Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Vera Kuzmenko

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2019

There is something disquieting about the notion that if you make a false statement to a person who is also acting fraudulently and they don't care about it because they have their own motives for fraud … As far as I was understanding the description, it was the amount of the loan minus what the House sold for, period. Did you figure that much out? We could figure that much out. All right.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Chavez-Pacheco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014

And as the federal courts have analyzed that in both Leocal and Fernandez-Ruiz, it requires a purposeful act, some act that is intended to accomplish a particular outcome. … Then the person who committed the crime in the intervening period gets deported.

Oral argument — United States v. Francisco Gasca-Ruiz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2016

I look at what the comment is. And the comment defines what it is. And then it's just a matter of whether, in fact, the injury meets the comment and the law. … The comment doesn't talk about how long. The comment only talks about if the injury is both painful and obvious, it's significant.

Oral argument — Sharon Hapner v. Tom Tidwell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 18, 2009

We're talking about a six-week period between now and the first week of February. Right. I understand that. Okay. … That's what the public commented on. And that's what the district court decided its initial decision on was whether or not the Forest Service had met this 67%.

Oral argument — Roberto Maldonado v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2014

Why isn't the correct analysis, the last known act and the last official act we have, is that he has been taken out of the jurisdiction of the United States? He's been removed. … I was going to say, in cleaning up our case, you didn't mention anything about Limas-Galvan in cleaning up our case law. Well, with respect to the jurisdictional issue. No, no, no. The impossibility.

Oral argument — Edward Rezek v. City of Tustin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016

Under 148A, a police officer has to be acting within the legal scope of his or her duties in order for there to be a 148A resisting arrest cause of action. … Invalid because an officer can, because they would not have been acting within the lawful scope of their duties. You're just talking about the resisting arrest.

Oral argument — Blaskovic v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2004

But according to his testimony, which wasn't said to be incredible, that the Air Force said he would be assassinated if war broke out, you know, because his father had been a — I guess because his father … Now, on exhaustion, the I.J. directed comments to the petitioners saying, if you had been present here for the required time, you might be eligible for the other relief, right? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Brothers/Barker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2007

And it covered a period of time from roughly December of 2002, January of 2003, up until the date of that indictment in May of 2003. … And the testimony was undisputed that Pitch received illegal drugs from Bryan over that entire period of time.

Oral argument — Barraza de Henriquez v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

So there was really no detail about kind of the interim period there, and she was never asked. So there was really no inconsistency. … Does it mean that he saw any pretended or he acted as if nothing was happening because, well, he acted as if nothing was happening because he didn't realize anything was happening?

Oral argument — Pickens v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2007

This is not like Aloha Air, where a witness is making assertions about things where she doesn't possibly have the personal knowledge about them. … Pickens must establish that she's disabled under the Rehabilitation Act. And it's not enough for her to show that she has a medical condition or an impairment.

Oral argument — Bona Fide Conglomerate, Inc. v. SourceAmerica

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2017

Everything from a Coast Guard facility to a courthouse, to an air, to an Air Force facility. We can look at each one. … Your Honor, under the, taking the allegations of the complaint is true, paragraph 76, at no time over the 10-year period where the wrongdoing is alleged, were there more than four board members from the

Oral argument — La Loma Grande, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2018

It was one of eight attorneys that made that comment, Your Honor. The others pursued it in full, robustly, much to the – It wasn't tried. Well, the DEC action was tried. … Now, the appellate looks now to the Equal Access to Justice Act to extend and get past the Federal Tort Claims Act limits.

Oral argument — United States v. Adam Horty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2022

In acting on this information, law enforcement obtained a search warrant for a residence that they believed was used by Mr. Horty. … hearing that didn't happen here so mr horty shows up and he's on his heels oh this two-level enhancement is at play here this is a very important issue uh the other issue goes back to judge pergerson's comments

Oral argument — United States v. Ambrosio Constantino, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2018

And so the judge does have more of a role in a deferred sentencing, because a plea takes place, and then the person is — is deferred for sentencing for a long period of time. … But basically, I understand and say it makes sense to wipe clean the slate here and go back and start from the beginning and see what's in the best interest for both parties, you know, Mr.

Oral argument — Umpqua Valley Audubon Society v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2005

comments to the petitioners whenever they commented. … In fact, that's what is done in other similar situations where, for example, a licensee or other party is challenging the conditions of a Clean Water Act certification under Section 401 in state court.

Oral argument — Leslie Feldman v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2016

Whereas when you're talking about a broader registration period, and frankly, a court in Wisconsin found that when you narrowed that registration period, that did itself... … But here you are talking about something that happens in a very short period of time. The distinction is, if it's a short period of time, it might violate section two.

Oral argument — Dejon White v. State of California

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2019

And so therefore, he's not acting in a vacuum. He's acting because the two officers brought this information to him. So therefore, they're the two officers who are discriminating. … But I direct you to Officer Pender's declaration because most of the hearsay statements were attributed to her having overheard comments made by Warren and Panisi.

Oral argument — PAMC, Ltd. v. Kathleen Sebelius

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2014

Well, there might be act of God. … So it's kind of a clean slate the following fiscal year. I think that's right, Your Honor. So unless the Court has any further questions.

Oral argument — Joseph Fangsrud Von Esch v. Asset Systems, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2020

I know there've been some cases I've been on where a panel, may have prepared an opinion and then enter an order that its mandate would not enter, would mandate, would not issue for a period of time to … My fear is that because of the district court's comments about sanctioning this counsel to the tune of over six figures, that defense may be emboldened in a mediation setting until we clear the record

Oral argument — FIRST, BECK v. BANK OF SOUTHWEST

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007

I didn't understand after the apostrophe in the Court's comment. … I mean, you just don't pull it out of the air.