Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.21s
Oral argument — Atchafalaya Basinkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018
To the contrary, the 408 EA expressly said that they would be insignificant and that mitigation would be discussed in the 404 EA, the Clean Water Act EA, solely because the Clean Water Act regs do require … So very much the Clean Water Act is designed to protect specific uses.
48 min of audioOral argument — City & County of San Francisco v. USEPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2022
And as a result of the vacater of one of those necessary authorizations, the permit would not be effective just for the purposes of the Clean Water Act. … And you're creating exactly the situation that Arkansas versus Oklahoma said the Clean Water Act did not do.
48 min of audioOral argument — Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2025
To help states meet their obligations to establish pollutant criteria levels under the Clean Water Act, Clean Water Act Section 304 directs EPA to publish non-binding recommendations for water quality … The first way is if a state proposes their own criteria, and EPA disapproves those as inconsistent with the Clean Water Act.
38 min of audioOral argument — Entergy Texas, Incorporated v. Donna Nelson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2018
And they didn't say subject to this is all going to be up in the air again when we get the final true-up. … For the entire period. For the entire period. And it made its order effective from the beginning of the compliance period, starting June 2007, even though the decision was made in 2015.
44 min of audioOral argument — Peoples National Bank, N.A. v. Darnell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2019
I'm just out of thin air. And really, the guarantee is no different. This record is silent that on May 18th, when this loan was made, that Mr. … It had been going on a period of time. Of five years, Your Honor, yes. And what interested me is the fact that Mr. Garnell testified that after three years he was supposed to be released.
45 min of audioOral argument — People v. Gomez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2019
Now, there was an error here, the state should not have been allowed to make a comment, but this court has found that that can be harmless. … But I'll just make the point that the defendant did turn down the chance to wipe the slate clean.
46 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Norwood
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2022
And from that point, I can move on with a clean slate. … That did not exist at the time of the Victim Witness Protection Act.
77 min of audioOral argument — Bankier Apartments v. Patel
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010
When I asked some of these witnesses, how much time did you spend, you know, if you thought it was dirty, how much time did you spend cleaning it? Did you hire anybody else to clean it? … The landlord cleaned the dishes and pots and pans, had their agent go in and clean the dishes, pots and pans, put them back up on the racks, had them clean the stove and remove the grease that was on top
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. James Lucero
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2020
But the owners of that land already knew exactly what the Clean Water Act required. … Based on those facts, the jury was properly able to find that his dumping scheme violated the Clean Water Act. I'll turn first to the argument that the Clean Water Act is unconstitutionally vague.
44 min of audioOral argument — Martin Jaranowski v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad C
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2023
I represent injured railroad employees, and this is a Federal Employers Liability Act case. Just a little history. You know, railroad employees don't get workers' comp, state workers' comp benefits. … but even if there were evidence that we knew about the missing cotter pin on October 15, it still would not be a violation of the regulation for at least another 30 days because we have a full 30-day period
25 min of audioOral argument — & 03-72894 - DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2004
One is, I think, again, you've got to come back to the Clean Water Act, which is, is there really a conflict between the Clean Water Act and Section 7? … The funding mechanism flows from 106 of the Clean Water Act, I believe.
60 min of audioOral argument — Secretary of Labor v. Walmart Stores East
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2018
So the enforcement policy still serves the purposes of the act where all these provisions are met. … OSHA took that under advisement, and as other courts have found, issuing under 6B does allow, if we follow notice and comment rulemaking and respond to comments as we did here, it was in response to comments
27 min of audioOral argument — Marco Cantu v. Michael Schmidt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2015
When it comes up, finish your sentence, put a period at the end if you need more time. … Your Honor, I appreciate exactly where the Court's coming from with that comment.
38 min of audioOral argument — Protect Our Parks, Inc. v. Pete Buttigieg
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2023
And is there any indication that if the plaintiffs had gotten their amended complaint and things, contrary to the stipulation, I'll comment, but suppose though they'd gotten their amended complaint, are … What happens is once the challenge is made under the Environmental Protections Act and under the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, whatever the Historical Preservation Act, the duty is the federal government
48 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Daniel Kiraz
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2017
Those are the overt acts alleged as overt act number four in Count 1. Mr. … That means that Daniel had to take the extra step of removing the six months of house and door that was recorded on the spreadsheet in order to give what I'll call a clean spreadsheet, a clean false spreadsheet
30 min of audioOral argument — John Doe, 1 v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2024
United States case, which has facts much more analogous to ours here, where we had children at a daycare center at an Air Force base who were molested by unknown assailants. … There were allegations of the daycare workers hitting the children, causing the children to hit each other, spraying the children in the face with cleaning solutions like Windex, things of that nature.
32 min of audioOral argument — Sanitary Brd of Charleston v. Andrew Wheeler
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2020
We plop it into the Clean Water Act. It couldn't be more clear. It has got to have the same meaning in the Clean Water Act. … Reinbold is one in a line of cases that involves the Privacy Act. The Privacy Act has the fee provision requirement that a claimant substantially prevail, period. That's the language.
39 min of audioOral argument — Twpof Tinicum v. Cityof Phila
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2011
What's the 84 Act have to do with this? We sent you all a letter and asked, please comment on this Aviation Zoning Act, Pennsylvania's enactment in 1984. … And the Federal Aviation Act, obviously, as everybody knows, is intended to preempt the area of air safety. But Vision 100 is strictly an economic and environmental act.
48 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ibrahim Yousef
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2009
They deliberated for over seven hours, which was a substantial period of time, and then returned the verdict. … And second, it issues a clean slate instruction, ordering the jurors to start the liberations over and disregard anything that happened.
23 min of audioOral argument — Office of the State Fire Marshal v. Illinois Pollution Control Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2022
And also they would continue to be regulated under the Environmental Protection Act, generally, for any water pollution, air pollution, or ground pollution they caused. … It does provide a way to ensure that there is money to provide to clean up messes.
44 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.