Documents

Oral argument — Fournie v. Fournie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2010

I'm going to deal with the latter comment of Judge O'Malley in a second, Your Honor. … I agree that he didn't provide any efforts as far as working on the farms during that period of time and that he was not voluntarily given profits for that period of time, Your Honor.

Oral argument — City of Charleston v. System of Administrative Hearing of the City of Charleston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019

In that whole investigation period of 16, 17 minutes, there was never circumstances involving imminent danger requiring an urgent response. That he had to attend to. … All that's saying is, all I'm telling you with that information, Justice, is that the city made some comment or the city has made some comment. They believed, and Mr.

Oral argument — The Village of Onarga v. Atlas Excavation, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2019

There was never a period of time, there was never a gap when we sat back on our rights and didn't do anything. We constantly were working on trying to get the issues resolved. … There was never a period of time where we accepted the job, we thought it was working, and didn't do anything. That never happened.

Oral argument — People v. Loza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2019

I know that there are times when they make a comment about, you can't cover up somebody's no good. … You're talking about the statements are verbal acts, that's what you're saying. Right. How are these verbal acts relevant?

Oral argument — Hand v. Hand

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2018

They found that the relationship was centered within Illinois because they had been friends for a long period of time, and they felt that again, this accident was in the course of an act in the course … Comment D to the Restatement 146 provides a strong guidance on the interests of the states that are involved in the conflicts of law analysis.

Oral argument — Walsh v. Tarr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2010

That the action of the commission, both prior to and subsequent to its so acting, is void ab initio because the commission has acted in excess of any of its authority to dismiss the complaint or act upon … That's established in the record before the commission. 128 days is not a reasonable period of time.

Oral argument — Ryan v. Walsh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018

Both teachers were gone for a period of two to seven minutes. … One was the School Records Act, Student Records Act was adopted in the handbook.

Oral argument — Security Lumber & Supply v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2015

The 19B provision of the Act gives the authority. 19B says what? Gives the authority. To do what? For the commission to order which period is responsible. Well, I'm talking about reimbursement. … One quick comment on manifest way, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Doe v. Delnor Community Dane Health Systems

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 22, 2011

Persak, he comments on, and it says I was contacted 10 to 12 minute times by phone. That's right on the first page of the minutes. So he's commenting on these minutes at that time. … Isn't there some mechanism within the bylaws or the licensing act to prevent that from happening? I don't believe there's anything in any of the acts, either the federal act or the state act.

Oral argument — People v. Mikkelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2025

The court cited defendant's long period of grooming the girls as encouragement of the girls to make videos as traumatizing them forever, was the court's term. … And if you look at his comments, his comments are, we're here because the church didn't have things in place to stop this.

Oral argument — Sharp v. Board of Trustees of Employee's Retirement System

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2013

And he claims that his act of reliance was retired. … So, what does the 35-day period of review apply to, then, if not these circumstances? Well, Justice Turner, the 35-day period of review comes from the administrative review law.

Oral argument — Taylor v. Bradford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2024

it exists on the uniform act and texas was an appropriate place for her to be under the emergency clause of the uniform act as well i don't see especially given the fact there was nothing that prohibited … ruling that she did not wish to have aside from that and i think it's also clear that illinois is a home state and properly can exercise jurisdiction in this case aside from that the mother is making some comments

Oral argument — In re Custody of P.M.S.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2017

I purposely did not comment on it during my brief in chief. … new Parenting Act has come out has been looked at by trial courts throughout Southern Illinois, and that's what they had before we went to trial.

Oral argument — People v. Hommerson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2010

But they also proved by their own evidence that his wife was periodically running guns to hungry. … And Saunders said that he used the term agency, but this is not a legal act of agency. It was something other than a legal act of agency.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Ekiss

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2014

And it basically shows that during this period support for his wife, Carol. My client, Mr. Brinkhager, during cross-examination of Mrs. … In the middle of the page there's a comment. It starts at the top.

Oral argument — Davis v. Scheck

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2025

Now this complaint before the court does not go over the 15 years Ann owned it, but it's limited to the period 2018 to 2021. … And the second count seeks remedies under section 12.56 of the Business Corporation Act for oppressive conduct.

Oral argument — Reeves v. Ramp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2010

Under the Trade Secrets Act, an employer only has a right in its trade secrets as that term is defined under the act. … We sought to do that within the 30-day period. That was then set for hearing on May 14th.

Oral argument — In re: Marriage of Coleman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2020

So it was you who tied that comment into the argument that it was part of the good faith finding of the trial judge. Right? Well, I put it in that brief. … Court finds that respondent petitioner changed jobs voluntarily, period. Prior to changing jobs, respondent petitioner did not consult with the mother of the children, period.

Oral argument — State ex rel. Beeler, Schad & Diamond, P.C. v. Relax the Back Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2016

As just a beginning comment, I want to say that we are delighted today. This is Judge Dismikov's first oral argument. So happy to have her with us and looking forward to working with her. … But it definitely happened, it was definitely in good faith, and it definitely continued through the time period here.

Oral argument — People v. Pettis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2016

Officers acted in a way to ensure and protect their safety, the individuals in the car's safety, as well as their constitutional rights. … So there was a period of time where the search was, the tarry stop was extended to him. So, actually two periods of time.