Documents

Oral argument — Surlock v. Starcevic

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2020

act. … There has been no public comment that I am aware of. So your position is we should not hold off, is that correct? That is absolutely correct, yes. And I think that's your position, Mr. Reese.

Oral argument — Morawicz v. Hynes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2010

So they're not acting in their own capacity to somehow get ahead. … So during that period of time, that $970,000, was that interest, should that interest have been returned?

Oral argument — Hawkins v. Coffman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2025

Well, and I think just ñ I mean, there's a lot to go through here in a short period of time. … And then the only other remaining comment is the invasion of privacy.

Oral argument — Frulla v. The Hyatt Corporation and Champion Exposition Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2018

Second, the plaintiff did breach the standard of care and did cause his own injuries, period, end stop. What was Anton Glauwek's testimony? He doesn't tell you that. … Gee versus Treese, disclosures less than 60 days before trial does not act as an automatic bar to preserving expert testimony.

Oral argument — People v. Montilla

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2022

period. … act.

Oral argument — People v. Sundell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2025

The State had the full 160-day period. Mr. Sundell didn't absence himself from the court during that period. … It's one act. So that's what also tells you it's one act, is if we had charged a blend, it would have been one act. Thank you.

Oral argument — Trackman v. Michela

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2019

This is the act. This Court affirmed the dismissal of count three with prejudice. Yes, it did. That's a final order. That's a final judgment. … Once again, in Ward, the court ruled that there had been no final judgment, and therefore raised it due to comment, did not fire the refiling of the complaint.

Oral argument — People v. Gaines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2026

Gaines made this hyperbolic comment about killing himself if J.C. rejected his marriage proposal, not if she refused the sex act. This is the only evidence the state cites to prove the force element. … But for the protection of the public, because as the trial court found, this defendant had terrorized J.C. for an extended period of time.

Oral argument — Borchers v. Franciscan Tertiary Province of the Sacred Heart, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2011

And she makes a number of accusations, and I use that word very deliberately because on the second page of that letter she says, I can't prove this comment, but I think Father Larry or Mike Frigo affected … Under the Stored Wire Act, which it was represented that's a civil statute, that is incorrect.

Oral argument — State v. Fox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 19, 2023

And the fact is the relator doesn't just sue for the state under the Illinois False Claims Act. She also sues herself. … And the court commented that that was not even a close case. The same observations apply here.

Oral argument — Teel v. Illinois Department of Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2025

Within a short, very short period of time. Yes. And let me give you the... … Your efforts at trying to create a claim of direct review is based entirely on the comment of your client.

Oral argument — Miller v. Hecox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2012

Acco law, you have to show that to act and it's such act an act and then abandoned the risk of harm. There's is one, you know, one tha of duty and two that as a an increase in the harm. … The outcome would ha them sitting there for 3 the period of time was an to do and checking on him increase of harm was neve of harm was never increas being present.

Oral argument — City of Lake Forest v. Martinez-Galarza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2025

He observed my client for a reasonable period of time, operating a reasonable distance. … It went from an inquiry about a penny offense to an inquiry about a criminal act, a potentially criminal act. Well, it is technically a criminal act all the time because he's being stopped.

Oral argument — Mackey v. DeFranco

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

Counsel brought up the conversion time period for the statute of repose. I'd like to comment very briefly about that. The timeline was that Dr. … limitations period.

Oral argument — Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago v. Terra Foundation for American Art

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2011

I have several points I'd like to make, and I would like to address some of the comments that were made by Mr. Gistenson. … The question of whether Officer Phillips acted appropriately is something that has to be considered under all the circumstances before the court.

Oral argument — Ameren Illinois Company v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

I was going to say no comment, but I guess I'm on the hot seat here. … Well, the commission had in the comment case not added the accumulated depreciation because of the pro forma capital adjustments and, of course, we were reversed.

Oral argument — Renchen v. Renchen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2014

Opposing counsel made the comment that at this October 2011 meeting that Richard was provided with an accounting, that, in fact, is Exhibit B, the VBR trust accounting, which is really a check ledger. … Errors are limited in Section 2.1 of the Probate Act to individuals.

Oral argument — Monterey Coal Company v. IWCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2018

Because at that point, they say, quote, it is ordered that respondent pay petitioner a sum of $567.70 per week for a period of 425 weeks, as provided in Section 8D2 of the Act. … The remedial act to be liberally construed to do justice to this man who's dying right now. The policy of the act would suggest that the decretal should be followed.

Oral argument — Pisani v. City of Springfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2017

Two comments on that. … Just as the legislature is presumed to act with full knowledge of all prior legislation, the drafters of a constitutional provision are presumed to know about existing laws and constitutional provisions

Oral argument — Puskar v. Krco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2013

So, the Belgrade Church says you have authority to act on their behalf. Correct. And that comes from? … It's a constitutional act that's required. Let's say that the term is three years.