Documents

Oral argument — People v. Hommerson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2010

But they also proved by their own evidence that his wife was periodically running guns to hungry. … And Saunders said that he used the term agency, but this is not a legal act of agency. It was something other than a legal act of agency.

Oral argument — McNeil v. Ketchens

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2009

But in any event, in this case, it was a period, what the Haight said was it was sometime in January 1983 to February 25th, 1983. … But I think it is fair to say they looked at this period of a month to a month and a half.

Oral argument — Shelton v. OSF Saint Francis Medical Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2013

Okay, so the denial was with respect to the date and not the act of ending the employment. As I said, there is absolutely disagreement as to what the specific date is. … Just some brief comments. Justice McDade, you have commented on Attorney Newen's letter, essentially saying, is this just setting up a situation for job abandonment?

Oral argument — Davis v. Scheck

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2025

Now this complaint before the court does not go over the 15 years Ann owned it, but it's limited to the period 2018 to 2021. … And the second count seeks remedies under section 12.56 of the Business Corporation Act for oppressive conduct.

Oral argument — State ex rel. Beeler, Schad & Diamond, P.C. v. Relax the Back Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2016

As just a beginning comment, I want to say that we are delighted today. This is Judge Dismikov's first oral argument. So happy to have her with us and looking forward to working with her. … But it definitely happened, it was definitely in good faith, and it definitely continued through the time period here.

Oral argument — Ruhl Commercial Co., LLC v. RJR Holdings, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 18, 2024

But it was during the period of the time. … Unless this court has any questions, I'll conclude my comments and thank you for your time. Thank you, counsel.

Oral argument — 1-19-1811

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2021

The only mention of any time period in the statute itself is in section 3.7C, which is the section regarding child-related expenses. And it mentions, quote-unquote, the most recent 12-month period. … No comments from me. Okay, we'll hear a rebuttal, Mr. DiDomenico. Thanks. I don't have much, just a couple of points. The singulatary case, we talked about that.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Ekiss

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2014

And it basically shows that during this period support for his wife, Carol. My client, Mr. Brinkhager, during cross-examination of Mrs. … In the middle of the page there's a comment. It starts at the top.

Oral argument — In re Custody of P.M.S.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2017

I purposely did not comment on it during my brief in chief. … new Parenting Act has come out has been looked at by trial courts throughout Southern Illinois, and that's what they had before we went to trial.

Oral argument — People v. Conroy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2019

They're all separated by commas or some sort of quotation mark or punctuation that requires us to read this, this, this, and this until we get to the period. … The National Review article was just one commentator's opinion. It is one commentator's opinion. I don't know that that's the opinion of the editorial board of the National Review.

Oral argument — Reeves v. Ramp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2010

Under the Trade Secrets Act, an employer only has a right in its trade secrets as that term is defined under the act. … We sought to do that within the 30-day period. That was then set for hearing on May 14th.

Oral argument — In Matter of Estate of Meyers

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2015

The first reason is simply that he failed or attempted to step around the probate act. … That's the predecessor to the current act. It basically says the same thing.

Oral argument — Doyle v. Doyle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2015

Ken Doyle admitted to, and that is what the judge is basing judgmental cleanings on, solely on this letter. … How he would prove that I don't know, his mother was deceased, did man's act, if he's going to say that the agreement was such that I'm going to pay only when I can or I can afford it, that would be his

Oral argument — Guvenoz v. Target Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2015

But the Mensing comment about whether it's pre- or post-fida has nothing to do with the preemption analysis. … Oh, the B is there has to be a regime in which there is absolute liability, where you don't have commentators.

Oral argument — Chlada v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2015

There was a period while he was working a lesser-paying job, but he was not at maximum medical improvement yet. Okay, so it wasn't during the same time period. Correct. … Well, but I think Justice Holder's comment was it's maximum right in either direction. Based upon the lesser rate. The maximum temporary total or permanent disability.

Oral argument — Tatum v. Allstate Indemnity Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 22, 2011

Larson, and I'm going to throw that out so that we can get a response from your opponent if he cares to comment on it. … I'd like to comment on that, because I know how you finish it off in your brief.

Oral argument — In Matter of Estate of Herrin

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2011

I think the Probate Act also clearly mandatorily requires that if there's going to be a distribution before the 12-month period, the claims period, that that can be done, but it has to be done with approval … I think the Probate Act requires that a statement be kept open for the requisite six-month claims period.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Schreacke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2015

A number of things happened between those two dates and during that nine-month period. … But that is what happens when adults can't act like adults.

Oral argument — In re: Marriage of Coleman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2020

So it was you who tied that comment into the argument that it was part of the good faith finding of the trial judge. Right? Well, I put it in that brief. … Court finds that respondent petitioner changed jobs voluntarily, period. Prior to changing jobs, respondent petitioner did not consult with the mother of the children, period.

Oral argument — People v. Pettis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2016

Officers acted in a way to ensure and protect their safety, the individuals in the car's safety, as well as their constitutional rights. … So there was a period of time where the search was, the tarry stop was extended to him. So, actually two periods of time.