Documents

Oral argument — Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

That act did not mandate demolition of the Lemon Avenue Terminal, nor did it bar plaintiffs from using that terminal for air and transportation purposes. … Well, they couldn't because of the Antitrust Act, because of federal preemption of air transportation in this country.

Oral argument — Katsouros v. OAC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2015

But your view would be that that too is sort of wiped clean by the January 9th letter from Dr. Pope? That's exactly right, Your Honor. … His argument is that the agency knew all along that he is impaired under the act with a disease that is continuing to impair, and so he's saying to himself, even though I was not there, you're trying to

Oral argument — WILDER v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2012

that prior period of civilian service to satisfy this requirement for a subsequent period as a contract negotiator for the Department of Health and Human Services. … You know, we have to give deference to that since it's an agency regulation enacted with notice and comment and all of that.

Oral argument — Monk v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2019

And the fact that legislative action may occur in the future is not a reason to not act. … And the injunction that the class members seek is that the VA adjudicate these appeals within a certain period of time. That period of time is a question for the merits.

Oral argument — Young v. Lumenis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2007

Cleaned up a bit. It's been cleaned up. The reality of this here is this part here is the claw, which is not at issue. The part that we're talking about is this tiny part here. … That is not really ever cited in the papers except in passing in the reply when they commented on our brief.

Oral argument — CAMILO v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2011

Those submissions were considered first by the Air Force Personnel Center in their advisory opinion. … Then she had a chance to respond to the Air Force Personnel Center in that advisory opinion before the board.

Oral argument — Delaney v. Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2009

He was a fellow air traffic controller. Mr. … It took two months to act on her request for leave without pay. And the administrative law judge said, well, there you go. It took two months.

Oral argument — Paluck v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2015

I would be happy to, and also to address some of the comments that Mr. Nemeroff made. … Do you have any comment on that?

Oral argument — Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc. v. Atlanta Gas Light Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2018

And along the way, he dismissed it and then later attempted to file after the six-month period had run. … The board used hindsight analysis to pick a reference, just pulled it out of the air.

Oral argument — DEAN v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2011

And there's nothing conversely in the record to establish that the period—that any period of disability within the meaning of Section 2501 has somehow been lifted. … Dean cites in his brief involve review under the Administrative Procedures Act, which, of course, doesn't proceed upon the basis of Tucker Act jurisdiction.

Oral argument — Tesco Corporation v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2015

They never came clean with the court. They continued to take the position the invention wasn't in there. … The arguments about all of the other supposed bad acts that my clients did, they're wrong. There are answers to it. That's why the court didn't touch them. The court didn't mention it.

Oral argument — Gersten v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2026

Gerson committed those acts, that is something that can be reviewed for substantial evidence. … The physical acts, whatever it might be. Yes, Your Honor. You're saying we can review that for substantial evidence.

Oral argument — Honeywell Intl v. Hamilton Sundstran

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2007

If they're open, obviously we've got a lot of air coming in, and it's a high-pressure situation. In hindsight, that makes some sense, Your Honor. … They have something that controls the flow of air in and through the compressor, and that affects the flow, that affects the temperature.

Oral argument — +SEB v. Montgomery Ward

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2009

If you don't know about it, you can't be inducing infringement for that period of time. … And one who was acting in an objectively business-like manner should have known that the product is probably patented. Pentelpha had made other products, not this product.

Oral argument — Air Turbine v. Atlas Copco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2009

Such as attorney's fees under the Patent Act. We had a patent claim that was tried, attorney's fees under the Lanham Act. There was a Lanham Act case or claim that went out on summary judgment. … And one of the doctrines that we use from time to time in determining the intent of the parties is how they conduct themselves during the period of the contract.

Oral argument — Ad Hoc Shrimp v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2010

This record here below from a clean slate, however, it has stated, I think, numerous times that it usually begins its de novo review with the informed opinion of the CIT. … That still is, in the world of judicial review of agency action, that is not considered an impermissible agency act, typically. No, I agree, Your Honor. Agencies certainly can change their policies.

Oral argument — SightSound Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2015

Why isn't resting the patentability decision on a ground that wasn't raised at all, an ultravirus act? … We don't — respectfully, we don't agree with the wash-clean doctrine. I was just saying that that can't apply here.

Oral argument — Blees v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2006

That's the same thing as my son saying to me, Your Honor, I'm going to clean up my room, and then I know he also says, but I'm going out to play now. … Well, but if you say you're going to clean up the room, sometime this week, then if he goes out and plays today, he's not out of compliance.

Oral argument — Airgo IP v. Arvinmeritor

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2008

The argument from claim differentiation is that the inventor acted precisely and the invented actor purposefully. … And during those periods under claim 15 and under the general specification there are instances of misalignment where the seal doesn't work perfectly.

Oral argument — In Re Basell Poliolefine

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2008

But the overlapping period, there was solid prosecution in both applications. … In addition, the comments on the 496 anticipating claims, the 496 didn't even exist.