Documents

Oral argument — 1-19-2159

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021

Didn't they reserve the right throughout that period of time to dismiss? Well, the state always reserves the right to audit. … Under the Act, a private party known as a Relator may- Let me ask you one of the comments that was just made by Mr. Hearst. If we follow Lindblom, do we have to reverse?

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Bandy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2011

It was for the safety of the child and the violent acts of the mother. Was this all testified to before Judge Day? On the order of protection? No, on this. … And that's what Judge Day commented during the trial. He said, as long as the F.S. is called, it doesn't mean someone is a nasty parent or unwilling to cooperate.

Oral argument — People v. Conkle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2010

Bush for basically all his testimony periodically, would make statements. … And under the circumstances, we argue that there was not sufficient evidence presented by the prosecution to show that there was any intentional act on behalf of my client.

Oral argument — People v. Camper

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2024

And then when he does so, he clearly doesn't raise the time period that's being referenced now on October 1 through October 22 of the previous year. … I'm assuming from Judge Zenov's comment that it's the court's opinion that there is no legal obligation to make that requirement.

Oral argument — People v. Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2011

Is that the court acts as essentially a landmark If you will To consider evidence And to make a determination Of what is the appropriate treatment For the defendant So I don't think it's correct To say … Per se What happened This is an involuntary Demonstration Of psychotropic Indications In that case There was a Stipulation It was a verbal Stipulation It was Found by this court The court Prefaced its comments

Oral argument — 1-18-2392

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2021

It was filed 10 years after the plea, which is well beyond the three years provided for under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. … There is an exception to the three year period, and that is when the delay is not due to the petitioners culpable negligence.

Oral argument — Schwartz v. Illinois Human Rights Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2024

She only worked for the respondents for seven months, and the deemed-admitted sexual harassment occurred over a two-month period. … Well, the word would be limited by the act. So if they're familiar with the act, they would know that the act provides for lost wages. It provides for bad interest.

Oral argument — Estate of Jerniganv. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010

Your Honors, this is a case about a man who had great responsibility with his company, who acted as a general agent for his employer for years. … And it does track his behavior over a long period of time. Would it be nice? Would it be easier for me? Certainly, if there was something memorialized in there.

Oral argument — People v. Perez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2014

Are there no further questions or comments? Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Cassidy. Mr. Austin. May I please court? Counsel. … Payton conflated the act of spitting with the defendant's act of actually placing his mouth on NG's vagina, but nowhere in the record did NG contradict or attempt to correct Ms.

Oral argument — Aguilera v. Crystal Lake Park District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2013

And I'm not aware of any case that says, you know, there has to be a particular time period before within the subsequent action. … Time period or a specific number of prior incidents is correct, you're saying? Correct. Wasn't there no fence from 2000 to 2003?

Oral argument — Rodriguez v. Northeast IL Reg. Commuter Railroad Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2011

That for that period of time that Dr. … I looked and I couldn't find one, but the committee comments for Rule 213 talk about, under Rule 213G, talk about the fact that there is no requirement for disclosure on the cross-examining party.

Oral argument — Urban v. ITI Intermodal, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2025

After a period of time, they became romantically involved and decided to marry. They were given options. … So the Illinois Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on marital status and the definition of marital status in the Illinois Human Rights Act is the legal status of being married, single, separated

Oral argument — Johnson v. Niew Legal Partners

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2012

So you can simply say there was legal advice given, period. … She had been acting in an attorney-client relationship.

Oral argument — Allen v. State Health and Family Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2015

Couldn't it be that the additional documents pertain to this different, longer period of time that was set forth in Representative Kaye's request, and both responses could have been perfectly adequate? … Before you get to that, and I know you're running out of time, but I just want to comment on something. The plaintiff filed his motion to reconsider on February 20, 2014.

Oral argument — Wittendorf v. Worthington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2012

Section 607 of the Illinois Dissolution Act sets forth how this court or how the district court decides visitations in these cases. … There's a period where he acts well, and then there's a period where he overreacts, gets angry and violent, and then he feels sorry for it.

Oral argument — People v. Dahms

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2015

This case isn't about which of the people was acting reasonably on the sidewalk. … Otherwise, what it allows the state to do is, on its whim, depending on how it wants to charge, to charge the exact same act two different ways.

Oral argument — First Mid Wealth Management Co. v. Burke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2022

He paid the money back within a time period that was commensurate with what the evidence showed to be typical in these situations. Mr. … Cassidy made a comment about peer speculation, and I think what he's asking you to do is speculate much like the trial court did as to what the terms of the contract were.

Oral argument — Borchers v. Franciscan Tertiary Province of the Sacred Heart, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2011

And she makes a number of accusations, and I use that word very deliberately because on the second page of that letter she says, I can't prove this comment, but I think Father Larry or Mike Frigo affected … Under the Stored Wire Act, which it was represented that's a civil statute, that is incorrect.

Oral argument — Aureus Medical Group v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2021

But to be clear, the commission found that act to be the final act in forging the contract. … Without any questions, I have no further comment other than to say, please, we're not certain about this being on its face.

Oral argument — Naden v. Firefighters Pension Fund Sugar Grove

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2017

I would argue that the intent of the statute is you're unable to perform the duties of a firefighter, period. You can't do it in this department, you can't do it in any department. … Marzullo's comment on regardless union. You look at that disciplinary act. There's no provision in that disciplinary act for potential, for potential. And that's what it all came down to.