Documents

Oral argument — Ahmad Nawaz v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2024

At some point, the inconsistencies start to pile up, and it doesn't take much under the real ID act. … I didn't hear your other comment just a minute ago.

Oral argument — Bd of Trustees Glazing Health v. Shannon Chambers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019

, for the two-year period. … But I mean, should we, if we don't, if we want to have a clean mootness standard, should we just get rid of that confusing language in the other cases and go back to City of Mesquite?

Oral argument — 3-50433 USA v. Tirouda

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2004

In this case, it indicates he was retired, and it covers specifically the time period. That alone was not the only basis. … Now, from that comment, and having been there, what we were looking at was the veneer pattern.

Oral argument — Pacific Surf Designs, Inc. v. Whitewater West Industries, Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2024

I understood your earlier comments to be that you can't group together a series of lawful acts and then say you have an anti competitive, unlawful acts. Yes. … There's a different element of a Sherman Act Section 2 claim that has to harm competition.

Oral argument — United States v. Roberts

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2008

It looked like the big area of concern here is factor five for the safety valve, that is whether he came clean with his full knowledge and understanding of his criminal activity. … Your Honor, those are the comments I have. I would stand for questions or allow counsel to make his remarks. Thank you. Thank you.

Oral argument — SANCHEZ v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2005

I'm Eric Isakson of the Lear Act Coghlan, representing the plaintiffs and appellants in this matter, which deals with the sanctity of the home, the most sacred space in our constitutional Fourth Amendment … And the applicant said, well, all the clothes are clean or dirty. So it went to the dirty clothes and picked it up. Well, all right.

Oral argument — Pickett v. Duncan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2003

I found no affirmative comment in the third trial until he's filed his motion for a new trial. Okay. … And also, petitioner mentioned that he didn't have clean clothes, which may have been another reason for his decision not to discuss that.

Oral argument — knollenberg v. harmoniic, inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2005

Huddleston, the Supreme Court said the Securities Act's remedies in the 33 Act and the 34 Act are cumulative. They don't preclude one another. You add them up together. … They quote, Harmonic shares declined over 20% today due to comments from their 10Q filed last night.

Oral argument — Klein v. City of San Clemente

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2008

And I don't recall it with sufficient detail to comment on it. All right. Okay? Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. … Again, where you're leaving a sign up for long periods of time. I'm not quite sure what the issue is.

Oral argument — Raymond Nakano v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2014

The first is the Air Transport Safety and Stabilization Act of 2001, which Congress enacted immediately following the September 11th terrorist attacks, and then also the fact that National Airlines, the … They are not to be used for any other purpose, period. This is abundantly clear.

Oral argument — Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Kessler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2026

And there's no comment in the reply brief saying she wasn't served or wasn't aware of it. But on top of that, it's been sort of the whole issue the whole time. … Air Doctor has nothing to do with diversity. There's no state court. It's the Latham Act, a federal court. There's no discussion of diversity, no discussion of California law.

Oral argument — U.S. Dept. of Labor v. Grayson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2004

Before I address any of the comments made, I want to make a couple of observations. … What they said was there were some errors that would be cleaned up later. That's all the record really shows.

Oral argument — Martin v. Hubbard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2006

We look at something like 300 cases in a six-month period of time that cited In re Clark or In re Robbins out of almost 3,000 cases. … So, which I submit was a reiteration, a cleaned-up version of what had been previously submitted. Counsel says that it hadn't been previously raised, and we disagree on that.

Oral argument — Reinbold v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2026

And your contention, you've explained this in the briefing, is that there were supposed to be, well, there's a period where there were exemptions, and then you have alleged there's a period where that … Access Act.

Oral argument — 04-10619 United States v. S Whiteaker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2007

I've never seen a judge make that kind of a comment during an open court at a hearing questioning a law enforcement officer's integrity. He certainly would be quite frank with you. … There is certainly an evidence code section which states that if a person acts a certain way and has a habit or custom, that that can be introduced to show that on this occasion he acted in conformity

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Preston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

wife's comment or ex-wife's comment that he was a child molester. … The testimony was the comment was made in anger.

Oral argument — United States v. Louis Zacherle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2020

We're here today because the district court aired when it imposed $15,000 in restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, because the record lacks a sufficient, reliable causal link between … It can only be for a single act. And so that would be multiplicitous for it to be multiple offenses during that three-year period. And Mr.

Oral argument — Jane Doe v. John Kelly

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2017

They can't clean themselves properly. That presents an intolerable risk to the detainee population. Again, the spread of diseases. It's also just it's not humane. … Well, actually, I don't think that time period is overstated because of record-keeping issues.

Oral argument — Palomar Medical Center v. Kathleen Sebelius

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2012

And so why wouldn't the Congressional Act trump the Secretary's regulations? … Clean Water Act inspectors that would go to all the plants and, you know, it's totally inadequate. I mean, do we have a situation like this here?

Oral argument — Chiang v. FBI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2008

In this case, they suspended Agent Chang for a period of about eight months and then brought her back. With pay? With pay. Okay. That's probably the real defense in this case, not national security. … But granted that they use it, they cleaned it up with the Picard memo, which said we're not going to punish her for – or anyone in the FBI for failing a polygraph. That's in the record.