Documents

Oral argument — North East Medical Serv. Inc. v. CA Dept. of Health Care Serv.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2017

Either one is more than adequate front clean hands, and I'm sorry, I think it's fraud too. … This is a settlement under the False Claims Act.

Oral argument — Blaskovic v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2004

But according to his testimony, which wasn't said to be incredible, that the Air Force said he would be assassinated if war broke out, you know, because his father had been a — I guess because his father … Now, on exhaustion, the I.J. directed comments to the petitioners saying, if you had been present here for the required time, you might be eligible for the other relief, right? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Adobe Systems v. Joshua Christenson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2015

And would all that get us to the point that it's just a toss-up in the air at this point and then there's a factual issue? … And if you read Foreman, what Foreman said – and of course, this is under the 1909 Act, which is a different standard anyway.

Oral argument — NLRB v. United Food and Comm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2008

I mean, for each accounting period, provide Hilton and NOSIC with information. … The union also could examine its fringe benefit reports for the period in question and ask the people that worked in the unit during the relevant time period whether they got the welcoming letter.

Oral argument — First and Beck v. Bank of Southwest

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007

I didn't understand after the apostrophe in the court's comment. … I mean, you just don't pull it out of the air.

Oral argument — Anderson v. Warner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2005

Anderson made some comment about Rodney King and then when more people converged on him, Mr. Warner got behind him and put him in a chokehold and told him that just to be quiet and not say anything. … I'm trying to make it clean in this respect. So I'm not asking you to agree to this set of facts. Someone impersonates a police officer, dresses up in the uniform of a police officer.

Oral argument — United States v. Stuart Easchief

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2010

The defense is simply that it was not an intentional act? No, your honor. We do not know. And in fact, that was not. That's why I asked the broad question. … So the judge never got a chance to clean this up. The judge could have instructed the jury to disregard all of that, could even admonish, but the judge never had that.

Oral argument — Orlando Lopez v. William Muniz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

And I think that the fact that sticks out in my mind is that he was caught at, I think, an auto parts store inhaling, you know, a dust off canister, a canister of clean dust off of hubcaps and interiors … As a longtime user of meth, he would have been more inclined, more prone to use violence, to act arbitrarily, to act aggressively.

Oral argument — Huntington National Bank v. Desert Valley Financial LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2012

files in order to rebut the theory that PBCC tendered my point is PBCC never tendered that theory at trial it the only argument it ever made at trial respecting actual knowledge and the due diligence period … just tell me why why is his reading of those comments wrong because his reading carefully avoids what the comments talk about the comments say mere knowledge that there is some blanket security interest

Oral argument — Noe Silva v. San Pablo Police Department

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2020

We acted lawfully. We acted constitutionally. We did nothing wrong. So... As a formal matter, were the officers represented by an attorney when they were being deposed? … That would be stronger evidence of policy, but if Rosales says, and I'm paraphrasing so it's not quite so clean as this, but if Rosales says, I read what happened, I know everything about what happened

Oral argument — United States v. James Juan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2018

Well, first of all, I don't think anybody in this room wants to have one of these kinds of sex of value assessments, no matter how clean their life has been. It's a very personal. … And the treatment that he didn't complete dates back to the earlier period when he was convicted in the federal court on juvenile violation for the sex offense and because it didn't complete the treatment

Oral argument — POMONA VALLEY v. AGARWAL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2006

One is termination with just some notice, period. The second was termination for cause. … The last point I guess I should comment on was, is the issue that's been raised with regard to public policy.

Oral argument — Gina Celaya v. Charles Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2012

But let's assume it's raised like it was here, but the state court just doesn't comment on that point. … Well, I'm sorry to interrupt, but it seems if the court itself can act, then it's not exhausted for State purposes.

Oral argument — Bd of Trustees Glazing Health v. Shannon Chambers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2018

You're kind of, you know, the sky is falling chicken little here, but how many really are there in that period of time? How many? Yeah. … Well, it seems like it's Nevada pretty much acting simultaneously. This, I mean, the new law is responsive to exactly the problems that you were facing.

Oral argument — US ex rel. Mark McGrath v. Microsemi Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2017

are affected here are extremely sensitive government, for example, GPS guidance for missiles, electronics that allow an individual who's behind enemy lines to be located by the United States Army, the Air … as opposed to the fact that was potentially accessible for the period of time.

Oral argument — Marvin Roberts v. City of Fairbanks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2019

Is it significant that the state superior court judge basically made a comment that all he was doing was engaging in a ministerial act when he vacated? … What you're saying is you're going to, is suggesting is you could presume that the court acted outside its authority based on one comment made on the record.

Oral argument — HYDRANAUTICS v. FILMTEC CORP.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007

Fraud by intentional misrepresentation and also fraud by act of concealment. And California law recognizes both as well as Federal law. … We will stand in recess for an undetermined period of time.

Oral argument — People of the State v. USDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2008

Again, and the only issue is did the agency act reasonably in 2005 in looking back at essentially what was the status quo for the most part for those periods of time in determining, look, the National … My name is Kristen Boyles, and I want to address the Endangered Species Act issues and the Remedy Act issues here.

Oral argument — 3-55412 Jenkins v. Cnty of Riverside

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2004

She was initially brought in, she thought, to clean up some backlog, and this was all presented to the court. … That she was terminated in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act for disability or perceived disability. That was a pendant claim to this action.

Oral argument — U.S. Dept. of Labor v. Grayson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2004

Before I address any of the comments made, I want to make a couple of observations. … What they said was there were some errors that would be cleaned up later. That's all the record really shows.