Documents

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Blair

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2019

And Mary raised that in a post-judgment motion, but the circuit court issued a four-sentence post-judgment motion that did not comment on that at all. … It was the same amount every month for a certain period of time.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Groshans

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2014

But I think the Marriage and Dissolution Act would disagree with you. … Cannibal mothers, you know, like, you know, cause cannibal children or, you know, all these sort of crazy comments that were made by Andrew during the course of this case.

Oral argument — Brummel v. Grossman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 24, 2018

, the whistleblower act, start date, were not defenses that were raised in the underlying case. … And they gave him two or three opportunities to obtain current medical, but he wasn't even seeing a doctor during that period of time.

Oral argument — Mathews v. Alling

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

So isn't that where he just had this change of heart in that 20-hour period or 15-hour period? Because on the 20th of May, he says, I want my property to go to my children. Interesting. … Back in the day, I used to do a lot of weddings, and there was always a one-day waiting period. Was there a waiver? I don't know.

Oral argument — Estate of Kittel

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2015

The money was not used for any other purposes in that time period. … I objected to that at trial under the Hearsay Rule and the Dead Man's Act. It was the same.

Oral argument — Cunningham Township v. Hamer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2019

This is 2019, AIL Act, verse 180439. Have you provided that to opposing counsel? Have you provided that case to opposing counsel? No, I did not. I said I can supplement my brief. … I wanted to preserve the issue of constitutionality when we're in a period of decisions changing other decisions or whatever it is we can say they did.

Oral argument — Stevens v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2018

Messore keeps talking about, well, the respondent here could have had an examination within the end of that two-year period. What about that? … I mean, if that's the way they want to write the Occupational Disease Act, that every coal miner is presumed to have pneumoconiosis after... It has to be rebutted. It would have to be rebutted.

Oral argument — People v. Thompson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2010

And if there are no further questions, I respectfully request that the court – That was after the speedy trial period had passed, was it not? That was after the speedy trial period had passed. … that I made, that if this Court were to read the October 10th and October 30th letters as somehow doing more than complaining about counsel's trial strategy instead of, as is required to repudiate the act

Oral argument — Topflight Grain Cooperative, Inc. v. RJW Williams Farm, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2016

Under the UCC, we are required to give confirmation of the contract within a reasonable period of time. We did so. … Williams acted on the first contract and never delivered on the second.

Oral argument — Landreth Lumber Company v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2013

accident notice under 6B of the Act? … It sounds like from the comments by my opposing counsel that the court is well aware of the facts surrounding the issues in this case.

Oral argument — In the Matter of the Application of the County Treasurer Lincoln Title Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2013

And by final redemption period, what I'm talking about is the statute fixes the original redemption period, 21-350. … Intercounty National Title, 301 Ill Act 3rd, 672.

Oral argument — Lawson v. Iaderosa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2019

The Florida pleadings are this three or four-day period in January. At that point, he was waiting for money to arrive. He wasn't paying money in. We don't know. … Justice Posner, in the Sonnenberg case, commented at length upon how this statute stemmed from an era of moral repugnancy to gambling, which is simply not the case anymore.

Oral argument — People v. Herman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2011

Doesn't the Rape Shield Act preclude that? The Rape Shield Act does not include it – preclude it for – for two reasons. But the main one here is motive. … Well, those are the acts. Those are the acts. That constitute a crime? Those are the – that constitute the misconduct.

Oral argument — Soto v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2013

their probationary period. … And that background information is fairly substantial based on comments made by previous employers.

Oral argument — People v. Crowder

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2016

That was a longer time period. That was a longer time period. … And he has personal knowledge that the statement was made, that that verbal act was made. It was a verbal act. It was a statement made. It's coming in for the statement made.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Staker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2016

At the time of trial, we agreed that the value of that farm was $1,045,000, a 1,300% increase over that 25-year period. … A few comments, Your Honors, regarding Mr. Wing's presentation. Rhoda did not leave this marriage with a small amount of money.

Oral argument — Vernetti v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2017

And counsel had commented that there wasn't a long history, but even their own expert made that comment. So on page 226 of the record, Dr. Hartman had pulled out a quote from Dr. … But in all honesty, I could not think of what that argument would be that could be established under the workers' compensation act.

Oral argument — Neubauer v. Piercy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2025

That the estoppel needs to occur all through the limitations period. … Is there ever then a period of limitations or no?

Oral argument — 1-20-0574

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2021

And then it goes, we conclude that CPSC had not improperly withheld the accident reports from the requesters under the Freedom of Information Act. … And that should go to the comments— Your argument isn't that the court had no jurisdiction at all.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Onishi-Chong

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

Really the question is when somebody acts fraudulent in discovery, who bears the impact of it? Is it the litigant who committed the fraud, or is it the innocent party? … A couple of comments with regard to that.