Documents

Oral argument — People v. Hoskins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2016

That is that the defendant picked up AF by the neck and held him up for a period of time. … But anyway, I mean, there is evidence that he couldn't breathe for a short period of time. Well, the act itself, I would say.

Oral argument — Dehne v. City of Reno

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2003

The two provisions are such that the public comment period is simply reserved for making comments, things you want to address and say that they didn't get the snow off the streets here the day before yesterday … You can make any comment, a public comment at the beginning, the public comment period on any subject, but you cannot make comment during that period on matters on the agenda item.

Oral argument — MORRIS v. GIURBINO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2005

This is one of our cases that said, we've held that the right attaches to the period during which the accused is within sight of a potential identification witness. … The motion to dismiss where all this was aired was filed after, you know, a few days after on January three of 2000.

Oral argument — United States v. George Curtis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2014

This court and other courts have said other acts, evidence such as other tax violations, is admissible. … He claims it was for intent, but all it was to do was to say, this guy isn't so clean. I can tell you he's not so clean because just a couple of months ago he didn't pay his payroll taxes.

Oral argument — Celerity v. Ultra Clean

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2008

The first being, obviously, the Declaratory Judgment Act. … Now, within that 20-day period, they filed the suit and never served us during that period, nor did they notify us of the suit.

Oral argument — Daniel Mann v. Quiktrip Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2025

You're on a clean slate at that point. Pardon? You're on a clean slate at that point. Yes. … So the clean slate example is, if there's a clean slate, then even if I'm negligent, let's say I go and I throw a couple pieces of salt down.

Oral argument — John Sturgeon v. Sue Masica

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2016

So issues of dumping fuel in the water, that's still illegal under the Clean Water Act. … They retain authority under the Commerce Clause to regulate these waters. 103C takes that into account by referencing generally applicable regulations like Clean Water Act, Army Corps of Engineers, that

Oral argument — People v. Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2011

This defendant argues that this, quote-unquote, these repeated acts of prosecutorial misconduct rise to the level of plain air, not under the first prompt, but specifically under the second prompt. … The point of the people's argument is simply that the defendant cannot meet plain error, period.

Oral argument — Phoenix Cement Co v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2015

It was adopted pursuant to notice and comment. But not as applicable to this plant? Your Honor, I believe it's at least persuasive, and I believe — That's right. Okay. … But there's certainly nothing in the regulations, nothing in the statute that requires a particular averaging period.

Oral argument — Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2016

It's simply a choice that is posed by the Clean Water Act. … The Clean Water Act itself doesn't say anything about this particular property. And the Clean Water Act doesn't cover all waters.

Oral argument — Fore River Residents Against the Comp.Station v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2023

Was former chairman issuing the devastating comment. That my clients read, which stated. … And a petitioner must challenge the aggrieving order under section 717 are of the natural gas act.

Oral argument — Valerie Withrow v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2015

Can I say that it is clear air when the plan says only time when a period of less than 24 months could be utilized was when the employee was seeking benefits, had been employed less than 24 months? … So I have a clear air determination. And then I have to say, well, what's the 24 months?

Oral argument — City of Mattoon v. Quakenbush

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2026

He's cleaned up after their fires. He's cleaned up after the tornadoes. He's cleaned up after a lot of things. He has a working relationship with the city. … And one of the orders that the courts gave to us was to submit a plan to clean this property. And so we obeyed that court order and submitted a plan to clean the property.

Oral argument — Brennan v. City of Philadelphia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2021

Atkinson, who had made pretty egregious comments, racial comments, to not only him, but other city officials repeatedly over a period of time, wasn't asked, and in fact, nothing was done. … All right, but it's not as clean as the city saying, look, we're letting you go because you're oppositional or you're obstinate, right? It wasn't that clean, right? What about Mr.

Oral argument — Occidental Petroleum v. Wells Fargo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

They would have a right at the end of all benefits running clean. They would. If the benefits were exhausted, the residual would go back to Occidental or to Anadarko at the end. … As this court emphasized in its en banc decision in Little against Liquid Air Corporation, summary judgment is not a disfavored procedural shortcut.

Oral argument — Jamaal Cameron v. Michael Bouchard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2020

And the second the issue here with the overcrowding act the governor's executive order in Michigan has temporarily suspended all procedures in the jail overcrowding act and part of the jail overcrowding … Because numerous inmates testified that shared spaces were not being cleaned. Mr.

Oral argument — Charles Owens v. 3M Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2018

Clean, safe water at no cost to the class. … Number one, Judge Wilson, you said they got clean water out of this. They had clean water before the settlement was entered into it.

Oral argument — United States v. Montemayor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2022

So we are on plain air. … In count two of the firearm conspiracy, there is no doubt that this was not a clean charge, not a clean instruction. I assume the pattern jury instructions discriminate between those two, right?

Oral argument — Dutra Group v. Batterton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2019

Waxman, right, that the remedy for unseaworthiness was for a period of time only the ability to collect wages? The yes. And when did that change? It started to change in the 1800s. … And I would offer you that in Exxon, this Court considered a question closely analogous to the one here, which is whether or not the penalties under the Clean Water Act for pollution displaced the general

Oral argument — People ex rel. Madigan v. Burge

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2014

Number one, the Administrative Review Act provides for a 35-day period in which to file an objection. It's jurisdictional. … I think it has no statutory time period because it was meant to address acts which are void, taken beyond the scope of the board's authority, and so that they can be questioned at any time in any courtroom