Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
5,768 results
0.08s
Oral argument — Caroline Connor v. Unum Life Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2022
She was in the office around that period of time, and actually quite more. … So is that part of whether there's clear air, whether there was a factual finding?
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Istvan Kopacz
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2024
So with regard to the issue of the comment, this is a picture of defendant, or this displays the defendant's face, I think was the comment. That was clear, clearly erroneous, right? No, Your Honors. … Our position there is the — anything that was elicited, like, for questions that only an expert could have, someone with this — I think the cases say, like, this air — like, it's this air of expertise.
33 min of audioOral argument — Galvan v. Barnhart
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2004
The ALJ, I respectfully submit, did what I call acting as an expert witness. The ALJ said, well, there's no medically determinable reasons why Dr. Nolan should reach this conclusion. … So then if that's the case, why is it reversible that the ALJ decided to give greater weight to McKinsey's as he treated the Petitioner over a very long period of time? Two reasons.
20 min of audioOral argument — David Estrada-Escamilla v. Merrick Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2022
Okay, because I think your motion as worded was just a clean remand. Yes, Your Honor. Thank you, Counsel. Mr. Jacobs, you have about three minutes left. Thank you. … It lingers there for a long period of time. This case has been at the Ninth Circuit for over two years. There's been multiple extension requests.
22 min of audioOral argument — J. L. v. Mike Santos
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2017
He was acting strangely. The officers noticed that he was out of it. … Not like he's attacking people, but he's kind of acting crazy? Well, as Judge Coe said in her order, it was that the knife was being stabbed in the air. That's not erratic behavior.
31 min of audioOral argument — NW Requirments Utilties v. BPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2005
We had discussions with the Bonneville Power Administration about that, the period of negotiation. … There are arguments about whether Bonneville acted arbitrarily or capriciously or acted in violation of law, and that those are rate case determinations.
32 min of audioOral argument — Oracle USA, Inc. v. Rimini Street, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2023
So there are no environments on Rumini's systems, period, full stop. Every environment is on a client system. Clients all have licenses. … The train jumped the tracks going back to TiVo, solves that problem, and wipes the board clean. Thank you, Your Honors. Thank you, Counsel. This case is submitted.
33 min of audioOral argument — On the House v. Federal Express
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2003
Nonetheless, to the world, on July 31st, the air bill clearly says on the back, then in 97 and now, by giving us your package to deliver, you agreed to the terms. … The service guide, the air bill says that the service guide controls.
52 min of audioOral argument — Goldstein v. Harris
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2003
The bottom line is that we're asked to believe that these police officers committed such a gross act of misconduct that they should themselves be imprisoned, that within a two-minute process they became … And the testimony was not neat and clean, Your Honors. It was, it really had the indicia of truthful testimony, because he, when I say he, Mr. Campbell didn't give us everything we wanted.
46 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Heredia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2004
Because the district court, and she wants to establish, well, you know, when I dropped it off, boy, it was clean as a whistle. That's correct. … Notices a strong odor of air freshener or downy, something like that, in the car that's commonly used to mask marijuana.
42 min of audioOral argument — Litton Loan Servicing v. Robert Blendheim
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014
And if during that five-year period they don't make any payments on the loan, what they face as soon as that five-year period ends? That's correct. Notice default and notice of intent to sale. … So if you read the Bankruptcy Act, what's the best reason we should read Congress' silence in the Bankruptcy Act to support your claim, particularly given that the purpose of the act was to increase protections
41 min of audioOral argument — Lei v. Mukasey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2007
Do you have a comment on that? Yes, I do, Your Honor. … Just this comment. Finish your sentence.
25 min of audioOral argument — Henok v. Ashcraft
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2003
The prior counsel withdraws, and there's a period of time between that time and when the BIA act. How much time was that? I believe it was a matter of a few months. I don't know the exact dates. … So they asked for basically a 45-day period. It was still a 30-day period before the ruling where basically they were instructed they could still.
22 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Maloney
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2013
Maloney's luggage, period. The prosecutor had an opportunity to ask his agents and didn't. He had an opportunity to ask Mr. Maloney on cross-examination and didn't. … You know, we — you know, we — we want people to have a fair trial and a clean trial. So do I. Yeah. But the trouble is with your people, they go overboard.
62 min of audioOral argument — Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. USS-POSCO Industries
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2015
But a market allocation is also violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Correct. … Steel was not competing during this period of conspiracy is refuted directly by the record. It didn't exit the market, and it stayed in it.
44 min of audioOral argument — Oliver C. v. EDU-HI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2019
Would your position be that the Honolulu School District would have to incur the transportation costs of transporting him every day by air from Maui to Honolulu and back? … And so during that period of time of that one-month period, the personnel that would be working with Oliver had received training in ASL.
45 min of audioOral argument — Camco Pacific Construction Co v. Lexington Ins. Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2016
If the insurance company has no duty, which is what the District Court held, there's no way you can allege that they acted in bad faith because they had no duty. … the insurance company and there was coverage in that case And so the issue was that they didn't remediate quickly They forced this to trial As I'm sure is the case here with water damage, if you don't clean
30 min of audioOral argument — Alex Cannara v. Karla Nemeth
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2021
issued a proposed decision, the comments were received at the proposed decision, and then they addressed the comments in the final decision. … It just was brought out of thin air. And we're told now you're going to pay $10.5 billion. Where does the idea that you can't change it for 17 years? You cannot change the decision for 17 years.
40 min of audioOral argument — Rhode v. Bonta
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2026
And we think that it's a very clean analysis here. And that, of course, a law that says you have to pass through a gate that the government controls in order to acquire ammunition. … Thank you for your additional comments. And you have some time left for rebuttal. So I wanted to just start with the Dormant Commerce Clause claim.
44 min of audioOral argument — NLPC v. East Coast Lightning Equipment
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2020
I'll begin my presentation by addressing the Court's request for discussion about jurisdiction, and then I'll move on to the Lanham Act issues. … But all they have said is that these people bought our product, period. No additional commentary, no additional claims, no nothing.
35 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.