Documents

Oral argument — Cano v. City of New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2016

He's also – in his declaration, he identifies log records about efforts to clean the cells. Well, certainly there's a factual dispute as to whether they were cleaned at all. … An intentional act can't be negligent. It has to be an intentional act by the officer who recognizes a condition and does nothing about it. That's intentional. Right.

Oral argument — Stephen Schmid v. Sonoma Clean Power

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

He made a judgment not to opt-out, but does he have to go through the act of opting-out? Does he have to sit down and go ahead and take the action to put a stamp on the envelope? … It appears to be to the whole Sonoma Clean Power Program. Well, that's true.

Oral argument — People v. Cleary

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2013

Well, when you say it was clean, I just wondered because I've smoked a lot of oil in my day in the garage and I've never thought about cleaning bleach. … And also, Your Honor, it bears recalling that the state relied on the Domestic Violence Act, exception to the hearsay rule, and that act provides that it should only be used when the state basically has

Oral argument — United States v. Webster

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2011

Yes, there were violent acts. … And principally with regard to the two underage individuals that he trafficked for the greatest period of time. And that was HB and ML.

Oral argument — Ana Flores v. Rod Danielson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2012

The whole exclusively linked rationale is premised or founded on how the three-year period acted pre-BFSEPA, before the new legislation came in. It acted exclusively as a multiplier. … Because we wanted to keep the case clean.

Oral argument — Feliciano v. Dept. of Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2024

My understanding is that the National Emergencies Act ended all pending national emergencies in 1976. … They wanted a clean, bright-line rule. Everyone contributes during a national emergency.

Oral argument — Re: Stefler, Cenex Harvest v. US Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2005

When it concluded on the Holder and New Course argument, remember there, the court said, no, you're not an HGC because you didn't act in good faith. … Come in with clean hands? Where's the bank's clean hands in this case?

Oral argument — United States v. American Commercial Lines, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2017

That comes under the Clean Water Act pre-OPA. … Under that act, the mere existence of the contract was sufficient to defeat the defense under the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Sierra Club v. State Water Control Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018

And again, without a valid Section 401 certification, the Clean Water Act prevents any activity subject to a Federal license that would lead to a Clean Water Act regulated discharge. … Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Doctor, David H., Sr. v. Prindaville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2010

Docter is raising the alternative first under the Interest Act and then under the equitable considerations. … He wanted the exact same clean-up damages, clean this place up, and what it's going to cost me to get an NFR letter. Those compensatory damages are exactly the same.

Oral argument — United States v. Chan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2020

There was a course change, and you have to let air traffic control know that there's a course change. And they never did that here. They have the burden. … And Chan ultimately bought $1.5 million of Merrimack stock during this time period. Can I just ask one last question about materiality?

Oral argument — Vasilios Zannikos v. Oil Inspections (U.S.A.), Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

With regards to cleaning, cleaning of tanks, Mr. Zanikas testified that cleaning is heavily regulated by MARPOL requirements. … And it says reckless disregard of the requirements of the act means failure to make adequate inquiry into whether conduct is in compliance with the act.

Oral argument — Ingram v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2003

Even though she went to a clean and sober house several times, she became the house president. She was really trying. And I actually refused to take this case originally. … The significance of that comment in context of his analysis is that she has been able to function without alcohol.

Oral argument — Bad River Band of the Lake Sup v. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2024

Eve first asked this question, you said, well, if we did anything, it would violate the Clean Water Act. … be consistent with the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Sea Hawk Seafoods v. Gutierrez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2008

So, again, the Magnuson Act is, in addition to providing that short period of review, Your Honor, the Magnuson Act affords a very extensive process for public involvement. … Well, I think that, Your Honor, that would be correct because the Magnuson Act limitation period applies to regulations promulgated under the Act. But this is a challenge to regulations.

Oral argument — Williams v. County of Los Angeles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2026

I'm looking at Bradford and one of the comments, it says after the discussion that you referenced in this case, it says, we recognize, however, that the result may be different under other factual circumstances … And the reason is because that the later conviction is separate and clean compared to the first one. And so when you're challenging that first conviction...

Oral argument — Brown v. Hand

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2003

He alleged that he was gasping for air and almost died. But yet his roommate didn't feel it was worthy of comment. It wasn't worthy of summoning prison officials to help assist him in this case. … So there's a span of two weeks that the air went out and he did suffer the severe attack.

Oral argument — Susheela Narayanan v. British Airways

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2013

It calls it a limitation period. There is one court, Dixon v. American Airlines, where the court actually describes the limitation period as the repose period. … of two years, period.

Oral argument — 1-19-1285

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2021

So you have periods of time where she has open exposed wounds that are supposed to have duoderm dressing. Hydrocolide is the generic name that's supposed to be in place to act as a barrier. … And then they come back later and they have to clean it.

Oral argument — Young v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2016

So if you don't comply with a trial period plan, you may not be entitled to any other loan modification. … Young has to come to this court with clean hands with regard to the relief she's seeking, the very claim she's seeking. And here, she doesn't have clean hands.