Documents

Oral argument — Nelson Pleitez-Bermudez v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2022

Because the threats were directed to him, his wife, and his two minor children, they all fled together, a short period of time after the threats were made. … But I don't think we got a clean holding out of the BIA that that was a cognizable group, did we? Or out of our court? I think we only said that, well, even the problem is she can't get out of it.

Oral argument — Quinteros Ramos v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010

They can't store all of this stuff forever, so they clean it out every so often. … Did the judge act arbitrarily, irrationally, and contrary to law? And under the circumstances here, the immigration judge did not.

Oral argument — DELGADILLO v. HICKMAN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2004

Your Honor, if this was a completely ineffectual suicide attempt or an act of flingering, I'm not familiar enough with the Lanterman-Peters Short Act, which is, I believe, the name of the act that allows … Maybe I was misunderstanding then because there's also a comment in the report and recommendations that says, I'm trying to find it now.

Oral argument — Aaron Killgore v. Specpro Professional Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2022

Let's not have anybody sign that or Army, Air Force. … So that suggests to me that it's not only the completed act of signing an assessment, but also the prospective act of signing an assessment if the belief is there, the reasonable belief that that may violate

Oral argument — Acmet, Inc. v. The Wet Seal, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2017

So the order, same page as 633 says, Tony will arrange air shipment for that. … We appreciate the arguments and comments from all three of you. The case just argued is submitted.

Oral argument — Lei v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2007

Do you have a comment on that? Yes, I do, Your Honor. … Just this comment. Finish your sentence.

Oral argument — Karmen Self-Forbes v. Advanced Call Ctr. Techs., LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 16, 2018

A few weeks later, in November of 2016, ACT deposed Ms. Forbes. And at that deposition, she had no recollection of any dates that she had spoken to anyone from ACT. … Plaintiff or anyone else, I believe one was dead air and one was a voicemail. We didn't leave a message.

Oral argument — United States v. Juvenile Male

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006

And the second concerns the divergent goals between the Sentencing Reform Act and the Juvenile Delinquency Act. … The policy behind the Juvenile Delinquency Act is clear.

Oral argument — Verizon California, Inc. v. Peevey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2005

West, that was something that was up in the air. The Court noted that there was a mere possibility of a true-up, but as to the question of how does the concession by U.S. … They've now asked the commission to file an additional round of comments. So any pushback in the date that the commission expects a final decision has not been to the commission's delay.

Oral argument — Tifow v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2008

If you look at the critical facts here, that in a five-week period, Mr. … And then she goes back and three days later says, you know, the guy's just full of hot air. And that seems very strange.

Oral argument — Leslie Crawford v. City of Bakersfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019

And during that period of time, who knows what could have happened during that period of time. No, I understand that. … Dozer was acting at the time.

Oral argument — United States v. Yasith Chhun

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2013

Well, I appreciate the court's comment. I respectfully disagree in light of all the circumstances of this case. … That's why we're challenging the at-peace jury instruction, and as I put, if I can do as an aside here, the government's argued it's plain air.

Oral argument — Alex Cannara v. Karla Nemeth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2021

issued a proposed decision, the comments were received at the proposed decision, and then they addressed the comments in the final decision. … It just was brought out of thin air. And we're told now you're going to pay $10.5 billion. Where does the idea that you can't change it for 17 years? You cannot change the decision for 17 years.

Oral argument — United States v. Sixto Padilla-Gomez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2013

discovery in the context of standard Discovery not expert discovery so our position is the dog handler or the dog is not an expert didn't require expert disclosure and the only issue really is did the judge air … testimony that Smelling marijuana or smelling deodorizers or that are that are consistent, but some of it wasn't written in a report It just came up at the time of the hearing I believe the I believe the the comment

Oral argument — United States v. JIMENEZ-BORJA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2004

general, as we pointed out, a general motion for acquittal, which, in the cases that we've cited, is criticized because of the idea of a rule 29 motion is to give the government and the court a chance to clean … Well, in Ruelas, if you don't do the last act to complete the offense, you haven't got an offense. Let me ask you about another paragraph following up on Judge Kaczynski.

Oral argument — Banquels v. Chef America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2006

In this case, the answer is everything, because the law that we're dealing with here is not the American with Disability Act, but it's called the Fair Employment and Housing Act, and so therefore we have … But the point is he never responded, period. Never gave any of the information that you're trying to cobble together today is a reason.

Oral argument — United States v. Lonny Ennen

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2011

Because of my comments to my smate, I'd also add that Trooper Cook didn't ask can I come in. He didn't say thanks for letting me come on in. You can hear him barging into that. … There was humidity in the air. There was something that suggested that there was something living there that was marijuana rather than something that had been smoked. That is correct.

Oral argument — Robert Sherman v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

But if you go into either McFarland or into Mosher, they both find, at 386, McFarland says he's moderately limited in his ability to maintain attention, concentration for extended periods. … Moser questioned his overall motivation to work, and I would say the credibility of his disability claim, and made the comments about his lifestyle choice and the use of marijuana.

Oral argument — United States v. Burt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2005

Thank you for your comments. With no further questions, I thank the court for its time. May it please the court, my name is Jeffrey Jacobson, I represent the United States in this case. … That she intended to commit this criminal act. That she intended to assist the – that she intentionally committed these acts.

Oral argument — United States v. Polar Star Alaska Housing Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2011

It's the Declaration of Takings Act. That is the eminent domain act that's applicable to the government. And in fact, remember also, Judge, that all of this is hindsight. … The lease was renewed, the project lease was renewed, through the same period of time that the renewal or the taking would have occurred.