Documents

Oral argument — People v. Hearn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2011

He could have taken his time and carefully and thoughtfully wrote out his comments, chose not to do it. … He was on witness stand for an extensive period of time. It certainly appeared that he was able to do that.

Oral argument — Mercy Crystal Lake Hospital & Medical Center v. Illinois Health Facilities & Services Review Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2014

Here, what's the purpose of that act? … period that could have swayed their vote from, you know, the initial tie to being approved.

Oral argument — Standard Mutual Insurance Co. v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2012

And when they discover it, act promptly. That's the essence of the discovery rule. The passage of time does little to increase the problems of proof. … We cite comments by Representative Pedersen in the House where he acknowledged that automobile policies are often written for six months.

Oral argument — Independent Trust Co. v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2011

Now let me offer you another possibility and ask you to comment on it, okay? Let us suppose that the language of the statute says claim or right of action, okay? … It starts the six-month period for that. It starts the two-year period to file the lawsuit. And it all expires upon the appointment of the receiver.

Oral argument — Board v. Entrican

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2012

So even though the statute says the two-year period shall not apply to periods of time when the natural mother or the child refuses to submit to DNA tests, if she's already agreed to submit to DNA tests … Newsom both cited the committee comments from the senator who proposed the bill.

Oral argument — Mueth v. Mueth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2017

Under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act, the custodian has certain duties. … That is contrary to law and should, if not be commented on, it should not be allowed to stand. That should not be a precedence.

Oral argument — People v. Skinner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2013

The evidentiary hearing in the Post-Conviction Hearing Act is not for the purpose of holding an inquiry into what was actually said in the juror room and whether it would be extraneous or not. … First of all, one comment on the reliance on Hobley. Hobley actually in fact was reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing, and Hobley was ultimately exonerated and is free right now.

Oral argument — Illinois School District Agency v. Board of Education of East Aurora School District 131

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2022

Argument for the appellant, cross-appellant, is her not the right to comment. Both sides ready to proceed? Ms. Petretti, you may proceed. Good morning. May it please the Court. … They can also report a claim, but a sexual abuse occurrence has to be reported within the period of the – within 60 days after the period of the policy.

Oral argument — City of Chicago v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2016

The imposition of the 19, as the case law states, the imposition of the 19K penalties in Section 16 attorney's fees is discretionary and requires an award of additional compensation under the Act. … No, he renders his opinion saying that there should be the discogram, but he doesn't comment on the results of the discogram at all. Well, how could he comment if he hadn't done it?

Oral argument — Jane Doe-3 v. County Unit District No. 5 Board of Directors

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2014

There were two victims of White in McLean for acts he committed, felony acts he committed prior to the passing. And there were eight victims in Urbana for felony acts he committed after the passing. … Well, discovery would have been allowed at a minimum for 13 months from the time period this case was returned from the Supreme Court back to the trial court. And so that time period existed.

Oral argument — People v. Kendrick

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2022

For example, the Juvenile Court Act defines an adult to be someone who's age 21 and over. … Also, that was my comment. I wanted to see those cases. As I sit here right now, I would disagree. But if you say that you have them, I'd like to see them.

Oral argument — People v. Ealy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2015

And the law provides that to act intentionally necessarily means that you've acted knowingly. There are two ways to charge murder. … But was there any other evidence that we're aware of that any of these other tenants had asked somebody for a loan for a period of time, a period of time before, and that this pattern of paying rent had

Oral argument — Basheer v. American Service Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2011

Or in the case law, I agree with Justice McBride, it's not clear whether that act is required or whether the act of actually filing a lawsuit within that period of time is required. … Your Honor, just one comment. The six-month situation is right in our policy.

Oral argument — People v. Araiza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2022

I agree with your comment earlier. I think at this point, in light of the fact that it's- If that's true, isn't that a pretty strong indication that the issue's not justiciable? … I'm standing, so I'm going to attempt to do a distinguished comment. Please, if you want to tell us why that's- I'm sorry, Your Honor, I couldn't hear the case. Oh, I'm sorry, the Conkle case?

Oral argument — HSBC Bank USA v. Luckett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2011

Well, by that time, it's a two-and-a-half-year period. They lived there during that period? Yes. The judgment of foreclosure was entered June 5, 2009. … There's very general factual conclusion type comments. For example, in the motion to stay sale, Mr. Luckett signed an affidavit.

Oral argument — McNeil v. Ketchens

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2009

But in any event, in this case, it was a period, what the Haight said was it was sometime in January 1983 to February 25th, 1983. … But I think it is fair to say they looked at this period of a month to a month and a half.

Oral argument — Dillon v. DTG Operations

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2011

And the law that was sued under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act has a fee-shifting provision and it's similar to the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act. … The statute, section 6.1.113.2 of the Colorado Act, authorizes a fee award as follows.

Oral argument — Artega v. Simpson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2023

Okay, I apologize for that, Mr Kelly, could you just simply comment on the prejudice claim by Stephen, and as found by the trial court. … And so I think it's important to note that, again, with this abuse of discretion standards, no reasonable person would have adopted this view, the court acts arbitrarily or ignores principles of law.

Oral argument — People v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2018

But the act, the criminal act was, just as you said, taking a credit card, an office credit card? Yes. And buying personal items with it. Correct. Okay. … These periodic payments had nothing to do with the credit card.

Oral argument — People v. Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2026

But whether Derrick acted under strong provocation was not the only issue at sentencing. … The state offered no evidence that Derrick could not be rehabilitated in a short period of time.