Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Palmer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

Palmer in his car acting perfectly appropriate. It's daytime. It's a heavily traveled thoroughfare. It's a residential neighborhood. He sits in his car. … And if I could just finish up with this one comment. You look at the eight findings that Judge Dumar made. Let's talk about them briefly.

Oral argument — Pedro Jimenez-Cedillo v. Jefferson Sessions III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2018

It acted instead as though it was writing on a clean slate. But in truth, the slate was far from clean. … A finding of moral turpitude under the act requires that a perpetrator have committed the reprehensible act with some form of scienter.

Oral argument — Ronald P. Young v. CHS Middle East, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2015

They also require a certification exam and 60 hours of medical certification training over a four year period of time. … These are periodic reports that are sent to the State Department to confirm- I just want to make sure I understand.

Oral argument — Fay Cole v. Family Dollar Stores of MD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019

Thompson, and again, counsel is actually glossing over the applicable time period. It's Judge Rushing, you were speaking about comparators. The applicable time period is when Ms. … Cole testified about the comments.

Oral argument — South Carolina Coastal v. United States Army Corps

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2015

There's no requirement here in the Clean Water Act that South Coast do that. There's no requirement under the APA that the Corps require them to do that and the Corps couldn't. … This part of the Clean Water Act that we're talking about, Section 404, began its life, legally, in terms of its enforcement with efforts by the Corps of Engineers, I know because I was there, I was a

Oral argument — United States v. Richard Savage

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2013

I agree that the issue here is clean. There's two D.C. statutes that apply. It's clean unless we mess it up. How do you respond to Mr. … in place and that were passed over a period of years.

Oral argument — United States v. Richard Rund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2025

We presume that they're acting constitutionally. … It was this Corollary Crim Forfeiture 18 U.S.C. 982, and so the court made that comment that that forfeiture act, the section 982, is targeted at drug traffickers and criminals and blah, blah, blah, and

Oral argument — Shelly Stevens v. Dawn Holler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023

They cleaned him up. They got him ready for his bail hearing, which he couldn't even go to for another 24 hours. And they got him out the door. … He was only there for a short period of time, but he was being actively treated for that entire time.

Oral argument — United States v. Charles Walker, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2022

The testimony that he was acting afraid came during the direct of the other employee. … So I understand that at least some of this may be under plein air. I would argue that not all of it should be viewed as plein air. There were, in fact, objections.

Oral argument — Peter Maldini v. Accenture LLP

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023

It's a clean legal issue. And the whole point of 23 Act is to get the thing that I thought was a clean legal issue. … And the class period is from 2014 to 2018. But I thought you would argue that would be a reason for him to do it in this – The way he did it, Judge Graham.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Juarez-Santamaria

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2013

you sell these drugs and the defendant says no I didn't and then later the defendant asked for a new plea hearing and in his letter to the court he explained I didn't sell the drugs myself but I did acts … and followed along because counsel indicates that he had a seventh grade education but what he told the court was that he had an education equal to ten years in the United States and that he also did air

Oral argument — Herbert E. Liverman v. City of Petersburg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2016

The air of the court was then to say, but they're protected by qualified immunity or municipal liability. … And there is language from NTEU that says where you act pursuant to a ban that chills speech before it occurs.

Oral argument — Otis Hill v. Southeastern Freight Lines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2013

Hill's performance, on February 25th, 2010, he had a record of negative comments about his performance. … Hill is clean, in terms of his write-ups, disciplinary action, and whatnot.

Oral argument — Tammy Skidmore v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021

The whole impetus for the act was that rail transportation was getting squeezed and disadvantaged by newer modes of transportation or by highways, by trucking, by air, by shipping. … Your Honor, I would just suggest that that should have been a comment on the plaintiff, not on the district court.

Oral argument — Beckley Oncology Associates v. Rami Abumasmah

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2020

Massachusetts law provided for a longer time limitations period. The arbitrator didn't look to Massachusetts law. … Well, with all due respect, Your Honor, I don't believe arbitrator Snyder necessarily pulled this remedy out of thin air.

Oral argument — United States v. Jervis Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2013

Her response about restitution was specifically tied to the court's comment during the sentencing that because there's no identifiable victim, restitution is waived. … Period. Can't all this be avoided by being specific? That would have been very nice had that happened. In fact, there was no agreement for that. There was no agreement.

Oral argument — David Annor v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2024

IJ's must apply the law of the circuit that corresponds to the location of the immigration court where venue lay under the regulations now we would agree with the government if this court was writing a clean … 1956 a1b that's on pages 379 and 80 of the joint appendix though transactional money laundering under section 1957 a wasn't even alleged as an object of the conspiracy so what so the board indisputably aired

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Robinson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2013

But it doesn't wipe the slate clean, does it? I mean, basically, there's a dispute that needs to be resolved. Right. … That's within that time period. That's, again, that's an absurd result, but that seems to be appropriate. But the note, U.S.

Oral argument — Kevin Buker v. Howard County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2016

I want to clean up a few things that Ms. Pelton. I read that the same way you just interpreted it. … To clean up a few things that Ms. Peltzman brought up, defendants, I suppose, are alleging on appeal that somehow Mr. Buecher wasn't ordered to take that first post down.

Oral argument — United States v. James McDonald

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2023

What time period are we talking here that all of these actions happened? How quickly, Your Honor? Yes. He opens the door at second 19, and then by second 24, he's releasing his gun. … I appreciate the comments here. I've highlighted a portion of the point of appendix. I wasn't going to go into this because of Officer Greyhouse's credibility. He's not credible by the court.