Documents

Oral argument — FIRST, BECK v. BANK OF SOUTHWEST

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007

I didn't understand after the apostrophe in the Court's comment. … I mean, you just don't pull it out of the air.

Oral argument — Bank of New York Mellon v. SFR Investment Pool, 1, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2024

She essentially consolidated the cases and then allowed Bank of New York Mellon to essentially wipe the slate clean of the 2019 complaint, supplant it with the 2018 complaint, and then that rendered the … There were a couple of trial payments in the 2011 time period, but I don't recall precisely whether those payments were actually made or if there was just a negotiation among the parties.

Oral argument — Neil Goldberg v. James Cameron

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2017

Then after my client inquired about it, they put it back in, and that was the last act in the conspiracy which re-triggered all the state statutes. … I can't comment on that. All I know is that for purposes of analyzing removal, we have to look at what was served on the parties. It is clear from the federal removal statutes itself.

Oral argument — Orantes-Barrera v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2012

It's like we're resetting the clock, wiping the slate clean. That testimony never happened. He was giving her an additional chance to sort of rehabilitate her testimony, I believe. … And also, I think, I mean, you could comment to this, but as I was reading it, the IJ made a finding.

Oral argument — Daniel Forrand v. Federal Express Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010

They involve aircraft mechanics and vehicle mechanics, administrative positions, operations positions, in divisions as different as ground operations, air operations, legal and finance, not all of whom … With respect to the comment that there are many different job categories and that they are set forth in the record and all that is true, again, with respect to the begin shift, end shift time, that is

Oral argument — In re: RS AIR, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2022

And so I guess to address your question, your comment first, we are not here arguing that this debtor does not qualify to file for bankruptcy. … Rather, it was periodically reimbursed for affiliate third party flights, either a break even or for a profit. And Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Kenneth Olsen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2012

It was a unique time period It was right it occurred actually right before 9-11 So the United States did have the requirement to prove that he possessed it with the intent to use it as a weapon and I want … They were sent to clean out the defendants cubicle They found these items. They touched them with bare hands. They picked them up.

Oral argument — Atanda v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

But in this case, and as the court noted in Perez-Mejia in its new footnote, oftentimes there's not clean pleadings and evidentiary stage, but it's all mixed together. … Could you just comment on that, please? Yes, Your Honor. Whether he understood – it seems clear that he understood the question. This is an educated man. He was a comptroller for a hospital.

Oral argument — US ex rel. Mark McGrath v. Microsemi Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2017

are affected here are extremely sensitive government, for example, GPS guidance for missiles, electronics that allow an individual who's behind enemy lines to be located by the United States Army, the Air … as opposed to the fact that was potentially accessible for the period of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Eligio Munoz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2022

That allowed a grace period, and that grace period expired on January 1, 2019. … The defendant's possession of the item in his car with two other firearms that he was in possession of, and the finding by the district court that that is ownership is not clear air.

Oral argument — Andres Dominguez v. City of Scottsdale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023

The officer was in the act... It's a fluent act of the officer getting him out of the vehicle and onto the ground so they can get him in handcuffs. At no point did Mr. … He ignored every single comment or every single command by the officer. The officer had absolutely every right to order him out of the car and for him to be out of the car.

Oral argument — I.R. v. LAUSD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2015

It means it shall somehow out of the air take place? No, Your Honor. It's a requirement imposed on the parents? No, Your Honor. … And in this case, it was about a two-year period of time. Correct, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Gordon Wood v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2023

It's not like the air conditioner was broken and you're trying to drive between Vegas and Phoenix. … The whole thrust of the Warranty Act is that if repairs, once completed, are not completed satisfactorily.

Oral argument — Peterson Brothers v. Lexington Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2007

And the reason being is that that is not a protected act. The employee did not have, had not tested positive for drugs, was not in a rehab program. … Ciaz's use of drugs, illegal drugs, which is an intentional act.

Oral argument — United States v. Joshua Elkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2012

here in support of his motion to dismiss reflect an exact, basically the same frequency of reporting, 90 days, lifetime duration, which again under SORNA could be knocked down to 25 years if he has a clean … Elkins was traveling, perhaps for an extended period of time, but traveling nonetheless, perhaps not moving.

Oral argument — XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2010

In that case, we would reserve the remaining period of time and allow Excel to argue the coverage issues as that is their appellate issue. All right. Very well. Thank you very much. Counsel? … Well, that's up in the air. I don't know exactly. The helicopter's on the ground. To be refueled.

Oral argument — United States v. Ralph Redd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2013

Yes, that in this particular I mean, the evidence was overwhelming that he had an opportunity to observe her for a substantial period of time. Depending on They lived together. … But is that significant at all, in other words, the fact that it was in evidence, as opposed to a prosecutor just sort of picking an argument out of the air somewhere? No, I don't think so.

Oral argument — POMONA VALLEY v. AGARWAL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2006

One is termination with just some notice, period. The second was termination for cause. … The last point I guess I should comment on was, is the issue that's been raised with regard to public policy.

Oral argument — Gina Celaya v. Charles Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2012

But let's assume it's raised like it was here, but the state court just doesn't comment on that point. … Well, I'm sorry to interrupt, but it seems if the court itself can act, then it's not exhausted for State purposes.

Oral argument — United States v. F. Whittemore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2014

There is some discussion about this at sentencing, because Judge Hicks at sentencing was commenting there were a lot of supporters of the defendant at the sentencing hearing, and Judge Hicks explained … The defendant was in a business dispute with some former business partners, and they cleaned out his office, and they, in cleaning out his office and transferring it, they came across the file with all