Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.89s
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 14, 2015
Air Act. … Air Act.
80 FR 40913Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 2, 2015
Response to Comments EPA received one comment on the July 14, 2015 proposal with respect to air quality measurements. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 59620Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 2, 2004
The final rule implements section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) by requiring these operations to meet HAP emission standards reflecting the application of the maximum achievable control technology … The semiannual compliance reporting requirements may be satisfied by reports required under other parts of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
69 FR 130Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 17, 2012
EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period on the NPR, published April 11, 2012 (77 FR 21702). The public comment period for EPA's NPR closed on May 11, 2012. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 41916Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Utah; Source Category Exemptions
Federal Register · Rule · May 27, 2021
We invited comments on all aspects of our proposed rulemaking and provided a 30-day comment period. The comment period ended on April 15, 2021. II. … Response to Comments We received no comments during the public comment period. III.
86 FR 28493Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Indiana; Two Revised Sulfur Dioxide Rules for Lake County
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 7, 2021
Public Comments EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period for the February 11, 2021, proposed rule. The comment period ended on March 15, 2021. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
86 FR 30201Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 7, 2013
(1) Clean Air Act Section 110 Requirements Section 110(a)(2) of the CAA contains general requirements for nonattainment plans. … Does the plan meet the Clean Air Act requirements for contingency provisions?
78 FR 900Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 13, 2002
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 68767Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 3, 2019
This action is being taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”) and its implementing regulations. DATES: This rule will be effective on January 2, 2020. … Public Comments The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. No comments were received. III.
84 FR 66074Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 10, 2003
The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. … Air Act.
68 FR 58613Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 30, 1996
All public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. … Section 172(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act requires nonattainment areas to adopt, at a minimum, RACT to reduce emissions from existing sources.
61 FR 55894Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 9, 2004
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 71375Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 16, 2024
Air Act (CAA or “the Act”). … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we did not receive any comments. III.
89 FR 42808Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; California; Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 4, 2021
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
86 FR 60771Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; New York; Knowlton Technologies LLC
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 24, 2025
The comment period ended on January 10, 2025. We received no comments on the EPA's action. III. What action is the EPA taking? … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 13414Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; North Carolina; Revisions to Exclusionary Rules and Permit Exemptions
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 18, 2022
EPA is approving these revisions pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: This rule is effective November 17, 2022. … Air Act. . . .”
87 FR 62990Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Pinal County Air Quality Control District
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 17, 2012
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments on Rule 5-24-1032. III. … Air Act.
77 FR 22676Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 2, 1999
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 29563Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Control of Gasoline Volatility
Federal Register · Rule · May 25, 2007
During the comment period for the March 29, 2007, proposal we received several comments from 16 commenters including the API and the Regional Air Pollution Control Agency (RAPCA) of Dayton, Ohio. … The commenter concludes that “USEPA should fully evaluate the necessity of such lower RVP fuel in accordance with section 211(c)(4)(C) of the Clean Air Act.”
72 FR 29269Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 4, 2006
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period we did not receive any comments. III. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
71 FR 244Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.