Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.09s
Amicus Curiae Brief — City of New York v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
This Court may take judicial notice of the immediate grave threat-of air pollution Yo our country. … The consent. decree in its present form enjoins the de- fendants from continuing the acts alleged to be in violation of the Sherman Act.
397 U.S. 248Amicus Curiae Brief — Sturgeon v. Masica, 136 S. Ct. 27 (2015) (No. 14-1209)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
, 43 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. ...............ccccceeeees 10, 11, 20 Alaska Statehood Act, Pub. … Air Act—commenting that such universally applicable laws would be “unaffected by the passage of this bill.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Boechler, P.C., Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2021
. § 6330 ............................................... passim iv Taxpayer First Act, Pub. L. … See Taxpayer First Act, Pub. L. No. 116-25, § 1001, 133 Stat. 981, 983 (2019).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of the Everglades v. South Florida Water Management District
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
There will be no Clean Water Act protection for transfers by which a myriad of pollutants might be dumped into a clean and healthy water body. … It is hard to imagine a decision more at odds with the purposes of the Clean Water Act.
562 U.S. 1082Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
tion of the questions presented STATEMENT Through the initiative process, Arizona's citizens have enacted the Citizens Clean Eleetions Aet (Arizona Act or Act), Ariv. Rev. Stat. … Br. 54-55, Clean Elee- tions Inst. Resp. Bro 47-48.
562 U.S. 1060Amicus Curiae Brief — Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
No. 107-118, 115 SD, a cnnisnninicentnnncninenaniiitnaninineniaiieaiinnsl 6 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(€) .............cccccceccceseceeseeeenes 27 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation … Although many states have adopted some version of one of two uniform contribution acts, the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act and the Uniform Comparative Fault Act, the availability of such
543 U.S. 157Amicus Curiae Brief — Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
Title I of that Act, the ‘* Airport and Air- way Development Act of 1970,’ authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to make grants of $840 million for public airport development over a four-year period … The Government’s brief, when compared with these comments on the 1972 Act and the Opinion of the Depart- ment of Transportation filed in the Massachusetts case in 1971, demonstrates that the Secretary
411 U.S. 624Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2024
Amici or their members have for decades operated under Clean Water Act (“CWA” or “Act”) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permits as they provide stormwater and sanitation services … EPA, Watershed Academy Web: Introduction to the Clean Water Act § 34, https://cfpub.epa.gov/watertrain/moduleFrame.cfm?parent_object_id=2673.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
This suit was brought under the Clean Water Act's citizen suit provision. … Unlike the CWA, the EPCRA does not establish liability for discharges that exceed permit limitations like the Clean Water Act.
528 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — City of New York v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
\The period since then has been occupied with the writing and printing of this brief. … The Air Pellution Control District has expended. approximately. $60,000,000. of “pulilic funds since its creation under the Act.
397 U.S. 248Amicus Curiae Brief — Dutra Grp. v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 627 (2018) (No. 18-266)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
.. cece cccccccccce eens 12 Clean Water Act § 311, 33 U.S.C. § 1321.................... 18 Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 |RSS eae ie AE a passim vii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES — Continued … Civil Code § 3956 (1912) as “a statute in South Carolina similar to Lord Campbell’s Act.” Sea- board Air Line Railway v. Koennecke, 239 U.S. 352, 353 (1915).
Amicus Curiae Brief — BASF Metals Limited, et al., Petitioners v. KPFF Investment, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 10, 2023
App. 47 (cleaned up). … Burger King, 471 U.S. at 471-72 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Chevron USA Inc. v. Echazabal
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
But litigating positions taken by agencies are not accorded the same deference as regulations implemented after notice and comment, as were the Rehabilitation Act regulations on which we rely. … United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 482 (1999).
536 U.S. 73Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2026
CITs are exempt from the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Securities Act of 1933. … And ERISA requires periodic reports to the Department of Labor.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Water Act. … Amici agree with petitioners and with the federal respondents that the Clean Water Act’s plain lan- guage is dispositive: The Act creates a bifurcated permitting scheme and mandates that any material
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 6, 2023
FERC found that the California State Water Resources Control Board (“State Water Board”) did not waive its authority under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1341. … Research Service, Clean Water Act Section 401: Background and Issues 6 (July 2, 2015).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Enactment of Clean Water Act................... … The Clean Water Act (CWA) establishes two major permit programs in furtherance of its goal of controlling 7 water pollution.
547 U.S. 715Amicus Curiae Brief — Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
The Copyright Act already embodies First Amendment protection in its “distinction between copyrightable expression and uncopyrightable facts and ideas, and the latitude for scholarship and comment traditionally … At the time the album As Clean As They Wanna Be was about to be released, 2 Live Crew had already released two albums that had “gone Gold” (87a) — that is, sold more than 500,000 units (324a).
510 U.S. 569Amicus Curiae Brief — Percipient.ai, Inc., Petitioner v. United States, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 7, 2025
Comm. on Homeland Sec. & Governmental Affs., The Air Force’s Expeditionary Combat Support System (ECCS) 1 (July 7, 2014), perma.cc/JUR8-78AZ. … App.19 (cleaned up). Because Congress defined “interested party” in the Competition in Contracting Act (“CICA”), the majority believed, the term must have the same meaning in §1491.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
A CONTRARY DECISION WOULD ERODE THE MEANING AND INTENT OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT. … Because the Tenth Circuit properly interpreted the Clean Water Act as favoring clean water, in agreement with the prima facie language of the Clean Water Act and Congress’ policy, and becuase this Honorable
503 U.S. 91
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.