Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Shane Maggi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2009

First-degree murder would extend under 1153 under the Major Crimes Act. How about felon in possession of a firearm? … Your Honor, very briefly, with respect to the last comment made by counsel regarding the Blackfeet Tribal Code, the code is the code. It's the tribal law. It's not evidence.

Oral argument — In re: Sobayo

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2020

If that is done, I think, and then of course, within, to give me at least 120 days to make sure I get a lawyer or law firm that are loyal enough to help me clean up all this mess. … Ceballos might want to use that three-week period that he gave him to find counsel that he could speak with and that they could choose an appropriate remedy from there.

Oral argument — Michael Preston v. American Honda Motor Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2019

, so the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act It's it's a unique act because it was created to be more expansive than common law fraud It was created to be a remedial act and give consumers rights against deceptive … Thank you We believe that the district court aired When it when it found that we did not give the defendant proper notice or fair notice of the grounds of the claim Under rule 9b parties must state when

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Carona

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2013

You have to have official acts in exchange for the gifts. And that's the part of the case that has always been lacking. … Corona to incriminate himself, there's nothing in that about gifts coming or official acts coming from Corona to Heidel.

Oral argument — United States v. Marilee Holt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009

Briner was either as the result of a quarrel or in the commission of an unlawful act or in the commission of a lawful act without caution and circumspection. … One of the officers saw him doing karate moves and acting silly across the street.

Oral argument — United States v. Melchor-Zaragoza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003

Why isn't it harmless air, even if you're right? Well, I just submit to the Court it's not. … over a period of seven months and done at least for 200 victims.

Oral argument — Sanchez v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2008

But clearly – That's exactly what the BIA case says, is that the commission of this disqualifying act beyond the 10-year period, looking backward from the date of the final administrative decision – that … But the 10-year period that you would apply for whether or not they've maintained continuous residence is the exact 10-year period you should be applying in determining the period for good moral character

Oral argument — In re: SCHULTZ

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2019

I'd like to address Your Honor's first comment about the lack... Yeah, I saw you react to that. You thought there was admissible evidence. I've actually brought an exhibit on PACER. … What was the motivating factor for doing an act of abandonment?

Oral argument — United States v. Svetlana Yim

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014

She also said that she needs to get rest periods. So it's not like she just checks something. I mean, she's obviously... … It's not clean, but it's not as reasoned as the residual capacity questionnaires for chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia that she submitted with the appeal. And in those...

Oral argument — Yem v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2023

Holder tells us that there's no magic period of time that would be... … And as a result, he has only been managed to work manual labor jobs, most recently in the dry cleaning business.

Oral argument — United States v. Miguel Valle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

Right, that the government – where an issue has been fully aired below, the government doesn't get a second bite at the apple. The apple. Sorry, and that's Espinosa-Morales. … There, although admittedly, that was a much shorter period. There's no question that was a much shorter period.

Oral argument — G.E Capital Mortgage v. Maldonado

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2005

They did not act consistent with that position that they've taken during the course of litigation. Well, can I ask you just sort of a sequencing problem with the statute? … Just negligence in the air, negligence around harm is nothing. It's only when the IRS takes the money that you may be harmed. Right? I would respectfully disagree.

Oral argument — Gilmore v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2005

This is an administrative search, period. This is not a Terry search. … And this court has made that clear in Nevada Airlines and in San Diego Air Sports Center. There has to be a showing of an order. No, that there does not need to be.

Oral argument — Ivan Iontchev v. AAA Cab Service, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2017

He's a cab, gasoline, crelts, cleaning products, that sort of thing, but that's a pretty significant fact, isn't it? … But doesn't the driver have the economic incentive from the person owning it to pick up his pay fares and make as much money in a shorter period of time?

Oral argument — State of California v. The Little Sisters of the Poor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2018

If you compare RFRA with the Administrative Procedures Act, only one of them has a good cause exemption. … What comment could California add that the agency has simply not thought of because it didn't have the benefit of California's comments?

Oral argument — Patrick Caldwell v. Victoria Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2017

Well, if he was acting as the managing member of the limited liability company and was acting in that capacity, then he could make that transfer. … In that case, the property was clearly owned outside of the 1,215 day period, and it was the mere act of recording the homestead declaration, which in Nevada is a way to perfect the entitlement to the

Oral argument — DLS Precision Fab LLC v. ICE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2017

We can't just go through the air. Your honor, if I write something, it's going to have to do with the CTE something or some of these things of why the ALJ was wrong. … But it's really not, the government really is the leading or, if it wants to act, it can act, the Congress has made a determination that is going to hold at a certain point the government's interpretation

Oral argument — Donald Trump v. USDC-WAWSE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2020

to either to grant a stay or to act on the mandamus petitions and then until the court acts on that motion, that's of course proper, but the district court did not say that there was any contingency before … I mean, are they mostly like, I don't think I'm the right person to comment or I'm not going to comment or I guess I need to pull them up. But this was a surprise.

Oral argument — Fishermen's Finest Inc v. Carlos Gutierrez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2009

Fisheries Act hauler fleet. … But that doesn't tell me you should use a time period when they do something different than they're allowed to do now.

Oral argument — Duarte v. Begrin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2008

She didn't act on the basis of her actual understanding, but she told them things were worse than she understood it to be? … And my comments are based simply that some of the facts that if this was an embroidered story, there were facts in it that were verified by a later determination that Ms.