Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.54s
Oral argument — Chartis Property Casualty Co v. Inganamort
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020
Additionally, there was a clean bill of lading where it showed that the vessel was in good shape. Here, there's no evidence that the vessel was in good shape before the loss. … And they were, Judge Krauss read you the pertinent paragraph, which says there wasn't any unusual rainfall in this period.
37 min of audioOral argument — Gianni-Paolo Ferrari v. Ford Motor Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2016
And the time period you have cited is within that time period. Okay. And, again, let me revisit the question of whether Mr. Ferrari was actually impaired by any alleged opiate use. … He, as of September, well, as of May 2013, he tested clean for opioids.
36 min of audioOral argument — Bankier Apartments v. Patel
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010
When I asked some of these witnesses, how much time did you spend, you know, if you thought it was dirty, how much time did you spend cleaning it? Did you hire anybody else to clean it? … The landlord cleaned the dishes and pots and pans, had their agent go in and clean the dishes, pots and pans, put them back up on the racks, had them clean the stove and remove the grease that was on top
45 min of audioOral argument — Fireman's Fund Ins v. Oregon Automobile
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2008
The way that these sites get cleaned up is by insurance money. Right. … So ultimately, NEMI, it turns out, have no coverage for the cost to clean this up.
38 min of audioOral argument — Thomas v. Transportation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2009
We set forth in the joint appendix extensive evidence regarding 57 errors and deviations in a similar time period. No one was treated as severely as Miss Thomas. … Thank you your honor, just a few comments. The government has said in their briefing here today that we could have addressed it on cross examination.
17 min of audioOral argument — Jack Roy v. Laborer's Local 737
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2021
It's included repeated comments over a two-year period, references by the COVR, defendant COVR, the individual who orchestrated this termination, introducing Mr. … These comments were stray comments, even though they were made by the person who orchestrated the termination and repeatedly made over a course of two years.
25 min of audioOral argument — Clark Co. Nat'l Res. v. Clark County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003
The letter regulation wasn't subject to notice and comment rulemaking. Another issue is that this same agency has already been found in violation of the Clean Water Act for this same issue. … The Clean Water Act does not provide any definition of what is meant by reducing to the maximum extent practicable.
39 min of audioOral argument — Ryan DeKeyser v. Thyssenkrupp Waupaca, Incorpor
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2017
Some departments have gigantic air hoods that suck up most of the particulate matter to get it out. … Well, I think that you follow the clean products decision. In the absence of a Daubert challenge, a district court may rely on expert evidence for class certification.
39 min of audioOral argument — KINITI-WAIRIMU, etc v. MUKASEY
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2009
Kiniti started on a clean slate with the IJA in the absence of improperly admitted research. … His father had been detained briefly for a period of 10 days, and he did not know the current whereabouts of his father at that time.
31 min of audioOral argument — Clarence Simon, Jr. v. Longnecker Properties, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2016
They've thrown all the slings in the middle and they require you to get up on the pipe, which is fine if the pipe is perfectly clean. If it's not perfectly clean, you're in big trouble. … So I will touch on the Jones Act and borrowed liability issue.
40 min of audioOral argument — Soria Gonzalez v. Holder
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2012
I respect the comment, but I am not in agreement with that assertion. What I would say, Your Honor, is the term, the proper term is the statutory bar expired. … The board acted well within its broad discretion to deny that motion to reopen. Does it make any difference if we remand?
37 min of audioOral argument — People v. Williams
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2018
Excuse me, there were air fresheners? That's what the deputy said. Yeah, there were air fresheners, multiple air fresheners present, I'm assuming. We don't know. That was given up, wasn't it? Yes. … They look at this, the period, the fourth amendment analysis, and Deputy Corey is to his testimonies. Do you believe that he really didn't see that registration?
37 min of audioOral argument — Janice LaRiviere v. Board Trustees of Southern Ill
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2019
So what do we make of the email comment about it being lonely? Sure. … So it's a newer building that was cleaned up before she went there.
18 min of audioOral argument — Gribben v. UPS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2008
of an air-conditioned cab, he's out in the sun a good part of the time the rest of the time. … Gribben is in his air-conditioned cab a great deal more of the time than he's out of his air-conditioned cab.
40 min of audioOral argument — City of Mattoon v. Quakenbush
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2026
He's cleaned up after their fires. He's cleaned up after the tornadoes. He's cleaned up after a lot of things. He has a working relationship with the city. … And one of the orders that the courts gave to us was to submit a plan to clean this property. And so we obeyed that court order and submitted a plan to clean the property.
45 min of audioOral argument — De Anda Bramasco v. Holder
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2009
period. … You mentioned at the outset of your comments that mediation would have been the most appropriate route. What's wrong with trying it now?
21 min of audioOral argument — Christopher Van Hollen, Jr. v. FEC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2015
But you're right, there were comments, and the comments did support the outcome that we have here. … The real concern was groups hiding behind what the Supreme Court called misleading and dubious names, like your Citizens for Better Medicare or your Republicans for Clean Air, who weren't disclosing the
47 min of audioOral argument — Midwest Generation, LLC v. Illinois Pollution Control Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2026
That's correct, and that's, there are, under the Act, you have variances and you have adjusted standards, and you're thinking of a variance. … So it was for a period of maybe a decade-ish that it remained inactive before it was seeded. Okay.
48 min of audioOral argument — Celerity v. Ultra Clean
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2008
The first being, obviously, the Declaratory Judgment Act. … Now, within that 20-day period, they filed the suit and never served us during that period, nor did they notify us of the suit.
57 min of audioOral argument — Donna Greene v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2014
Jeffrey Chin of Beering on behalf of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Carolyn W. Colvin. … That was just a benign comment.
38 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.