Documents

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Sheridan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2013

The court went both ways during the period of time this matter's been under devising. … Whatever she can to use the Domestic Violence Act to gain advantage in the Marriage and Dissolution Act or any other way, it's consistent with her email saying, hey, he's not going to be seeing these children

Oral argument — Reed v. Country Place-Apartments

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2016

The act doesn't apply, period. It's a straight negligence, you know, defective condition case. And that's a Green thing. … He was hired to clean them, and he did that on November 30, 2010. He testified that at that time he cleaned everything out of them. I cleaned it all, is what he said.

Oral argument — People v. Brodsky

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2025

Brodsky's comments and threatened to make more comments. There aren't any more aspects to this particular proceeding than solely his comments on the Banfield News Nation podcast. … Brodsky filed kind of out of thin air. Again, this order was entered in April of 2024.

Oral argument — Air-Con, Inc. v. Daikin Applied Latin America, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2025

The day before- Have they defined good faith as minimally giving you notice and a wind down period? Have they been that specific? Let me put it to you this way. Dyking manufactures air conditioners. … Your Honor, I most respectfully submit that Dykin just rewrote Act 75.

Oral argument — Kuempel v. ETX Transmissions, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2013

There was a five-day grace period, isn't there? There was not a five-day grace period. There was an indication in the record that from time to time ETX would pay the rent later than the first day. … Gatlin's comments that you rely upon fly in the face of your abandonment argument. You're saying they abandoned it. You're arguing both sides of it.

Oral argument — United States v. Delano

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2020

We're here on plain air. Could you walk us through how this is a plain air? Yes, Your Honor. … The district court and counsel… Oh, it's plain air. You say it's air automatically because we're looking at the effective date.

Oral argument — Knox Creek Coal Corporation v. Secretary of Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2015

Congress, when it enacted the act, could have determined that all violations were SNS. … This case, yes, there is in the Mine Act about methane and other things going back to the 1977 or the 69 Act.

Oral argument — Isern v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2016

Period. I mean, there's a whole bunch of cases that say otherwise, Judge. We'll call our attention to it. I'd like to hear one. I just gave you one, Curtis. … In Mlarsuk, these two couples clean homes, and they clean a home, and then they go home for lunch together.

Oral argument — William Tedards, Jr. v. Doug Ducey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2019

Let me ask you, I think we were writing on a clean slate. … We previously talked about the fact that the state does have one Senator acting unlike what would happen in the House.

Oral argument — People v. Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2009

Basically, that's a reckless act. Right. … However, during that period of time, the mother actually cooked the full meal and was caring for a nine-and-a-half-month-old child at the time.

Oral argument — Wild Fish Conservancy v. Kenneth Salazar

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2013

The Washington Department of Ecology reviewed hatchery operations under a provision of the Clean Water Act, Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. … And here, the agency does it through its biological opinions for the ESA and under the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Tracy Conley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2017

Conley had met with a group of would-be robbers on the morning of November 1, 2011, and met again with them later that same day when the leader of the group, Mirian Flowers, acting on information provided … Not a single tool or construction item or cleaning item was moved from one van to the other.

Oral argument — Botsch and Associates, CPA's, LLC. v. Blackfoot Properties, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2026

Regardless of any longer period of time for commencing such claim as may be set by law, now here comes the important sentence. … The contract provides that they'll provide the tax work and clean up books. That's what the contract says.

Oral argument — ATELIERS DE LA HAUTE v. BROETJE AUTO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

O'Reilly's declaration, he said that at that period of time, they were looking at four-groove tubes. … The assertion in the patent is that the problem is they needed to get the air around the rivet heads in some way or another so that the air was all over the tube instead of just in the back pushing.

Oral argument — Gassner v. Raynor Mfg.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2011

They had to go back in and clean it out for that infection. … The Supreme Court very clearly in air safety said, wait a minute, you have to protect against the vested interests later on of the parties.

Oral argument — Dehne v. City of Reno

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2003

The two provisions are such that the public comment period is simply reserved for making comments, things you want to address and say that they didn't get the snow off the streets here the day before yesterday … You can make any comment, a public comment at the beginning, the public comment period on any subject, but you cannot make comment during that period on matters on the agenda item.

Oral argument — United States v. Mcneal

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2024

It had a 60 month sentence in mind Explicitly based upon the 39-year criminal history not related at all to the enhancement With respect to the comments that the Fifth Circuit can't make me rule on The … So I would submit that the 60 months is plucked out of thin air Without any explanation of why it should be six 60 months I would note that Johnson which the government relies on is a plain error case

Oral argument — CA State Legislative Board v. FRA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2004

Well, they do it for long periods of time, the railroad, so they'll have a permanent space for the railroad employees. It's not a day-by-day type lease. … They say, all right, Motel X, set aside 20 rooms for us until our lease runs out, whatever that period is. And it's usually for a year or longer even.

Oral argument — People v. Wilhelm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2025

This was objectively unreasonable for counsel to act against his client's interests. … We have to send it back to him and clean it up. Do we have jurisdiction to...

Oral argument — Preferred Meal Systems, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 21, 2017

That was clean. Now that was a CT with contrast. … I'll limit my comments to what's in the record. Yeah, this is the CT scan that you referenced. It's dated October 16, 2013. It's on page 201 of the record, and they both comment about L5.