Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
5,768 results
0.14s
Oral argument — United States v. Vera Kuzmenko
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2019
There is something disquieting about the notion that if you make a false statement to a person who is also acting fraudulently and they don't care about it because they have their own motives for fraud … As far as I was understanding the description, it was the amount of the loan minus what the House sold for, period. Did you figure that much out? We could figure that much out. All right.
42 min of audioOral argument — Rony Romero v. Martin O'Malley
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2024
And 12 months just wasn't randomly picked out of the air. It's not always in the palm. It's in the statute that it has to be over 12. … The RFC is remember and carry out simple routine tasks for up to two-hour periods of time with only occasional interaction with the general public. Am I misreading that?
23 min of audioOral argument — Steven Valdez v. Philip Neuman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2010
And the provision is section 8 of the Mesa Copyright Act. Well, what it says is that the debt will be assumed upon verification. Correct. Okay. … Well, I would say, to riff off your comment, Your Honor, I think that that's potentially an option.
39 min of audioOral argument — PICTURE IT SOLD, INC v. ISOLD IT
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 15, 2006
I have some responses to some of the comments made in the opening argument. It's your time. Use it as you wish. … It's my understanding that once a concern was raised on the part of picture it sold, that decision was implemented sometime shortly thereafter or some period thereafter.
43 min of audioOral argument — Mishewal Wappo Tribe of AV v. Sally Jewell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2017
Congress hasn't acted on the California Rancherty Act since it was established in 57. This is a critical case in a critical time. … And in the reply brief, Mishawalwapo had the opportunity to go through and explain where they thought they had aired this other theory in the district court and it did not do so in the reply brief.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. VARGAS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2005
I think it's I personally and honestly, I think it's I think it would be important to permit the in bank, not because we disagree with the opinion, but we believe that it should be aired aired out fully … Dugdale, I believe, that over a period of time he had come back numerous times. He passed through the border and he left footprints there.
36 min of audioOral argument — Pit River Tribe v. USFS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2010
Or water discharge permits where there are applications for periodic renewal. … But you have authority in this court in the Air America case saying that 558.
55 min of audioOral argument — Rafael Diaz-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2022
Yeah, they didn't look at dictionary definitions of the key terms and compare them at what time period before. … My comment is addressed to the board's expertise to be defining these crimes in the first place.
73 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Mendoza
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2006
It can mean the defendant acting. It does not require that the defendant acted for financial gain, just that someone did. … And I commented that on closing argument.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. King
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2026
So we know that there's a 48-hour period that contains the relevant evidence. … The third party Techs Now also did not act as a government agent. The government only made the request to the third party Techs Now to preserve the data.
30 min of audioOral argument — Francisco Reyes-Corado v. Merrick Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2023
I just want to make a clean record. So where's the third one? I'm also looking at a Valentine's Day threat in 2009, February 14, 2009, which was directed at his mother and sister. … Why isn't there a pattern of threats here, extending a far longer period of time than what was before the immigration judge, and the motivation is different?
23 min of audioOral argument — Peter Thomas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2013
It's the same state act that expunges a conviction. … Because that statute said the BIA can detain an alien beyond the deportation period.
19 min of audioOral argument — Ivan Iontchev v. AAA Cab Service, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2017
He's a cab, gasoline, crelts, cleaning products, that sort of thing, but that's a pretty significant fact, isn't it? … But doesn't the driver have the economic incentive from the person owning it to pick up his pay fares and make as much money in a shorter period of time?
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. 191.07 Acres of Land
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006
Or Dow would have held – Dow discussed the Tucker Act and said that inverse condemnation lies only in the court of claims pursuant to the Tucker Act. … Because KOK was a pure inverse condemnation action brought pursuant to the Mining and the Parks Act, did not address the Declaration of Takings Act, did not address condemnation with Declaration of Takings
40 min of audioOral argument — Pickens v. Barnhart
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2007
This is not like Aloha Air, where a witness is making assertions about things where she doesn't possibly have the personal knowledge about them. … Pickens must establish that she's disabled under the Rehabilitation Act. And it's not enough for her to show that she has a medical condition or an impairment.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lonny Ennen
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2011
Because of my comments to my smate, I'd also add that Trooper Cook didn't ask can I come in. He didn't say thanks for letting me come on in. You can hear him barging into that. … There was humidity in the air. There was something that suggested that there was something living there that was marijuana rather than something that had been smoked. That is correct.
21 min of audioOral argument — Shellenberger v. AIG WarrantyGuard, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2026
Is there a Consumer Protection Act claim in this case? Yes, of course, there's a Consumer Protection Act claim in this case. … It was September 2022 to February 2023, where she's cleaning out the black set in her. Thank you. Yeah, I appreciate that clarification. And you go. I don't know why.
57 min of audioOral argument — Tifow v. Holder
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2008
If you look at the critical facts here, that in a five-week period, Mr. … And then she goes back and three days later says, you know, the guy's just full of hot air. And that seems very strange.
23 min of audioOral argument — Callie Maidhof v. Mitchell Celaya
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2015
They cleaned up after themselves. They went out of their way to avoid any. But they still, you're not contesting that they shouldn't have been arrested or cited, are you? I am. … Well, Your Honor, I think it's clear in the law that engaging in acts of civil disobedience is protected by the First Amendment.
33 min of audioOral argument — Bart Kimber v. Ray Mabus
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015
Because the Navy's failure to act in accordance with these regulations, number one, and the Navy's failure to act totally contrary to these regulations, those two things operated over a period of literally … So the employing agency is involved over an extended period of time, and that's what our complaint is about. It's about their involvement over an extended period of time.
27 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.