Documents

Oral argument — Fedorov v. Bondi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025

And then perhaps that age limitation, meaning to the certain period of time, actually was referred to the conscription prior to February 24 of 2022. … And then he cites a bunch of cases that have to do with deserting to avoid participating in acts condemned by the international community. Right.

Oral argument — WPP Luxembourg Gamma Three Sar v. Spot Runner, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2011

You had three separate sales of stock by the founders over a 15-month period with no notice to WPP. … When acting together, they hold the majority. And they're talking about the battery and index investors. When acting together, dot, dot, dot, they hold the majority of voting shares.

Oral argument — United States v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2017

So it's materially different because she wasn't giving advice at all on the I-140 petition, period. Who knows how the law had changed or not. … It says, the government must show that the defendant acted with criminal intent, i.e., that's a violation of the statute. That's a mandatory requirement.

Oral argument — Sticka v. Casserino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2004

Let's say that the actual title isn't going to be transferred to me because it's being held in trust during the period that I'm signing off on this contract. … Sticker did not make a motion to assume this lease within the 60-day period. At that time, the lease was rejected. That is, it's no longer estate property.

Oral argument — Feldman v. Commissioner IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2005

But you're acting like there's nothing in between. If it said the Secretary will relieve such individual of such liability, then I think you might have something. … And for a period of time, he was making substantially less than $130,000.

Oral argument — United States v. Tammy Thomas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2009

Thomas' statements about her – because her comments about Arnold had nothing to do with Balco. And we're not saying the Court didn't have jurisdiction over all of them. … As a result of her striking appearance, during the time period it was proven that she received nerbolithone from Arnold, the evidence showed she knowingly used steroids.

Oral argument — EPIC v. Ann Carlson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2020

Now the plain language of the D4 category not only shows that it's inapplicable but the comment period for the rule never indicated anything of the scope of a timber sale and rather it said it was for … So, and then the goes on to say the forest service will come back later and clean it up. So what this showing is this is a commercial timber sale.

Oral argument — Kuba v. State of California

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2003

Well, you just heard, for example, a comment by Mr. Blatt that the content neutral, is it really content neutral, number one. … When the government seeks to introduce extrinsic act evidence, the crucial determination the district court must make is that

Oral argument — TANADGUSIX v. HUBER

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2004

There is no plausible meaning to that document other than the scenario that there would be rehabilitation of this vessel to fix it up and clean it up for some temporary period in Hawaii. … There was a one-year sort of grace period, if you will, 12 months to put it into use pursuant to the transfer document itself.

Oral argument — William B. Rooz v. Roberta Kimmel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

She got a clean, unfettered discharge. Finally, in 1995, the judgment is entered. And then it's not against the wife, but it's against the husband, David. … So she, I don't see how any liability on her part, period. If we have your argument, thank you. A few brief points, Your Honor. Opening up the creditor can go after other assets.

Oral argument — Rooz v. Kimmel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

She got a clean, unfettered discharge. Finally, in 1995, the judgment is entered. And then it's not against the wife, but it's against the husband, David. … So she – I don't see how any liability on her part, period. If we have your argument, thank you. A few brief points, Your Honor. Opening up the creditor can go after other assets.

Oral argument — United States v. Pheasant

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2024

So when it addresses a case about air pollution in the EPA, the the fact that they're addressing air pollution sort of gives rise to like it sort of animates the decision about the the scope of the delegation … And some commentators have talked about this recently. Justice Gorsuch, when he was a judge on the Tenth Circuit, talked about it.

Oral argument — Shayna Lathus v. City of Huntington Beach

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2022

In other words, I think we know that political qualifications are completely irrelevant to cleaning up the streets. Right. … But there is a comment in the Elrod case to the effect that, that uses the term advisor.

Oral argument — Murray v. Alaska Airlines, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2008

The differences are significant because in the court action, there's a much more extended period of time available. … First of all, this is the whistleblower statute, Federal Act, right? Right. This is not an invitation to a high school dance.

Oral argument — Frank Cheatham v. City of Phoenix

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2017

The nacho cheese machine was cleaned up. The pretzel jar never came back. … Was it inappropriate for Cheatham to comment on this? No, it was not inappropriate. Why is it not inappropriate for him to comment on this? Why is it not inappropriate for Chief Cheatham to comment?

Oral argument — United States v. LEICHNER

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2006

But for a period of time, probably at least two or three years, there were a number of legitimate investments which the records disclosed. So it looks to me, at least, as if Mr. … Could you comment just a little bit on the argument that the loss calculation is wrong because for a number of years it was a legitimate business genuinely investing its investors' money?

Oral argument — USA v. Board of Directors of the Truc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2013

Well, no, the Settlement Act directed us to get the water for – Yeah. So we had a statutory duty to try to get this water. … You had perhaps the opportunity, had they brought it up, to reconsider your mandate, but as you pointed out in your earlier comments, they didn't ask the court.

Oral argument — Muyingo v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2006

And, in fact, the immigration judge commented on that during his holding, that that isn't a contradiction. … The reason that the Real ID Act does not impact that decision is because the Real ID Act added 1252A2D, which expands jurisdiction if it was previously precluded prior to the enactment of Real ID Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Ortiz-Lopez

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2004

I would agree with your comments, Judge Trott, especially if this case were coming up directly from an appeal from the Immigration Board. … , whether or not the air or prejudice the defendant or not, and that's the record we need to make in front of the district court judge.

Oral argument — Anniversary Mining Claims, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2021

We know from what we have is that there's an allegation that in 1952, the United States established Nellis Air Force Base and that included condemning a portion of the road that was used up until that … So, again, for purposes of an easement by necessity, the condemnation would be the relevant time period.