one, in good faith, and, two, during that time period, she was subject to abuse. … McVeigh came clean, so to speak, and said the marriage was indeed a ruse.