Documents

Oral argument — United States v. 191.07 Acres of Land

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006

Or Dow would have held – Dow discussed the Tucker Act and said that inverse condemnation lies only in the court of claims pursuant to the Tucker Act. … Because KOK was a pure inverse condemnation action brought pursuant to the Mining and the Parks Act, did not address the Declaration of Takings Act, did not address condemnation with Declaration of Takings

Oral argument — GIANNETTI v. THE BURLINGTON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2005

Looking at the four corners of the complaint, originally five, all we know is that it is asserted that Giannetti Feldman were negligent, period, and that resulted in property damage. … It's out of acts of negligence, and we are an insured under the policy. The burden then shifts.

Oral argument — Ward v. Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2012

It's not plain air. It's the unreasonable determination. But in both cases, we're supposed to look at the evidence and sense the state court of appeals doesn't articulate the reason. … He acted like a dinosaur, an alligator. He saw daddy put mommy on the hook. He was afraid of Sean. He didn't ever want to see him again. Now, I know you have a four-and-a-half-year-old boy. So do I.

Oral argument — City of Tombstone v. USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2012

The city was also able to clean out one of the other springs, car springs, with hand equipment because there was very little damage there. … Scalia, you can comment on this. Well, counsel, you heard counsel say that they've been doing this for years, until recently, until this issue developed.

Oral argument — Oliver C. v. EDU-HI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2019

Would your position be that the Honolulu School District would have to incur the transportation costs of transporting him every day by air from Maui to Honolulu and back? … And so during that period of time of that one-month period, the personnel that would be working with Oliver had received training in ASL.

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Stoltz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2013

The Coast Guard acted in good faith. They acted in good faith in coordinating with the U.S. Attorney's Office early on. … Punishment for one of them, in terms of nonjudicial punishment, didn't come until ten months after the act. And the other defendants also similarly were long periods of time.

Oral argument — Pit River Tribe v. USFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2010

Or water discharge permits where there are applications for periodic renewal. … But you have authority in this court in the Air America case saying that 558.

Oral argument — PICTURE IT SOLD, INC v. ISOLD IT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 15, 2006

I have some responses to some of the comments made in the opening argument. It's your time. Use it as you wish. … It's my understanding that once a concern was raised on the part of picture it sold, that decision was implemented sometime shortly thereafter or some period thereafter.

Oral argument — Steven Valdez v. Philip Neuman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2010

And the provision is section 8 of the Mesa Copyright Act. Well, what it says is that the debt will be assumed upon verification. Correct. Okay. … Well, I would say, to riff off your comment, Your Honor, I think that that's potentially an option.

Oral argument — Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. USS-POSCO Industries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2015

But a market allocation is also violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Correct. … Steel was not competing during this period of conspiracy is refuted directly by the record. It didn't exit the market, and it stayed in it.

Oral argument — United States v. GOSSMAN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2005

And in each one of these, the very first sentence says, You have accepted responsibility to act on behalf of Rose Dreischfeld. … This comment was made in the context of a direct response to that.

Oral argument — Kaur v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2006

We're trying so hard to clean up our act. And I don't remember who the judge was in this case, but it's unlikely. And I think we could certainly request it. But remand isn't required here. … If you have one more comment, we will interrupt you.

Oral argument — United States v. Gonzalez-Valdez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2008

This would be air under the, clearly air in the Sixth Circuit under Peters and Thomas, and I think this is consistent with this court's case law, particularly in Cardi. … In fact, it continued the sentencing hearing for a significant period of time in order to allow her to fully develop her sentencing memorandum.

Oral argument — The ACT Group, Inc. v. James Hamlin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2017

Served to be common, standard statements, comments, phrases used in this industry. Industry of training, salesman of air conditioning equipment. … The comment that we hear is the separation of these... of Mr. Hamlin from the anti-corruption group. Mr.

Oral argument — Decker Coal Company v. Jerry Pehringer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2021

Well, we cited the law that they are removing bullet air. No, that's an example of how the Secretary of Labor cannot be impeded in removing judicial officers. … And my comment to Mr. Salzman is I can understand what you're saying in the context of workers' compensation, but I can see it.

Oral argument — Shellenberger v. AIG WarrantyGuard, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2026

Is there a Consumer Protection Act claim in this case? Yes, of course, there's a Consumer Protection Act claim in this case. … It was September 2022 to February 2023, where she's cleaning out the black set in her. Thank you. Yeah, I appreciate that clarification. And you go. I don't know why.

Oral argument — United States v. King

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2026

So we know that there's a 48-hour period that contains the relevant evidence. … The third party Techs Now also did not act as a government agent. The government only made the request to the third party Techs Now to preserve the data.

Oral argument — Dale Dowers v. NationStar Mortgage, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2016

They were there to enforce, to keep the trust clean. In addition to that, the letter does not have any of the typical indicia. It says of an attempt to collect a debt, it wasn't its primary purpose. … Clearly, with respect to debt collectors, you're right, but the question is how much does the act apply to people who have this other more limited function?

Oral argument — Menken v. Emm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2007

If she has, I'll comment more in my rebuttal, unless the Court has questions. I'll move to the merits of the case. … Yes, and the specific Federal law of reference is the Uniform Enforcement of Judgment Act.

Oral argument — Sentry Ins. a Mutual v. American National

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

And it looked at it for a period of time and then decided that it did not owe a defense or coverage? That's correct. It had actually an initially assigned counsel. … The MFM machine could not have ever caused this fire because it had an air chuck and air would not have... Where do we get coverage for failure to warn?