Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007

It's hard to act like they don't count for anything because it's the only reason your client was filing all these petitions, to get the benefit of the stays and to fend off creditors for periods of time … So how is it immaterial if it's the reason your client's acting the way he's acting? Well, the... And he's not fending off his creditors for sport.

Oral argument — Andres Dominguez v. City of Scottsdale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023

The officer was in the act... It's a fluent act of the officer getting him out of the vehicle and onto the ground so they can get him in handcuffs. At no point did Mr. … He ignored every single comment or every single command by the officer. The officer had absolutely every right to order him out of the car and for him to be out of the car.

Oral argument — Edward Rezek v. City of Tustin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016

Under 148A, a police officer has to be acting within the legal scope of his or her duties in order for there to be a 148A resisting arrest cause of action. … Invalid because an officer can, because they would not have been acting within the lawful scope of their duties. You're just talking about the resisting arrest.

Oral argument — Phil Thalheimer v. City of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2010

That is, we are seeking to retain the status quo that existed previous to the acts complained of, and the acts complained of is the adoption of these laws that restrict the First Amendment activity of … You see, that's my trouble with Randall because it's a typical, careful, balancing, multi-factor, nuanced opinion, which doesn't give us a clean rule for now.

Oral argument — Fishermen's Finest Inc v. Carlos Gutierrez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2009

Fisheries Act hauler fleet. … But that doesn't tell me you should use a time period when they do something different than they're allowed to do now.

Oral argument — PAMC, Ltd. v. Kathleen Sebelius

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2014

Well, there might be act of God. … So it's kind of a clean slate the following fiscal year. I think that's right, Your Honor. So unless the Court has any further questions.

Oral argument — Y.Y.G.M. SA v. Redbubble, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2023

First, the Supreme Court said it is the standard for willful blindness, period, and it's been applied in criminal cases, let alone other intellectual property cases. … make air conditioners.

Oral argument — United States v. Melchor-Zaragoza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003

Why isn't it harmless air, even if you're right? Well, I just submit to the Court it's not. … over a period of seven months and done at least for 200 victims.

Oral argument — Joseph Fangsrud Von Esch v. Asset Systems, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2020

I know there've been some cases I've been on where a panel, may have prepared an opinion and then enter an order that its mandate would not enter, would mandate, would not issue for a period of time to … My fear is that because of the district court's comments about sanctioning this counsel to the tune of over six figures, that defense may be emboldened in a mediation setting until we clear the record

Oral argument — The ACT Group, Inc. v. James Hamlin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2017

Served to be common, standard statements, comments, phrases used in this industry. Industry of training, salesman of air conditioning equipment. … The comment that we hear is the separation of these... of Mr. Hamlin from the anti-corruption group. Mr.

Oral argument — Seyed Takieh v. Banner Health

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

I'm trying to figure out whether those who acted against him knew he was Arab and acted on that basis. … First of all, I'd like to make a couple comments about some of the questions the judges have asked.

Oral argument — Barraza de Henriquez v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

So there was really no detail about kind of the interim period there, and she was never asked. So there was really no inconsistency. … Does it mean that he saw any pretended or he acted as if nothing was happening because, well, he acted as if nothing was happening because he didn't realize anything was happening?

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Carona

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2013

You have to have official acts in exchange for the gifts. And that's the part of the case that has always been lacking. … Corona to incriminate himself, there's nothing in that about gifts coming or official acts coming from Corona to Heidel.

Oral argument — Joseph Rollin v. Christine Cook

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2011

During that entire period. During that entire period. It starts to run again once you get a judgment. … They could not go to a mobile home where she had been living, because it had been completely cleaned out. Everything was in storage.

Oral argument — United States v. W.R. Grace

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2007

It was only when Judge Malloy entered a second series of orders that went to what some of the more substantive allegations would be and what the government would have to prove under the Clean Air Act that … The latency period for asbestos can be, for mesothelioma, can be anywhere from 25 to 40 years.

Oral argument — Sanchez v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2008

But clearly – That's exactly what the BIA case says, is that the commission of this disqualifying act beyond the 10-year period, looking backward from the date of the final administrative decision – that … But the 10-year period that you would apply for whether or not they've maintained continuous residence is the exact 10-year period you should be applying in determining the period for good moral character

Oral argument — Snyder & Associates Aquisition v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

But the—but the—but the comments made by the IRS that revealed some confidential information took place after that investigation. The tax investigation was over. Right. … You're taking the position here that you're just immune, period. So we haven't gotten to any of that yet.

Oral argument — Roberto Maldonado v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2014

Why isn't the correct analysis, the last known act and the last official act we have, is that he has been taken out of the jurisdiction of the United States? He's been removed. … I was going to say, in cleaning up our case, you didn't mention anything about Limas-Galvan in cleaning up our case law. Well, with respect to the jurisdictional issue. No, no, no. The impossibility.

Oral argument — Dejon White v. State of California

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2019

And so therefore, he's not acting in a vacuum. He's acting because the two officers brought this information to him. So therefore, they're the two officers who are discriminating. … But I direct you to Officer Pender's declaration because most of the hearsay statements were attributed to her having overheard comments made by Warren and Panisi.

Oral argument — Umpqua Valley Audubon Society v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2005

comments to the petitioners whenever they commented. … In fact, that's what is done in other similar situations where, for example, a licensee or other party is challenging the conditions of a Clean Water Act certification under Section 401 in state court.